CharVike wrote: ↑Tue Sep 24, 2019 5:51 pm
Take Mack off that defense and they become middle of the road. Mack is impressive and you need to keep bodies on him. Not one but multiple guys. Otherwise say good night. We all know our interior line blows but our tackles better get ready. There hands will be full. That's why this idiot OC we have needs to stick with what we do best. Bang the ball. If he decides to become a passing team this week we will get crushed. I can see it now. Cousins back under heavy pressure look out for Mack... Fumble Bears ball. That's what will happen. People will say throw it short. Do people think the Bears are that stupid. They will crowd the LOS. We have two very good WRs but we don't have a guy that can blow the top off. The lid will be shut. They can bring guys up and they will. That's why we need to pound the ball all day. Wear them out. Let the know we are coming. With that OC idiot he will throw on the first play and Mack will destroy Reiff or whatever his name is and bye bye football at that point. Bears ball or they will score a TD. Here's what I would do. Use 1 WR no FB and just pound it. Bring in an extra OL for the FB. Don't stop. Wear the clock out and pound. Make them sorry we ever showed up.
I agree with your take on the Bears' defensive strategy. Packers used a high-pressure crowded front a lot and it seemed to work, at least better than what the Falcons and the Raiders managed. Plus, that is what the Bears defense is designed to do.
But I disagree on a couple of other things, starting with the Vikings OC. Not sure why you're calling him an idiot. For the most part, his playcalling has mirrored a lot of what you're recommending the Vikings do. Maybe not the "heavy" formation with a single WR, but in terms of run-pass percentage, it's been heavy run, especially on first down. Lots of play action as well when the Vikings do pass, and I think the play selection overall has been balanced and unpredictable. In short, while Stefanski might not be a genius, I don't think the playcalling has been that bad, certainly not bad enough to call him an idiot.
Second thing I disagree on is the ability to get deep over the top. I agree that the Vikings don't have burners at WR, but both Thielen and Diggs have shown an ability to get deep. Further, I think Irv Smith can too. In fact, I think Smith's ability to get deep is the most under-utilized part of the Vikings offense so far. Smith can run. Maybe he can't necessarily outrun NFL defensive backs, but if the Vikings can create matchups where Smith has a LB on him, I'd say chuck it deep and see if he can go get it.
The biggest challenge going deep against the Bears is going to be time to let the routes develop, especially if the Bears are going all in and coming after Cousins. But having an effective run threat should temper that a bit, as should fatigue if the Vikings keep drives going and can tire the Bears out a bit later in the game. Last year, the Vikings offense couldn't stay on the field and the Bear defense never got tired. If the Vikings can run it and keep them on the field with some nice, long drives, especially if the Vikings defense can get the Bear offense off the field quickly, that will greatly favor the Vikings as the game wears on.
So yeah, if the Vikings fall behind early like they did against the Packers or can't sustain drives (either running or passing) early, that will play into the Bears' hands. I think the core approach that has been so successful for the Vikings will continue - heavy dose of run sprinkled with play action passes to the short and medium portions of the field. Avoid killer mistakes and the Vikings should have a great chance of winning provided the defense and special teams do their parts. I don't think any drastic change in approach is necessary against the Bears defense. Solid execution will be, though, at least if the Vikings hope to win comfortably as they have against some lesser opponents.