Cousins Trade Rumors

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

Post Reply
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by StumpHunter »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:42 am

You somehow think this team would be better off without Kirk cousins and having keenum and love instead, holding onto washed up players and signing a bunch of high priced free agents.
What washed up players? Outside of Waynes (who I wasn't a big fan of anyway, you were the one pounding the table to keep him I believe), every one of the players I wanted to keep played better than the guy who replaced them by a significant margin.

I am not going to continue to argue with you that water is wet. A single player taking up an average of 13% of the cap has a huge impact on a team's ability to sign free agents and keep their own players. Arguing otherwise is a bad look.
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:42 am How does that make this team any closer to a SB than we currently are? If anything, we went backwards because we still wouldn’t have the QB position solved and it would still be a gigantic question mark.
We have the QB position solved? I guess, if having a QB who is consistently "not the problem" on the team and needs excuse after excuse for him each year is solving the QB position. Personally, I look at the teams in the playoffs, particularly the final 4 teams and don't feel we have that position close to being solved.

Dumping Cousins and starting over solves the majority of our cap issues, if not necessarily our QB issue, which does bring us one step closer to the SB. It also frees the team up to make real moves to improve the QB spot, something that also gets us a step closer. As long as Cousins is on the team, we won't be a QB away from winning it all. We will be a cap strapped team that is a QB, a RG, LG, DT, DE, CB and whatever else we are missing because Cousins takes up too much of the cap to sign anyone at those spots away from the SB.

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:42 am
And we wouldn’t have Justin Jefferson and still have diggs in a run heavy scheme....because I’m sure he’d totally be okay with that and still want to be here with case keenum throwing to him in a run heavy scheme. But hey! It has nothing to do with Mike zimmer and his 1992 style and everything to do with Kirk cousins L.O.L.
Diggs was okay with it in 2015 and 2017 and it didn't seem to become an issue until his overpaid QB proved he couldn't handle a pass happy scheme in 2018. A scheme you blamed the majority of the issues in 2018 on then, but want to go back to now. But keep blaming everyone but the QB for the QB's failings. Can't wait to see who you blame for his failing in 2022 when Zimmer is gone and they replace him with an offensive minded coach who still can't make Cousins a winner.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

StumpHunter wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 8:15 am
What washed up players? Outside of Waynes (who I wasn't a big fan of anyway, you were the one pounding the table to keep him I believe)
I never once said Waynes was a washed up player. I would have kept Waynes and I did want to keep him but never did I want to make him the 7th highest paid CB in the league and pay him $42 million. The washed up players I was referring to were Rhodes and Griffen.
every one of the players I wanted to keep played better than the guy who replaced them by a significant margin.
Then clearly you didnt read my post very closely because that is false. Sure Rhodes played better THIS year in a new system with a fresh start. In terms of Rhodes being here, since 2017 his play has done nothing but go in reverse.....hard. And the guys that replaced him actually did outplay his 2019 season....by a significant margin. Hell, Dantzler played better this year that Rhodes has in his last two with the Vikings....by a significant margin. You can use this years numbers all you want, but Rhodes clearly needed a fresh start because what he was being asked to do here, he could clearly no longer do and it was getting worse by the game. If you dont see that, idk what to tell you.
I am not going to continue to argue with you that water is wet. A single player taking up an average of 13% of the cap has a huge impact on a team's ability to sign free agents and keep their own players. Arguing otherwise is a bad look.
I could honestly care less how I am looked at by you. It literally means nothing to me. You want to talk about bad looks but you were the one that just posted an offseason with Case Keenum and Jordan Love in it, 3 high priced free agents and Stefon Diggs still on the team, plus a million extensions. I'm starting to think that you believe Cousins is taking up 75% of the cap space because idk where all this freed up money is coming from that you claim we somehow would have to afford all that.
We have the QB position solved? I guess, if having a QB who is consistently "not the problem" on the team and needs excuse after excuse for him each year is solving the QB position. Personally, I look at the teams in the playoffs, particularly the final 4 teams and don't feel we have that position close to being solved.
But somehow Case Keenum (for what would be going on 4 straight years now) solves that problem? Like I said, you of all people have now held onto Case keenum (of all people) for 4 years. And over that time span, you would've been completely content with that? And not draft a QB until 2020? Who is a gigantic project? Ha.....
Dumping Cousins and starting over solves the majority of our cap issues, if not necessarily our QB issue, which does bring us one step closer to the SB. It also frees the team up to make real moves to improve the QB spot, something that also gets us a step closer. As long as Cousins is on the team, we won't be a QB away from winning it all. We will be a cap strapped team that is a QB, a RG, LG, DT, DE, CB and whatever else we are missing because Cousins takes up too much of the cap to sign anyone at those spots away from the SB.
All it frees up is space for us to sign a bunch of high priced free agents which Spielman never does nor have I ever been a fan of doing that. It frees up space for what else? To keep Xavier Rhodes on this team until he starts getting burned by fullbacks on deep routes? To keep Everson Griffen as a full time starter when he's much closer to being a situational pass rusher at this point? To keep Mac Alexander who didnt want to be on this team to begin with because of what our COACH did? To keep Waynes on this team so we could overpay him and watch everyone bitc# about it? To keep Diggs on this team and watch him continue to bitc# because no matter what QB we had right now, we'd still be in a run heavy scheme and he's still be getting overshadowed by Cook and Thielen. All so we could hold Case Keenum for 4 years and draft Jordan Love.....

