The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

IrishViking
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by IrishViking »

vikeinmontana wrote: I can get on board with this. I think we can win without teddy having an amazing game...but I think it could do a lot for teddy personally and more importantly our team this year and going forward if he steps up and plays great.


I dont understand the line of thinking that he is phoning it in. What beside a poor line makes you think that he is half assing anything? This is one of the most focused 23 year olds I have ever seen in my life. Something needs to improve but I don't think its his attitude towards winning or big games at all.
vikeinmontana
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3174
Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:23 pm
x 141

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by vikeinmontana »

IrishViking wrote:

I dont understand the line of thinking that he is phoning it in. What beside a poor line makes you think that he is half assing anything? This is one of the most focused 23 year olds I have ever seen in my life. Something needs to improve but I don't think its his attitude towards winning or big games at all.
:?
did you mean to quote me here? I definitely have never said (nor have I read anyone say) that I believe teddy is phoning it in or "half-assing" anything. I have heard nothing against the way he prepares or having a lack of focus. I DO however think he has struggled at times this year, hasn't been aggressive at times where he could be, and has made some poor decisions. I also DO believe that a big game from him this sunday could go a long ways. nothing more...nothing less.

this is just my opinion of course and likely unnecessary as I doubt you were meaning to quote me.
i'm ready for a beer.
User avatar
Husker Vike
Franchise Player
Posts: 431
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 11:35 pm
x 37

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by Husker Vike »

I think that Teddy is never going to be the Favre type gunslinger that we seem to want, and that's ok. The biggest flaw that I see is that he is trying to hold the ball too long and that is extremely hard to wait on a receiver get open with our line . I have been watching Oakland's Carr play some this season and he has a lot more time in the pocket than Bridgwater, and a much stronger arm to zip balls into tight windows. But I also see a lot more questionable decisions than Teddy makes. But I think Teddy also can grow more and develop into a solid QB, just not an Elite level QB. The way our team is built i'll take a great game manager over a turnover machine.
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by mosscarter »

everyone also likes to mention teddy's lack of interceptions. well that is easily conceivable when you basically take no risks throwing the ball downfield the entire game (or the entire season for the most part). they tried twice the other night and missed and then never went back to it. but, judging by how badly teddy missed those throws i wouldn't have gone back either. he needs to show he's capable. the seahawks are going to force him to throw the ball and everyone knows it, so if he can't prepare himself accordingly on some level we will get slaughtered. can anyone in here honestly see teddy taking this game over on sunday because i cannot? peterson will have to be otherworldly that is our only hope.
TSonn
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2127
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Michigan
x 132

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by TSonn »

mosscarter wrote:tsonn i gave you straight passing statistics from 8 games "not video game statistics." and for that matter, i don't need any type of statistics to tell me bridgewater is no good. all one needs to do is watch him. 14 passing touchdowns in 16 games stands alone and totally speaks for itself. i'm not even sure fox news could spin that into a franchise qb, or even a qb that has shown progression according to any standards. someone mentioned turner is maybe taking the same route with aikman as he did with bridgewater and i nearly spit my coffee on my laptop. exactly what route would that be because so far it looks like a dead end street. citing the fact that we on 6 out of those 8 games is pointless. as someone said, put teddy on the browns, titans, or raiders (or many other sub par teams) and then see if his winning record would hold up. the sad truth is that aside from him; we are a really good team. people keep making excuses for him. it's the o-line, it's the receivers, it's norv. my favorite one of all though is that it is peterson's fault. any qb in the nfl would die to have the best back of this generation in the backfield, but it is his fault teddy can't develop even a mild semblance of a downfield passing game. no, it's the fact that he can't hit a wide open mcckinnon on a throw a division II qb could make (overthrows are the only consistent thing he does). we just won a division title and our qb didn't do a SINGLE thing to contribute to that victory. in fact, he's done that multiple times this season. this team wins in spite of him. who knows, maybe he'll come out and throw for 300 yds and 2 td's sunday, but it won't matter because he'll follow it up with a 100 yd performance next week. his track record speaks for itself.
I wasn't saying that you were citing video game stats when you mentioned Teddy's worst games of the year. That doesn't even make sense. I was referring to older posts of yours in a different topic where you mentioned Brees throwing 7 TDs in one game as a comparison and reason for why Teddy was a bad quarterback. Your posts are always very memorable due to the vitriol you have towards Teddy and (to be honest) your lack of punctuation/capitalization.

