What's the least you would take for Patterson?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

What's the least you would take for Patterson?

1st rounder
0
No votes
2nd rounder
0
No votes
3rd rounder
3
10%
4th rounder
8
26%
5th rounder
8
26%
6th rounder
3
10%
7th rounder
5
16%
wouldn't trade him
4
13%
 
Total votes: 31

fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by fiestavike »

S197 wrote: Even if he's not here next year and his production doesn't improve, he still might be good for a TD kick return or two. Or some solid field position. That can be a game changer and probably not what you would get out of a late round pick that would probably struggle to make the team.

His return abilities alone could sway a win or two and that alone makes him worth not taking anything you can get.
Or...he could get stripped again by Mason Crosby :oops:

That had to be a low moment for Cordarelle.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
purpletinted66
Starter
Posts: 170
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by purpletinted66 »

eh, why trade him again? the dude's all legs, just put the ball in his bread basket every once in a while and keep the cameras rolling: i dont see why he cannot be an effective weapon if not a predator in the overall offensive scheme. so he's a bit non-conformist, no biggy, he has given props to the team, and am not aware of one negative instance: I bet he would thrive on some more credit.
Image
Image
Hunter Morrow
Hall of Famer
Posts: 5692
Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
x 16

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by Hunter Morrow »

6th is the absolute lowest. I'd be more up for a 5th for sure.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by losperros »

purpletinted66 wrote:eh, why trade him again? the dude's all legs, just put the ball in his bread basket every once in a while and keep the cameras rolling: i dont see why he cannot be an effective weapon if not a predator in the overall offensive scheme. so he's a bit non-conformist, no biggy, he has given props to the team, and am not aware of one negative instance: I bet he would thrive on some more credit.
:appl:

Absolutely correct.
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by halfgiz »

Seattle is probably looking for a receiver now. Could slick Rick work another Harvin deal?
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by fiestavike »

halfgiz wrote:Seattle is probably looking for a receiver now. Could slick Rick work another Harvin deal?
Seattle does like to trade 1st round picks! That would be amazing. I think he would work out better for them than Percy Harvin did. :thumbsup:
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
SP1966
Franchise Player
Posts: 491
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2014 12:28 pm

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by SP1966 »

Image

The guy hasn't shown the desire to be great, or even good. He relies on his natural ability which isn't enough in the NFL... so honestly, I don't care, they could simply cut him and I wouldn't be bothered.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by jackal »

I didn't think of that. Lockette their returner just retired it would be great to dump him off, especially
for a decent conditional pick, to the Seachickens
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
x 1
Contact:

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by Funkytown »

jackal wrote:I didn't think of that. Lockette their returner just retired it would be great to dump him off, especially
for a decent conditional pick, to the Seachickens
I think you're thinking of Tyler Lockett. He's fine. It was Ricardo Lockette who had to retire.
Image
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: What's the least you would take for Patterson?

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

A 4th for CP84 wouldnt be bad, seeing as neither Norv nor Zimmer will let him play. But I bet they waste a lot of time on Der German, who can run 1 and a half routes. This still burns me.
Post Reply