Diggs was okay with it in 2015 and 2017 and it didn't seem to become an issue until his overpaid QB proved he couldn't handle a pass happy scheme in 2018. A scheme you blamed the majority of the issues in 2018 on then, but want to go back to now. But keep blaming everyone but the QB for the QB's failings. Can't wait to see who you blame for his failing in 2022 when Zimmer is gone and they replace him with an offensive minded coach who still can't make Cousins a winner.
I dont think this could possibly be more false.

1.) Did you really just say he was okay with it in 2015? His rookie year? Have you ever, in your lifetime seen a rookie WR complain about the scheme his team was running? I honestly cant even believe you just tried pulling that one. As for 2017, yeah that was right before shi# hit the fan. I've brought this up a million times. Diggs NEVER acted out prior to two things, the Minneapolis Miracle and when he got paid. He was a stand up guy until his head blew up to the size of a beach ball and he got paid (just to then see Thielen receive a contract that trumped his, which I guarantee you, also ticked him off). Hell even 2018 he was fine.

2.) In 2018 it became an issue? Really? You have it all as# backwards man. I dont once recall Diggs complaining about much of anything in 2018. Why? Because it was the most he was ever targeted in his career. It was the biggest season of his career. I have gone over this time and time again on here and you continue to ignore and point the finger at Cousins just because you want to blame Cousins for every possible thing under the sun. You cant stand him and the fact that he's on this team. It's been obvious for years now. The complaining by Diggs started in 2019 when they switched to a run heavy scheme. Where he then gets overshadowed by Thielen (for part of the season) and Cook more than he already did.

Think about it, in 2018 he has a huge season (149 targets and 102 catches) and we miss the playoffs....did he say a word? No. That's WITH Kirk Cousins AND a full year with Adam Thielen on the field.

In 2019, we switch to a run heavy scheme, he doesnt get near the amount of targets or catches (94 targets and 63 catches) and we MAKE the playoffs with Thielen being out half the year.

So our #1 WR ends up being out most of the year in 2019 and Diggs still had much lower numbers than 2018. Diggs KNOWS Cousins is more than capable of getting him the ball, at a very high rate no less. Clearly he did that in 2018 with another stud WR right across from him. So did you ever think that Diggs is probably not bothered by Cousins himself, he bothered by the scheme that doesnt call his number nearly as much as he wants. Diggs doesnt doubt Cousins ability, he doubted what the Vikings were using for a scheme. Which just further shows his selfishness because in 2019 we actually made the playoffs and had a solid year as a team. 2018 wasnt the case....but he got his fix so what did he care?

3.) I'm going to tell you one last time....stop twisting my words to try and help your argument. I did NOT say I wanted to go back to what we did in 2018 scheme wise. Go back and actually look what I wrote when I posted the podcast. I couldnt stand how Flip ran his offense. He phased Cook and Murray out of the game practically. Their problem is, they try to use the run early, get a lead and try to sustain that lead all game with it. If they dont have the lead, they pass heavy in the 2nd half because their approach failed. The run early approach isnt getting them that lead they need nearly as often as you'd like. Especially when you have a swiss cheese depleted defense that cant stop anyone from scoring. Their approach to each game was so predictable. This isnt something you're going to see in the box scores all the time. It comes down to game script and overall approach from a coaching standpoint. Kirk is one of the better pure passers in the NFL. Dont sit there and tell me he "cant handle a pass heavy scheme". Bottom line is, he shouldnt have to handle a pass heavy scheme, we have Dalvin Cook. I'm not asking for a pass heavy scheme. I'm asking for creativity, taking chances, keeping defenses on their toes, etc. Not running Dalvin Cook more than any RB in the NFL in the first quarter hoping you can get a lead, relying on playing good defense the rest of the game (which you couldnt do anyways this year) and continuing to run Dalvin until the final whistle blows as he's beaten to a pulp. Dalvin Cook will be lucky to see two more years in this league if that's what Zims approach is going to be.