"I don't need any type of statistics to tell me Bridgewater is no good ... 14 passing TDs in 16 games stands alone and totally speaks for itself". Read that back and see if that makes any sense. Stats are clearly important to you (as shown by your post history) so it's bizarre to claim otherwise.

I mentioned how Aikman performed under Norv because it is definitely relevant. I know you're not a stats guy :roll: but check this out:

Aikman's 3 years with Norv as the OC:
1991 (age 25, 3rd year in the league) | Att: 363 | Comp%: 65.3 | Yards: 2754 | TD: 11 | INT: 10 | Y/A: 7.6 | TD% 3.0 | Rate: 86.7 |
1992 | Att: 473 | Comp% 63.8 | Yards: 3445 | TD: 23 | INT: 14 | Y/A: 7.3 | TD% 4.9 | Rate: 89.5 |
1993 | Att: 392 | Comp% 69.1 | Yards: 3100 | TD: 15 | INT: 6 | Y/A: 7.9 | TD% 3.8 | Rate: 99.0 |

Teddy's 2 years with Norv as the OC:
2014 (age 22, 1st year in the league) | Att: 402 | Comp% 64.4 | Yards: 2919 | TD: 14 | INT: 12 | Y/A: 7.3 | TD%: 3.5 | Rate: 85.2 |
2015 | Att: 447 | Comp% 65.3 | Yards: 3231 | TD: 14 | INT: 9 | Y/A: 7.2 | TD%: 3.1 | Rate: 88.7 |

They are remarkably similar stats. Also note that Aikman had 2-3 more years of experience at this point in his career. And keep in mind that Aikman had Emmitt Smith (arguably one of the best RBs of all time and HOFer) and Michael Irvin (arguably one of the best WRs of all time and HOFer). Smith is comparable to Peterson on our team, but we have no weapon like Irvin out wide. This comparison isn't one of those "well Aikman sucked his first year and look what he became" - this comparison has value because it's the same offensive coordinator with a similar rushing attack and a comparable winning record. Teddy is performing eerily similar to Aikman under Norv as an OC and with fewer weapons on offense and comparable overall team record. I would argue that this comparison is actually better than any current QB comparison based on those similarities.

Maybe Norv sees similarities between Bridgewater and Aikman so he is bringing him along the same way he developed Aikman?

Last bit - of course we need to consider that we won 6 of those 8 games that you mentioned. It's important, not necessarily to try to legitimize the stats, but to understand why the stats happened that way. When we get a lead, we run the ball and run the clock. That's our team's philosophy. Could it be because the coaches don't trust Teddy yet to throw more? Maybe. It could also be that we have the best RB in the league, too. But the point is whenever they get a lead, Teddy has very little opportunity to boost his stats. The only games they allowed that to happen was Week 15 and 16 against the Bears and the Giants and you clearly didn't cite those games in your previous post because they were apparently satisfying to you.
Last edited by TSonn on Wed Jan 06, 2016 11:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by mosscarter »

tsonn: my man let me know how relevant it is after sunday, or better yet, if we pull off a miracle this week let me know next week. teddy couldn't boost his sorry stats all year when the teams were in freaking prevent defense. we will not come out of the nfc and it is solely because of our terrible quarterback. end of story. every other aspect of our team is complete. in fact, compared to how pathetic our offense has been all year and what our defense has had to defend all year i'd say we have the number one defense in the nfl. period. when you have a qb who can't pass for over 200 yards in nearly half of your games there is no balance. you live in la la land.
TSonn
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2127
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 11:52 am
Location: Michigan
x 132

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by TSonn »

mosscarter wrote:you live in la la land.
Please explain how my last post puts me in la la land? I didn't say anywhere that Teddy is the best QB in the league or anything close to that. I'm showing that he's performing quite similar to Troy Aikman under extremely similar circumstances (including offensive coordinator and team philosophy).

