Offseason Thread

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

StumpHunter wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:01 pm
makila wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 12:24 pm

Wow. He's on his final deal, wonder if they've already talked about an extension for him with Chicago. I'd part with a fourth for him if he had agreed on an extension.
Unfortunately, even if we had wanted to trade for him, there was really nothing we could have used to make a trade that would have been better than a 4th, or not way too much to give up.
Sure there was.

Chicago gave up a 2026 fourth. We’ve got all our 2026 picks.

I didn’t even know the Chiefs were shopping him. This sucks.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

Good grief. As if things couldn’t get worse.

Seattle just traded Geno Smith to the Raiders for a 2025 3rd round pick.

The Vikings didn’t use the franchise tag for Sam Darnold because they couldn’t find a trade partner … but Seattle could?

This tells me that at least the Raiders saw Geno Smith, who will be 35 this season, as more valuable than Sam Darnold. I know that Pete Carroll has history with Smith, but really? Geno Smith? For a third?

First Thuney to the Bears, then Smith to the Raiders. Sure hope Kwesi has a great plan because it’s not apparent at this point.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9791
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by Cliff »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 8:12 am Good grief. As if things couldn’t get worse.

Seattle just traded Geno Smith to the Raiders for a 2025 3rd round pick.

The Vikings didn’t use the franchise tag for Sam Darnold because they couldn’t find a trade partner … but Seattle could?

This tells me that at least the Raiders saw Geno Smith, who will be 35 this season, as more valuable than Sam Darnold. I know that Pete Carroll has history with Smith, but really? Geno Smith? For a third?

First Thuney to the Bears, then Smith to the Raiders. Sure hope Kwesi has a great plan because it’s not apparent at this point.
Seems like it bodes well if the Vikings are hoping to resign Darnold for a 1 or 2 year deal. Another team out of the bidding pool. Perhaps the plan is to get him for significantly less than the franchise tag.

I still think to some degree franchising players is against the team's overall philosophy.
User avatar
40for60
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2018 12:37 pm
x 57

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by 40for60 »

Cliff wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 9:15 am
J. Kapp 11 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 8:12 am Good grief. As if things couldn’t get worse.

Seattle just traded Geno Smith to the Raiders for a 2025 3rd round pick.

The Vikings didn’t use the franchise tag for Sam Darnold because they couldn’t find a trade partner … but Seattle could?

This tells me that at least the Raiders saw Geno Smith, who will be 35 this season, as more valuable than Sam Darnold. I know that Pete Carroll has history with Smith, but really? Geno Smith? For a third?

First Thuney to the Bears, then Smith to the Raiders. Sure hope Kwesi has a great plan because it’s not apparent at this point.
Seems like it bodes well if the Vikings are hoping to resign Darnold for a 1 or 2 year deal. Another team out of the bidding pool. Perhaps the plan is to get him for significantly less than the franchise tag.

I still think to some degree franchising players is against the team's overall philosophy.
Reports are Darnold will end up with the Seahawks. It makes sense as why would they trade Geno without any other option?


Tag and trade is tricky. I would rather they didn’t rather than end up holding the bag.
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3713
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by StumpHunter »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 8:03 am
StumpHunter wrote: Wed Mar 05, 2025 7:01 pm
Unfortunately, even if we had wanted to trade for him, there was really nothing we could have used to make a trade that would have been better than a 4th, or not way too much to give up.
Sure there was.

Chicago gave up a 2026 fourth. We’ve got all our 2026 picks.

I didn’t even know the Chiefs were shopping him. This sucks.
I saw that later. A 4th in 2026 is the same value as a 5th in 2025 and this was a huge miss at a significant need by our GM.

Especially considering Thuney can play LT in a pinch and we might need a starting LT to start the season.
cogitator
Veteran
Posts: 266
Joined: Tue Mar 14, 2006 2:06 pm
Location: Denver
x 46

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by cogitator »

Just saw a tweet that said Steelers expected to make an offer to Darnold. I guess that means both Justin Fields and Russell Wilson didn't work out as they'd hoped. Same tweet said still a good chance he signs with Seattle.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9791
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by Cliff »

Vikings re-signing RB Aaron Jones to 2-year, $20M deal
StumpHunter
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3713
Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
x 646

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by StumpHunter »

Jones back on a 2 year deal worth 20 million, with 13 million guaranteed.

Insane money to spend on a RB who will be 31 by the end of the year, and just more evidence that Kwesi has no idea what he is doing. Due to his complete lack of foresight at RB, he had nothing at RB, and overpaid an aging one to keep him in house. Why give Jones a 1 year deal last year if you know you have nothing in 2025 and don't plan on drafting a RB in 2024? Pure incompetence.
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3981
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm
x 808

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by CharVike »

40for60 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 7:42 pm
Cliff wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 9:15 am

Seems like it bodes well if the Vikings are hoping to resign Darnold for a 1 or 2 year deal. Another team out of the bidding pool. Perhaps the plan is to get him for significantly less than the franchise tag.