Again all this stuff goes back to one thing....coaching. You want Kirk Cousins gone and are defending Mike Zimmer when it's Mike Zimmer that constantly seems to be the problem in these situations.

I dont recall anyone really blaming this season on Kirk Cousins....except you now. Which doesnt surprise me. He could win a SB and you'd find a loop hole like you always do to say he's not deserving of that trophy. Mike Zimmer has been wearing on me since week 1. Even somewhat prior to that. I've made that very clear on here. I have no reason to defend Kirk Cousins. If I have no problem ripping Zimmer, why wouldnt I rip Cousins? Because I dont think Cousins is the problem. I'm so sick of having all this talent year after year that Spielman brings in and have a QB that's plenty solid enough to get it done and get nowhere because we're living in 1992 offensively, we're stubborn when it comes to getting the best players on the field, we're conservative in every facet of the game and so on.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3994
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm
x 810

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by CharVike »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 11:03 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:25 pm This reminds me a bit of how people were arguing on here that Cousins was pretty much just as good as Rodgers now, because they had similar seasons statistically. That sure didn't hold up well after this past season, and I expect the same to happen with Watson next year when he instantly makes whatever team he goes to a playoff contender.

Volume stats are great and all, but they do not tell the whole story of a QB's season. Matt Shaub was a top 10 QB in nearly every passing statistic from 2009 to 2012. That didn't make him a top 10 QB, it just made him a QB who put up decent numbers in a QB friendly system.

But if you really need those stats, Watson's first 4 seasons are 5th all time in passing TDs, 2nd all time to only Mahomes in passer rating and 3rd in YPA. He is on pace to be the a top 5 QB all time and he is only going to get better. That doesn't even include what he adds as a rusher. The kid hasn't even peaked yet and any team that trades for him will have elite QB play for the next 5 seasons. He is a top tier QB who makes any team he plays on better. A guy you can build around if your GM isn't completely incompetent.

Here is one more stat that should be the end of the conversation over whether Watson is a significantly better QB than Cousins. GM's and HC's are scrambling to put together packages to trade for Watson. Multiple 1sts, pro bowl starters, all in an attempt to get this guy because the people paid millions to judge talent on the football field think he is the answer at QB they desperately need. Reports we hear from SF is that all Shanahan wants to give up, the guy who likes Cousins most in all of football, is a 2nd round pick. That is the difference between Watson and Cousins that the experts all agree on. Multiple firsts and starters, versus jack squat.

It isn't because they are biased by the media against Cousins, they don't care about stuff like that. It is because Watson is that much better and they KNOW it. They are betting their jobs on it and when the dust settles and multiple teams failed to get Watson, they aint coming looking at the Vikings to throw those picks at Cousins. They will prefer to take their chances in the draft, just like we should be doing if we can't get Watson.
In 2017, Aaron Rodgers missed most of the season. The Packers barely won a game.

Over the past two years, when his volume stats were similar to Cousins, the Packers were 26-6. Meanwhile the Vikings, with Cousins putting up numbers, were 17-15.

Some guys just win. They make everyone around them better, and they win. As much as it pains me to say it, Rodgers is such a player. Cousins is not.