Oh, by the way, Aikman threw for close to (210) or less than 200 yards 4-6 games a year during that stretch as well.

If la la land is a place where people use critical thinking skills and reason, I guess I'll be happy to be there!
mosscarter wrote:we will not come out of the nfc and it is solely because of our terrible quarterback. end of story.
Oh, OK. So you're already blaming a loss AND not making it to the Super Bowl on Teddy. Got it. I've forgotten how easy it is to get to that game each year so we should just expect to make it there!
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by mosscarter »

no tsonn. our team is that good to win a championship aside from our quarterback. that is all i'm saying. but, apparently that is a huge disagreement among you and many others including zimmer. well, like i said look me up soon because the NUMBER 1 PROBLEM WITH THIS TEAM IS THE QUARTERBACK. mark my words. he might come out and play great this week, but to even entertain the fact he can beat newton or palmer is utterly insane.
purpletinted66
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by purpletinted66 »

Mothman wrote: I don't think it's that black and white. I thought Reusse made a good point there.

Based on what I've seen, Bridgewater does look to throw it away too easily. He's pretty risk-averse and I've seen him throw the ball away quite a few times when he could have thrown to a receiver. I think it may reflect a difference in experience and confidence between TB and the QBs Reusse listed. It may also be what he's coached to do but he does throw it away a lot and I'd argue that he also does it more than necessary.

The flip side to that argument is, of course, that the Vikings won 11 games this season and it's better for TB to err on the side of caution because it avoids turnovers and the Vikes defense is solid. Better to punt than turn it over along with all the momentum that accompanies an INT.
I was shocked to see how miniscule Teddy's rushing numbers are, even going back to college. We've seen some good effects when he tucks the ball and runs - perhaps if he had better recognition of when to scat he could avoid some of those instances where he can't find open receivers/or is under pressure and opts to throw it away.
Image
IrishViking
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by IrishViking »

purpletinted66 wrote:I was shocked to see how miniscule Teddy's rushing numbers are, even going back to college. We've seen some good effects when he tucks the ball and runs - perhaps if he had better recognition of when to scat he could avoid some of those instances where he can't find open receivers/or is under pressure and opts to throw it away.

I've noticed a few times where he has almost seemed to keep his eyes downfield TOO long where there was the potential to safely gain maybe 5-6 yards it turns into just getting out of bounds at the LoS or just past it because the defender recognizes he has to run before Teddy does and cuts him off. Its hard to fault him for wanting to throw it for the bigger gain, but this is certainly a game where Teddy needs to take what he can get and be as efficient as possible.
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL
x 67

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by Raptorman »

mosscarter wrote:no tsonn. our team is that good to win a championship aside from our quarterback. that is all i'm saying. but, apparently that is a huge disagreement among you and many others including zimmer. well, like i said look me up soon because the NUMBER 1 PROBLEM WITH THIS TEAM IS THE QUARTERBACK. mark my words. he might come out and play great this week, but to even entertain the fact he can beat newton or palmer is utterly insane.
Up until this past Sunday, I am sure you would have Rodgers on that short list. FWIW, He beat Newton last year.

And oh yeah, Palmer and Bridgewaters numbers from the game this year. Damn, not even close.

25/36 335 1 td 0 int
25/35 310 2 td 0 int.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9805
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by Cliff »

chicagopurple wrote:If Teddy plays like he has lately it will all be for naught. Time to put on his big boy pants. NOT the brown ones.
When you say "plays like he has lately" I take it you mean just the very last game? The 3 before that (which I consider lately) he did quite well ..
IrishViking
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 am

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by IrishViking »

Cliff wrote: When you say "plays like he has lately" I take it you mean just the very last game? The 3 before that (which I consider lately) he did quite well ..

But only one of those fits with the narrative that Teddy is a manchild hack!
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by fiestavike »

Mothman wrote:
I understand what you're saying but is anybody here actually suggesting the Vikings need a QB who throws for 30+ TDs and 4000+ yards a year to win it all?
Yes.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: The Teddy Bridgewater Thread

Post by Mothman »

fiestavike wrote: Yes.
Thank you for that concise and informative contribution. ;)
Locked