interesting. i wonder to what extent AD was the subject of that conversation?TeamChaplain wrote:This is AWESOME! I thought this might have been the case!
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100000 ... kings-deal
Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Like he was going back to Packers. He was talking up AD hoping he got record. Talking about wanting to play indoors. Selling his house a week ago. The Packers wouldn't even match the Vikings offer. 

-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3174
- Joined: Wed Aug 19, 2009 12:23 pm
- x 141
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
but as i pointed out 8 of those 11 were from one injury last year. to me that is not injury prone but rather a guy who had an injury. a guy could get hurt in training camp and miss all 16 games...does that make him injury prone? what if in the previous five seasons he had missed 4 more games? so 20 games missed in 6 seasons. is that really injury prone?mrc44 wrote: Missing 11 games due to injuries in the last two seasons tends to make me believe he is injury prone. His age is not a concern to just the casual fan. The NFL is becoming a faster game with stronger players, who hit harder and harder. At the age of 25, a man's body is fully grown and the older you get after that, the more fragile you get. I dont understand what being a casual fan has to do with age concerns. It would be different if he was 29 and he had no injury history.
no biggie...just different viewpoints i guess.
i'm ready for a beer.
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
@StribDW: I asked Frazier if Cassel signing revived temptation of Webb to WR: "I'm not thinking that way. Things could change. But I see him as a QB."
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
dead_poet wrote:
unbelievable
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1144
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 9:14 am
- Location: Mitchell, SD
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
I agree, they'll still address WR in the draft. But let's not forget Greg Childs, and Chris Summers, they are still competing for a spot.Eli wrote: Absolutely. This changes nothing in their draft plans. The WR lineup still looks like this:
Greg Jennings
Jerome Simpson
Jarius Wright
Stephen Burton
They'll draft a WR in the first round. Period. If they draft a decent one, he'll just be coming into his own at about the same time Greg Jennings is spending most Sundays on the sidelines in street clothes.
From the Fjords of ValHalla
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Not like we're missing out on anything by keeping Webb at QB.
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Why does Fraizer keeps saying stupid sh%t like this? Remember his comment about our DBs a few years ago? Fine, if he doesnt want Webb as a WR, just say so. But dont say you see him as a QB. That shows utter ignorance.dead_poet wrote:
-
- Starter
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
PurpleKoolaid wrote: Why does Fraizer keeps saying stupid sh%t like this? Remember his comment about our DBs a few years ago? Fine, if he doesnt want Webb as a WR, just say so. But dont say you see him as a QB. That shows utter ignorance.
and yet, the vikings continue to improve, and good moves continue to be made both during and after the seasons. Its probably just more of a "I don't give a flying eff" So he just says something off the cuff. Its not like a bunch of FA are reading that and going "wow, lez must have a low football IQ not going there."
I would bet the odds of Webb seeing the field as a QB again are about as high as if you were the game day coach
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Oh, they are just as happy as pigs in .........Mothman wrote: LOL! I'm sure that news will just delight Packers fans.

Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
You know what my fear is? They cut Webb and he goes to some other team and becomes a top WR.PurpleKoolaid wrote: Why does Fraizer keeps saying stupid sh%t like this? Remember his comment about our DBs a few years ago? Fine, if he doesnt want Webb as a WR, just say so. But dont say you see him as a QB. That shows utter ignorance.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
From everything I've heard and read about Frazier, he is the furthest thing from ignorant. He's very consistent in how he approaches matters such as these and changing his message just to appease the fanbase would be irrelevant in how he wants to coach his team.PurpleKoolaid wrote: Why does Fraizer keeps saying stupid sh%t like this? Remember his comment about our DBs a few years ago? Fine, if he doesnt want Webb as a WR, just say so. But dont say you see him as a QB. That shows utter ignorance.
Until this team gets their 3rd (viable) quarterback and for competition purposes going into Summer...I see no problems with him saying this. His actions speak much louder than his words.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Can anyone name me a single position that they think Webb could be put in and be better than someone currently on the roster or someone we could replace him with in FA?
If you can name me one position were he wouldn't be an utter last resort to play him in, I am all for keeping him. I wish the kid all the luck in the world, he seems like a hard worker with a good personality. But he isn't talented enough for what Childress tried to force him to be.
If you can name me one position were he wouldn't be an utter last resort to play him in, I am all for keeping him. I wish the kid all the luck in the world, he seems like a hard worker with a good personality. But he isn't talented enough for what Childress tried to force him to be.
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Maybe we can trade him to Seattle. They need a wildcat type QB to back up Wilson.80 PurplePride 84 wrote:Webb is not a WR right now because he can't catch and runs poor routes. What's the sense of changing him now? Did he getter better at those things while being a QB for 3 years? Can he fix them in one off-season? Doubt it.
The guy is a Wildcat QB and that is it. I think they should try to take advantage of his athleticism on returns but really he's a man without a position.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Vikings vs Packers (again) for Jennings
Trade him if you can. If he can't play another position...cut him.