Almost every football coach, scout, GM and executive sees Deshaun Watson in the same way as they see Rodgers. As you said, they’re lining up to offer packages of multiple first-round picks for Watson. There are many reasons for this, but I can guarantee you ... it’s NOT because his stats are comparable to Kirk Cousins.
You're comparing Cousins to a HOFer. That's fair. Compare Rodgers to Brady who are both HOFers. It's not close. Rodgers will win our division but once the playoffs start he will beat the 1st round team at home but then it gets tougher and that crappy team around him will fold as it did the last two seasons. Can't even make a game out of it. Didn't even show up. So he made no one around him better. They weren't that good before and he couldn't make them play better as you stated. He doesn't make anyone play better around him is the bottom line. If he did they would have kicked the worn out Bucs teams ####. Instead he let them get their #### kicked. Just the opposite. Yes he gets them to play better against the Jags. Whopee. I said from the day Cousins arrived that he is the best since Tark. That's been proven. Is he a HOFer? No. Our biggest problem facing us is dealing with a HOF QB year in and year out. People think he's declining and will end next year. That's not happening. Our D needs to apply pressure. If every GM sees Watson as equal to Rodgers then Houston will make every trade ever made in the NFL look light. And if he goes to the Jets I guess they are the Super Bowl team. That won't happen either. Watson is a very good QB with a big mouth. Anything goes wrong and the #### will start and asking to be traded. Houston can keep him. Maybe they will win more than 4 games if they do. Then again maybe not. Some winner.
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by StumpHunter »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:37 am But somehow Case Keenum (for what would be going on 4 straight years now) solves that problem? Like I said, you of all people have now held onto Case keenum (of all people) for 4 years. And over that time span, you would've been completely content with that? And not draft a QB until 2020? Who is a gigantic project? Ha.....
Case Keenum is the type of QB I think could get as many wins for the Vikings as Cousins, who also happens to have a proven track record with the Vikings, which is why he is my default answer for a cheap alternative to Cousins. I know he isn't the longt term answer, knew it in 2017 when I was one of like 3 Viking's fans pointing out that he was a bridge QB at best, while other fans were out saying they would prefer him to Brady. If you get hung up on that name, feel free to replace him with any number of available borderline starters.
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:37 am I dont recall anyone really blaming this season on Kirk Cousins....except you now.
I am not blaming Cousins play for the Viking's failure this season. I am blaming him for not being good enough to pick up the slack with his contract being the biggest reason we lost so many starters. While most QBs would not have won more than 8 games with the terrible roster Rick put on the field, some would and I want one of those QBs that would have. I am not satisfied with consistently average. Why are you?
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 11:37 am I have no reason to defend Kirk Cousins. If I have no problem ripping Zimmer, why wouldnt I rip Cousins?
It is easy to replace a coach, while replacing a QB who is guaranteed 76 million over the next two seasons is hard. You need Cousins to not be a problem because you know we are probably stuck with him, so you fool yourself into believing it is everyone's fault but Cousins so you can keep believing that there is hope he can turn things around.

There is also a little bit of not wanting to admit you are wrong about Cousins. You will defend him till the day he plays so poorly he is benched, cut or traded, at which point you will claim you never liked him that much in the first place.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

StumpHunter wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:25 pm This reminds me a bit of how people were arguing on here that Cousins was pretty much just as good as Rodgers now, because they had similar seasons statistically. That sure didn't hold up well after this past season, and I expect the same to happen with Watson next year when he instantly makes whatever team he goes to a playoff contender.

Volume stats are great and all, but they do not tell the whole story of a QB's season. Matt Shaub was a top 10 QB in nearly every passing statistic from 2009 to 2012. That didn't make him a top 10 QB, it just made him a QB who put up decent numbers in a QB friendly system.

But if you really need those stats, Watson's first 4 seasons are 5th all time in passing TDs, 2nd all time to only Mahomes in passer rating and 3rd in YPA. He is on pace to be the a top 5 QB all time and he is only going to get better. That doesn't even include what he adds as a rusher. The kid hasn't even peaked yet and any team that trades for him will have elite QB play for the next 5 seasons. He is a top tier QB who makes any team he plays on better. A guy you can build around if your GM isn't completely incompetent.

Here is one more stat that should be the end of the conversation over whether Watson is a significantly better QB than Cousins. GM's and HC's are scrambling to put together packages to trade for Watson. Multiple 1sts, pro bowl starters, all in an attempt to get this guy because the people paid millions to judge talent on the football field think he is the answer at QB they desperately need. Reports we hear from SF is that all Shanahan wants to give up, the guy who likes Cousins most in all of football, is a 2nd round pick. That is the difference between Watson and Cousins that the experts all agree on. Multiple firsts and starters, versus jack squat.

It isn't because they are biased by the media against Cousins, they don't care about stuff like that. It is because Watson is that much better and they KNOW it. They are betting their jobs on it and when the dust settles and multiple teams failed to get Watson, they aint coming looking at the Vikings to throw those picks at Cousins. They will prefer to take their chances in the draft, just like we should be doing if we can't get Watson.
:lol: Hey pal....that "stat" isnt actually a stat because there has NOT been any talk at all between the 49ers and Vikings regarding a trade according to Adam Schefter. Stat's are actual facts. This indeed is not one.

