Washington wants a 2nd...to much!Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:09 am Here we go boys!!! Come on Rick get it done!!
ESPN's Courtney Cronin reports the Vikings remain in pursuit of Redskins LT Trent Williams.
Minnesota had previously offered a Day 3 pick to the Redskins last week, but Washington apparently wants a little bit more. The Vikings can make it happen with 12 picks across the next two days, but the Redskins are running out of suitors after the Browns and Bucs both drafted tackles in the first round Thursday night to pretty much eliminate themselves from the Williams sweepstakes. The Vikings don't have much cap space to work with, so Cronin suggests Minnesota could send a pick and incumbent LT Riley Reiff to D.C. for Williams.
Trent Williams
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Trent Williams
- RandyMoss84
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1773
- Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2020 2:12 pm
- x 534
Re: Trent Williams
- VikingsVictorious
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 766
Re: Trent Williams
Trade Reiff. Don't cut him. Washington would be even more idiotic than usual to not want him. He's added value to help get them accept a third and save face rather than demanding a 2nd.fiestavike wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:28 am Might end up having to either rescind the franchise on Harris or cut Reiff in order to afford Williams...possibly both if we want to bring Griffen back too.
- VikingsVictorious
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 766
Re: Trent Williams
A third and Reiff.Texas Vike wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 8:32 am Glad to see that the rumor spread by Dan Patrick, that a first round pick was involved, was debunked.
What do you guys think will get it done? A 4th and Reiff?
- VikingsVictorious
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 766
Re: Trent Williams
I'm not an offensive line guru, but all reports I have heard is he is almost flawless in pass pro, but needs work in the run game.fiestavike wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 11:10 amJosh Jones is a not a first round prospect. He is completely raw in pass sets. There isn't even any tape of him in pass pro that has relevance to what he would be asked to do in the NFL.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1118
Re: Trent Williams
I don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
- VikingsVictorious
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 766
Re: Trent Williams
It makes zero sense to make an offer for Williams and not include Reiff. We can't afford to pay both.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pmI don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
-
- Starter
- Posts: 176
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2018 7:36 am
- x 55
Re: Trent Williams
The Skins have more leverage in this than many folks think. Trent is worth more playing for the Skins this year than what they are likely to get for him. I don't think they consider themselves to be desperate here. If they keep him he pretty much has to play and play well for them if he wants out next year. He will be on his last year of contract and will be playing for his next one. He wants a lot of money, so he'll be forced to perform. If Brucifer was still there, they would keep him out of spite. Not sure spite is a good enough reason though. Unclear how the new regime feels about spite.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pmI don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
- x 646
Re: Trent Williams
Player for player trades are not the norm in the NFL, and players for players at the same position are even less common. There is a good chance Washington does not want to pay Reiff 9 million. It is possible he doesn't fit their scheme, or that they have someone else they would prefer developing on the field.VikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:57 pmIt makes zero sense to make an offer for Williams and not include Reiff. We can't afford to pay both.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pm
I don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
The Vikings might also like Reiff as a LG, since they currently don't have appear to have a good one.
Williams, Reiff, Bradbury, Samia, ONeil has the potential to be the best line in the NFL. It also has the potential to be very weak up the middle, but if I had to bet I would put a lot of money on the interior of Reiff, Bradbury in his second year and Samia being a lot better than last year's.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3716
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2018 5:55 am
- x 646
Re: Trent Williams
They could get a 3rd round compensatory pick if he walks after 2020 anyway. That isn't as valuable as a 4th rounder this year, but they could keep him and still get something out of it. Plus, they might prefer to keep him and hope some team's LT gets hurt before or early in the season and that they could get more for him then.Fat Stupid Loser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:07 pmThe Skins have more leverage in this than many folks think. Trent is worth more playing for the Skins this year than what they are likely to get for him. I don't think they consider themselves to be desperate here. If they keep him he pretty much has to play and play well for them if he wants out next year. He will be on his last year of contract and will be playing for his next one. He wants a lot of money, so he'll be forced to perform. If Brucifer was still there, they would keep him out of spite. Not sure spite is a good enough reason though. Unclear how the new regime feels about spite.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pm
I don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
-
- Starter
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:27 am
- x 93
Re: Trent Williams
I’d give a second for him in a heartbeat. Hypothetically, if he was available in the second round of the draft knowing he was going to be a six time pro bowler, you’d take him. I just hope Rick doesn’t outsmart himself. If we could get it done with Reiff and a 3rd, it would be a great trade. To me, if you get in a track meet, you’ve got to have a great Oline. Cousins needs time or I don’t care who we draft.
- VikingPaul73
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3371
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
- x 141
Re: Trent Williams
Good post, and I like the look of that OL....but how can they afford Williams without getting rid of Rieff?StumpHunter wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:11 pmPlayer for player trades are not the norm in the NFL, and players for players at the same position are even less common. There is a good chance Washington does not want to pay Reiff 9 million. It is possible he doesn't fit their scheme, or that they have someone else they would prefer developing on the field.VikingsVictorious wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:57 pm
It makes zero sense to make an offer for Williams and not include Reiff. We can't afford to pay both.
The Vikings might also like Reiff as a LG, since they currently don't have appear to have a good one.
Williams, Reiff, Bradbury, Samia, ONeil has the potential to be the best line in the NFL. It also has the potential to be very weak up the middle, but if I had to bet I would put a lot of money on the interior of Reiff, Bradbury in his second year and Samia being a lot better than last year's.
Also, I still really really hope they draft an OG tonight!!
-
- Starter
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2020 10:27 am
- x 93
Re: Trent Williams
FSL, you have a great perspective on Washington as we both have followed them for years. Any feel for Danny’s spite level and ego these days?Fat Stupid Loser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:07 pmThe Skins have more leverage in this than many folks think. Trent is worth more playing for the Skins this year than what they are likely to get for him. I don't think they consider themselves to be desperate here. If they keep him he pretty much has to play and play well for them if he wants out next year. He will be on his last year of contract and will be playing for his next one. He wants a lot of money, so he'll be forced to perform. If Brucifer was still there, they would keep him out of spite. Not sure spite is a good enough reason though. Unclear how the new regime feels about spite.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pm
I don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks
Re: Trent Williams
Just sign Peters to a one or two year deal draft a guard and sign G Kline and be done with this...everyone says Peters is injury prone but what else is out there who can protect Cousins?
- VikingsVictorious
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4294
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2019 7:27 pm
- x 766
Re: Trent Williams
I wouldn't stake my life on him not playing for them, but I would be shocked. All that holding on to him will do is hurt both him and them. If the Vikings are low-balling them they need to stop.Fat Stupid Loser wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 1:07 pmThe Skins have more leverage in this than many folks think. Trent is worth more playing for the Skins this year than what they are likely to get for him. I don't think they consider themselves to be desperate here. If they keep him he pretty much has to play and play well for them if he wants out next year. He will be on his last year of contract and will be playing for his next one. He wants a lot of money, so he'll be forced to perform. If Brucifer was still there, they would keep him out of spite. Not sure spite is a good enough reason though. Unclear how the new regime feels about spite.Pondering Her Percy wrote: ↑Fri Apr 24, 2020 12:49 pm
I don’t think that is necessarily it. It could be a 3rd. Either way, they are running out of options so they are going to have to cave at some point. I wouldn’t mind sending the later of the two 3rds we have. But I think we’re almost forced to include a player unless we’re planning on a post June 1 cut for reiff. If a player is included, we’d have to give up less pick wise. But by the sounds of it we’re only offering picks