I still think to some degree franchising players is against the team's overall philosophy.
Reports are Darnold will end up with the Seahawks. It makes sense as why would they trade Geno without any other option?


Tag and trade is tricky. I would rather they didn’t rather than end up holding the bag.
Geno requested a trade. He turned down a 2 year offer from the Hawks. The guy threw 21 TDs and 15 INTs last year. Why would any team give up anything for that garbage. I thought the guy was playing great. I could see if he was 25 and starting his climb. It's the complete opposite.
CharVike
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3981
Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2019 5:28 pm
x 808

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by CharVike »

StumpHunter wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:32 pm Jones back on a 2 year deal worth 20 million, with 13 million guaranteed.

Insane money to spend on a RB who will be 31 by the end of the year, and just more evidence that Kwesi has no idea what he is doing. Due to his complete lack of foresight at RB, he had nothing at RB, and overpaid an aging one to keep him in house. Why give Jones a 1 year deal last year if you know you have nothing in 2025 and don't plan on drafting a RB in 2024? Pure incompetence.
Might as well sign Akers also. That money is pure stupidity. Just like Davenport was.
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

StumpHunter wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:32 pm Jones back on a 2 year deal worth 20 million, with 13 million guaranteed.

Insane money to spend on a RB who will be 31 by the end of the year, and just more evidence that Kwesi has no idea what he is doing. Due to his complete lack of foresight at RB, he had nothing at RB, and overpaid an aging one to keep him in house. Why give Jones a 1 year deal last year if you know you have nothing in 2025 and don't plan on drafting a RB in 2024? Pure incompetence.
I honestly don’t get this one.

Aaron Jones is a great dude. A locker room galvanizer. A 1,000-yard rusher. A guy with 1,500 yards from scrimmage. But he’ll turn 31 during the season. He showed a decided lack of burst the second half of 2024. You can’t give him more than 10-12 touches a game, or he’ll break down. Because of that, he’s a guy you bring back for $2 million, not 20.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9791
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by Cliff »

J. Kapp 11 wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 6:14 pm
StumpHunter wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:32 pm Jones back on a 2 year deal worth 20 million, with 13 million guaranteed.

Insane money to spend on a RB who will be 31 by the end of the year, and just more evidence that Kwesi has no idea what he is doing. Due to his complete lack of foresight at RB, he had nothing at RB, and overpaid an aging one to keep him in house. Why give Jones a 1 year deal last year if you know you have nothing in 2025 and don't plan on drafting a RB in 2024? Pure incompetence.
I honestly don’t get this one.

Aaron Jones is a great dude. A locker room galvanizer. A 1,000-yard rusher. A guy with 1,500 yards from scrimmage. But he’ll turn 31 during the season. He showed a decided lack of burst the second half of 2024. You can’t give him more than 10-12 touches a game, or he’ll break down. Because of that, he’s a guy you bring back for $2 million, not 20.
I agree with it being a bit of a "desperation" move. He's the top free agent RB which drives up the price. It would have been nice to get younger at the position.

On the flip side, he also had the most yards from scrimmage of any player on the Vikings last season and the 8th most yards from scrimmage of any player in the league.

With 306 touches it's not an exaggeration to say Jones was a key piece of the 2024 Vikings offense.
makila
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:43 pm
x 195

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by makila »

Seems like a lot for Jones at this point in his career, and faded down the stretch.

Metcalf to Steelers. They want to throw deep jump balls it appears. Sam might be a real target of theirs.
Image
makila
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 619
Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2019 8:43 pm
x 195

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by makila »

StumpHunter wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 2:14 pm
J. Kapp 11 wrote: Sat Mar 08, 2025 8:03 am
Sure there was.

Chicago gave up a 2026 fourth. We’ve got all our 2026 picks.

I didn’t even know the Chiefs were shopping him. This sucks.
I saw that later. A 4th in 2026 is the same value as a 5th in 2025 and this was a huge miss at a significant need by our GM.

Especially considering Thuney can play LT in a pinch and we might need a starting LT to start the season.
Yup. We could have made this happen.
Image
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8611
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1069

Re: Offseason Thread

Post by VikingLord »

Cliff wrote: Sun Mar 09, 2025 5:30 pm Vikings re-signing RB Aaron Jones to 2-year, $20M deal
That's a lot of cap for an aging RB no matter how great he is as a teammate. I felt like Jones ability to remain productive dropped off substantially as the year went on, but he's also not a runner who is great at shedding contact or has any burst to get to the second level. In short, he needs effective blocking in front of him.

$13 million of that $20 is guaranteed, so it's not a terrible deal from the Vikings' perspective, but I'd have preferred it to be $10 million with a 2nd year option.
Post Reply