Also, I would say most agree that Watson might be better than Cousins but when you put their numbers next to each other, the question is, is he THAT much better than Cousins and can get this team over the hump? My answer is no he's not THAT much better and when you pair that with the fact that he will cost multiple first rounders and a lot of money, I dont think it's the best business decision.

No less, for you to think that a 2nd rounder was actually true is kind of funny. Because Matt Stafford just brought in a haul of 2 first rounders, a 3rd rounder and and Jared Goff..... yet you think Cousins was going to bring in a 2nd rounder. When even you admitted Cousins is a better QB than Stafford.

The media just swallowed you up right there....
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3716
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by StumpHunter »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:12 pm
:lol: Hey pal....that "stat" isnt actually a stat because there has NOT been any talk at all between the 49ers and Vikings regarding a trade according to Adam Schefter. Stat's are actual facts. This indeed is not one.
You mean SF isn't even wanting to give up a 2nd? Pathetic.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

StumpHunter wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:08 pm
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 1:12 pm
:lol: Hey pal....that "stat" isnt actually a stat because there has NOT been any talk at all between the 49ers and Vikings regarding a trade according to Adam Schefter. Stat's are actual facts. This indeed is not one.
You mean SF isn't even wanting to give up a 2nd? Pathetic.
You are literally like arguing with a child. There hasnt been any discussions of trading Cousins. You are claiming SF said they were only offering a 2nd. That is false. Period.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:16 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:08 pm
You mean SF isn't even wanting to give up a 2nd? Pathetic.
You are literally like arguing with a child. There hasnt been any discussions of trading Cousins. You are claiming SF said they were only offering a 2nd. That is false. Period.
That depends on your definition of "discussions."

If you're talking GM to GM, it's impossible to know. You can say there haven't been any REPORTS of discussions, but unless you're in the room with Rick Spielman, you can't prove a negative.

If you're talking reasonably reliable NFL sources, I'd say you're incorrect.
Ross Tucker of Westwood One and The Athletic wrote:Sounds like it will be Cousins in San Francisco but either way I still think Jimmy G starts the opener for the Pats.
Evan Massey of NFL Analytics wrote:#49ers still looking to make a move at QB. Kirk Cousins, I'm told, is a name to keep an eye on. If #Vikings are open to dealing, San Francisco will push hard to acquire him. Ties with Shanahan make this an intriguing potential fit.
The Washington Post wrote:But wait — could Garoppolo be going to the Minnesota Vikings in a transaction that reunites 49ers Coach Kyle Shanahan with Kirk Cousins, whom he developed in Washington? That scenario made the rounds Monday, leading San Francisco players such as running back Raheem Mostert and star tight end George Kittle to speak out in favor of Garoppolo.
There's a lot more where those came from, including some rumored deals with the Bears for two firsts and a third. Another has a first and Kyle Fuller to the Vikings in exchange for Cousins. These other sources aren't as reliable to me, but they're out there. We scoff at the idea of some team giving up a king's ransom for Cousins, but imagine if you're a Bears fan, and your team acquires 4,200 yards and 35 TDs. You'd call that Nirvana.

Not busting your chops here. It's just impossible to say whether there are actually substantive talks about a deal involving Cousins. I never like to say "there hasn't been any discussions" because I don't know if that's true. Even Adam Schefter said, and I quote, "I have not heard anything about Kirk Cousins being available.” That's a far cry from "no discussions." He just doesn't know of any. Doesn't mean they haven't happened.

I posted a lot of impassioned thoughts yesterday. Honestly, I'm sick of the mediocrity. But after some thought, here's where I land on Cousins.

• He's a good quarterback, sometimes a great one.
• He tends to fall on his face at inopportune times.
• Just when you think he's learned the value of throwing the ball away, he gets strip sacked.
• He's maddeningly inconsistent. To wit, first six games of hot garbage this season, followed by 10 really good ones.
• To my mind, he doesn't elevate his team, especially when the game is on the line.
• There's only one quarterback potentially available — Deshaun Watson — who would be an upgrade.

Those are just my thoughts. With that in mind, my feeling is that if the Vikings can deal him and get enough draft capital in return that they can either a) make a deal for Deshaun Watson, or b) move up and draft one of this year's top QBs, then they should do it.

If not, they should stand pat.

Thanks.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8621
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1072

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by VikingLord »

StumpHunter wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:25 pm It isn't because they are biased by the media against Cousins, they don't care about stuff like that. It is because Watson is that much better and they KNOW it. They are betting their jobs on it and when the dust settles and multiple teams failed to get Watson, they aint coming looking at the Vikings to throw those picks at Cousins. They will prefer to take their chances in the draft, just like we should be doing if we can't get Watson.
I don't understand why Houston would ever consider trading Watson if there isn't more to it than the stats you've listed...

Something smells in Superstar QB Land.

You're right that Cousins won't garner those sorts of trade offers. But that is mostly because the Vikings aren't dangling him and he's not angling to leave. He's not the the problem.

I say let the other teams blow out their future to get Watson. Maybe he'll prove to be worth it. I doubt that, but maybe.

The Vikings should focus their draft capital and FA decisions on moves that will help improve the overall team, especially in their obvious problem areas.

I'll use a comic book analogy for this situation.

The Vikings are Superman. They can fly and have super strength already. But they have this weakness around Kryptonite. When they are around that, all of their super powers are made ineffective and they are weak and helpless.

So if you're Superman and you need to go into a dangerous situation, getting stronger or being able to fly faster isn't going to help if the opponent has a big chunk Kryptonite in their hands. To beat that enemy, you have to find a way to either get the Kryptonite away from them or find a defense against its effects. Otherwise, you still won't be able to defeat that enemy.

Watson might be a better QB than Cousins, but he doesn't change their fundamental issues, and without fixing those, the Vikings aren't going anywhere new, which is what I think we all want. It's just not the right move for the situation anymore than trading a 2nd for a pass rusher was the right move before last season started. Its salve for a wound they don't have when other wounds they do have go untreated and are allowed to fester.

Spielman can impress me most by demonstrating he understands that and he can do that by addressing those specific issues this offseason. If he trades for Watson, no matter what he gives up to get him, he'll be demonstrating the exact opposite.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 3:27 pm
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 2:16 pm

You are literally like arguing with a child. There hasnt been any discussions of trading Cousins. You are claiming SF said they were only offering a 2nd. That is false. Period.
That depends on your definition of "discussions."

If you're talking GM to GM, it's impossible to know. You can say there haven't been any REPORTS of discussions, but unless you're in the room with Rick Spielman, you can't prove a negative.

If you're talking reasonably reliable NFL sources, I'd say you're incorrect.
Ross Tucker of Westwood One and The Athletic wrote:Sounds like it will be Cousins in San Francisco but either way I still think Jimmy G starts the opener for the Pats.
Evan Massey of NFL Analytics wrote:#49ers still looking to make a move at QB. Kirk Cousins, I'm told, is a name to keep an eye on. If #Vikings are open to dealing, San Francisco will push hard to acquire him. Ties with Shanahan make this an intriguing potential fit.
The Washington Post wrote:But wait — could Garoppolo be going to the Minnesota Vikings in a transaction that reunites 49ers Coach Kyle Shanahan with Kirk Cousins, whom he developed in Washington? That scenario made the rounds Monday, leading San Francisco players such as running back Raheem Mostert and star tight end George Kittle to speak out in favor of Garoppolo.
There's a lot more where those came from, including some rumored deals with the Bears for two firsts and a third. Another has a first and Kyle Fuller to the Vikings in exchange for Cousins. These other sources aren't as reliable to me, but they're out there. We scoff at the idea of some team giving up a king's ransom for Cousins, but imagine if you're a Bears fan, and your team acquires 4,200 yards and 35 TDs. You'd call that Nirvana.

Not busting your chops here. It's just impossible to say whether there are actually substantive talks about a deal involving Cousins. I never like to say "there hasn't been any discussions" because I don't know if that's true. Even Adam Schefter said, and I quote, "I have not heard anything about Kirk Cousins being available.” That's a far cry from "no discussions." He just doesn't know of any. Doesn't mean they haven't happened.

I posted a lot of impassioned thoughts yesterday. Honestly, I'm sick of the mediocrity. But after some thought, here's where I land on Cousins.

• He's a good quarterback, sometimes a great one.
• He tends to fall on his face at inopportune times.
• Just when you think he's learned the value of throwing the ball away, he gets strip sacked.
• He's maddeningly inconsistent. To wit, first six games of hot garbage this season, followed by 10 really good ones.
• To my mind, he doesn't elevate his team, especially when the game is on the line.
• There's only one quarterback potentially available — Deshaun Watson — who would be an upgrade.

Those are just my thoughts. With that in mind, my feeling is that if the Vikings can deal him and get enough draft capital in return that they can either a) make a deal for Deshaun Watson, or b) move up and draft one of this year's top QBs, then they should do it.

If not, they should stand pat.

Thanks.
Kapp just quickly addressing your post regarding Cousins being traded.

Those aren’t credible sources man. And this rumor initially came from Massey and the others branched off of it. The site he writes for has like 1,000 followers. He’s simply not credible. If it was a legitimate rumor you’d see one or both of Adam Schefter or Rapopport backing it. This is what Schefter said....
There are no absolutes in the league, anything is possible, but I have not heard anything about Kirk Cousins being available this offseason. We'll see if anything changes."
There is nobody that’s more plugged into the nfl than Schefter.

And I think you took what I said too literally. Yeah obviously I have no idea if Spielman has talked to another GM.

Stump was trying to rip cousins like usual and say that he only warrants a 2nd round pick or worse because he was sucked in by a unreliable rumor. What I was saying is that there is no credible source that has said this discussion is even going on between the Vikings and SF. And the most credible source in the nfl in Schefter even came out and said that cousins has not been made available

And let’s be honest, does it make any sense that Matt Stafford draws 2 first round picks, a 3rd round pick and a below average QB and Kirk cousins only warrants a 2nd, 4th and a below average QB (which the Initial rumor was claiming)? Does that make any sense at all?

That’s like comparing these trade situations to the diggs and Hopkins trades this offseason.

Hopkins warrants David Johnson and a 2nd round pick

Diggs warrants a first round pick, 4th and 7th

Hopkins IMO is the best WR in the entire league. Diggs is good no doubt but Hopkins is as elite as they come. That Hopkins trade was so out of whack it’s not even funny. Hell if the Vikings even got that for diggs I’d throw up. I said just before diggs was traded that I don’t mind it if we get the right haul (and I was sick of his antics in general). That’s exactly what the Vikings did, got a good haul and it got them Jefferson.

Trading cousins for what this rumor suggested would be an absolutely idiotic trade on spielmans part. You would get worse at QB just to gain a 2nd round pick which gets you no closer to getting a QB in the draft or someone like Watson.

Either way my point is, stumps 2nd round pick argument is simply reckless speculation that has zero backing behind it
Last edited by Pondering Her Percy on Fri Feb 05, 2021 12:01 am, edited 2 times in total.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
vikeinmontana
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:23 pm
x 141

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by vikeinmontana »

He’s gonna go to the Pats and we might just get to see if he’s Cousins 2.0
i'm ready for a beer.
YikesVikes
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1615
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 12:04 am
x 235

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by YikesVikes »

VikingLord wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:51 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Wed Feb 03, 2021 8:25 pm It isn't because they are biased by the media against Cousins, they don't care about stuff like that. It is because Watson is that much better and they KNOW it. They are betting their jobs on it and when the dust settles and multiple teams failed to get Watson, they aint coming looking at the Vikings to throw those picks at Cousins. They will prefer to take their chances in the draft, just like we should be doing if we can't get Watson.
I don't understand why Houston would ever consider trading Watson if there isn't more to it than the stats you've listed...

Something smells in Superstar QB Land.

You're right that Cousins won't garner those sorts of trade offers. But that is mostly because the Vikings aren't dangling him and he's not angling to leave. He's not the the problem.

I say let the other teams blow out their future to get Watson. Maybe he'll prove to be worth it. I doubt that, but maybe.

The Vikings should focus their draft capital and FA decisions on moves that will help improve the overall team, especially in their obvious problem areas.

I'll use a comic book analogy for this situation.

The Vikings are Superman. They can fly and have super strength already. But they have this weakness around Kryptonite. When they are around that, all of their super powers are made ineffective and they are weak and helpless.

So if you're Superman and you need to go into a dangerous situation, getting stronger or being able to fly faster isn't going to help if the opponent has a big chunk Kryptonite in their hands. To beat that enemy, you have to find a way to either get the Kryptonite away from them or find a defense against its effects. Otherwise, you still won't be able to defeat that enemy.

Watson might be a better QB than Cousins, but he doesn't change their fundamental issues, and without fixing those, the Vikings aren't going anywhere new, which is what I think we all want. It's just not the right move for the situation anymore than trading a 2nd for a pass rusher was the right move before last season started. Its salve for a wound they don't have when other wounds they do have go untreated and are allowed to fester.

Spielman can impress me most by demonstrating he understands that and he can do that by addressing those specific issues this offseason. If he trades for Watson, no matter what he gives up to get him, he'll be demonstrating the exact opposite.
Except your are wrong. Watson does address the offenses biggest issue; OL play. Due to his ability with his feet, he has shown a Superman like absolute to get out of trouble and buy time for his receivers. Something COVID Kirk simply cannot do. So adding Watson would be removing the Kryptonite.

That’s said, I’m not a fan of the trade. The costs would be too high and Honestly Kirk played very well the last 10 weeks of the season and if not for his awful contract I would saw he deserves a change to prove he can continue the trend. I would consider Giving up Kirk for Watson and a 2nd round pick. Can’t do that cause the idiot GM traded it for a later draft pick.
User avatar
VikingPaul73
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
x 141

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by VikingPaul73 »

https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/2/4/ ... ta-vikings

Sounds like Watson will not play for Vikings
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

YikesVikes wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 1:46 am
VikingLord wrote: Thu Feb 04, 2021 5:51 pm

I don't understand why Houston would ever consider trading Watson if there isn't more to it than the stats you've listed...

Something smells in Superstar QB Land.

You're right that Cousins won't garner those sorts of trade offers. But that is mostly because the Vikings aren't dangling him and he's not angling to leave. He's not the the problem.

I say let the other teams blow out their future to get Watson. Maybe he'll prove to be worth it. I doubt that, but maybe.

The Vikings should focus their draft capital and FA decisions on moves that will help improve the overall team, especially in their obvious problem areas.

I'll use a comic book analogy for this situation.

The Vikings are Superman. They can fly and have super strength already. But they have this weakness around Kryptonite. When they are around that, all of their super powers are made ineffective and they are weak and helpless.

So if you're Superman and you need to go into a dangerous situation, getting stronger or being able to fly faster isn't going to help if the opponent has a big chunk Kryptonite in their hands. To beat that enemy, you have to find a way to either get the Kryptonite away from them or find a defense against its effects. Otherwise, you still won't be able to defeat that enemy.

Watson might be a better QB than Cousins, but he doesn't change their fundamental issues, and without fixing those, the Vikings aren't going anywhere new, which is what I think we all want. It's just not the right move for the situation anymore than trading a 2nd for a pass rusher was the right move before last season started. Its salve for a wound they don't have when other wounds they do have go untreated and are allowed to fester.

Spielman can impress me most by demonstrating he understands that and he can do that by addressing those specific issues this offseason. If he trades for Watson, no matter what he gives up to get him, he'll be demonstrating the exact opposite.
Except your are wrong. Watson does address the offenses biggest issue; OL play. Due to his ability with his feet, he has shown a Superman like absolute to get out of trouble and buy time for his receivers. Something COVID Kirk simply cannot do. So adding Watson would be removing the Kryptonite.

That’s said, I’m not a fan of the trade. The costs would be too high and Honestly Kirk played very well the last 10 weeks of the season and if not for his awful contract I would saw he deserves a change to prove he can continue the trend. I would consider Giving up Kirk for Watson and a 2nd round pick. Can’t do that cause the idiot GM traded it for a later draft pick.
But here is my thing, does Watson solve the OL problem? His OL was bad in Houston too outside of his left tackle. In the last 3 years, Watson has taken 155 sacks. Kirk has taken 107 in the last 3 years. That's a gigantic difference. No less Watson has the athleticism to escape and Kirk is the opposite. This isnt just a small margin, it's huge. How does a "statue" type QB take 48 less sacks in 3 years with one of the worst interior OLs in football but a guy that everyone wants basically because of his escapability takes 16 more sacks a year on average?

I figured it in a previous post. Let's say sacks are "on average" a 7 yard loss each time. That would mean that Deshaun Watson has lost 336 more yards than Kirk Cousins due to sacks. That's insane. So my question is, does Watson REALLY help solve/hide the OL issue? I dont really think he does. There will be times during a game where he does, but overall, he's taking A LOT more than Cousins is in the long run. And then when you compare the rest of the 3 year stats of Cousins and Watson, they are near identical. So this is why I'm not a fan of this trade because Watson is going to cost an arm and a leg draft pick wise and be a monstrous hit on the cap. And in the end, how much more does Watson REALLY help us compared to Cousins? Many wont see it this way, but lets not let the media continue to pump up Watson and rip Cousins.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
User avatar
Thaumaturgist
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 916
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 7:29 am
x 85
Contact:

Re: Cousins Trade Rumors

Post by Thaumaturgist »

VikingPaul73 wrote: Fri Feb 05, 2021 3:46 am https://www.dailynorseman.com/2021/2/4/ ... ta-vikings

Sounds like Watson will not play for Vikings
If he doesn't want to be here then I don't want him here even if he's the next Tom Brady. :rock: :banana:
Post Reply