Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Good move, Vikes. 
-
PurpleMustReign
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
I love this move. He has been a great slot receiver and knows how to get open. Kudos to Rick, etc. For getting it done.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
Pondering Her Percy
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1118
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Woah! I like the guy and it's a good deal and all but I don't see any way he's the best WR on our teamPurple bruise wrote:IMO he may be the best Receiver on this team. Great to see him get this deal.I still remember that 87 yard catch and run against the Jets last year to win that game.
http://www.sportingnews.com/nfl/story/2 ... ridgewater
http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-high ... yard-catch
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
S197 wrote:Makes me wonder what Childs thinks when he reads this stuff. I'm sure he's very happy for his teammate but he was taken before Wright if I'm not mistaken. If not for such unfortunate events, it could have very well been him.
I steal feel for this guy, a real case of a guy with very good talent and work ethic, who's body just let him down. He was recently in my hometown of Winnipeg, trying out for our CFL club, but he was released in training camp due to a torn Achilles. It's hard not to wonder what his career could have been if not for the injuries

- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Wright was the only WR on the 53 that did not have a contract for next year. This is a good move on the Vikings part. They lock him up for 4 more years without a lot of cap hit in the future if he does not pan out. (Which I doubt)
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
Purple bruise
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Which one is betterPondering Her Percy wrote: Woah! I like the guy and it's a good deal and all but I don't see any way he's the best WR on our team
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
- VikingPaul73
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3371
- Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
- x 141
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
well said. I like Wright and like this move. Also this gives them some level of flexibility to shed Wallace's huge contract next offseason if he doesn't have a good year or never builds good chemistry with Teddy.Raptorman wrote:Wright was the only WR on the 53 that did not have a contract for next year. This is a good move on the Vikings part. They lock him up for 4 more years without a lot of cap hit in the future if he does not pan out. (Which I doubt)
That said I hope Wallace justifies his contract this season and they keep him for the remainder of his contract. I really don't want to go into the draft next year with any excuse NOT to go OL-OL-OL Rds 1-3
-
Pondering Her Percy
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1118
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Wallace!! And Johnson and Wright are pretty even right now but after this season, Johnson will quickly pass him IMO.Purple bruise wrote: Which one is better
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
I realize I'm in the minority but it's games like tonight that are the reason why I'm not high on wright. His MO is he disappears for long stretches at a time. He'll have a great game but 4-5 games in between where he gets 10-20 yards per game. Or zero like tonight.
To get a big paycheck, even as a #3, you need to be more consistent.
To get a big paycheck, even as a #3, you need to be more consistent.
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
I didn't see much effort to get him involved.S197 wrote:I realize I'm in the minority but it's games like tonight that are the reason why I'm not high on wright. His MO is he disappears for long stretches at a time. He'll have a great game but 4-5 games in between where he gets 10-20 yards per game. Or zero like tonight.
To get a big paycheck, even as a #3, you need to be more consistent.
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
100% agreed, just think that money (along with Walsh's bs contract ext) could've gone to Harrison's extension or oline helpS197 wrote:I realize I'm in the minority but it's games like tonight that are the reason why I'm not high on wright. His MO is he disappears for long stretches at a time. He'll have a great game but 4-5 games in between where he gets 10-20 yards per game. Or zero like tonight.
To get a big paycheck, even as a #3, you need to be more consistent.
I can't imagine Wright being able to do anything Diggs can't do, Diggs has better footwork, speed, a better prospect, etc. He'd just have to get open a few times to replace Wright at the bare minimum. Oh and catch 3rd down passes short of the sticks but Rudolph has that down and Ellison is a work in progress on the catching part but his 3 yard routes when we need 5 are crisp as can be.
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
That may very well be the case, it's hard to say without watching the tape but it was clear the receivers were having problems getting open tonight and I think he only had 1 target. That's an issue whoever is to blame. I will say I saw a lot of 3 receiver sets tonight so he should have had a good amount of snaps.Mothman wrote: I didn't see much effort to get him involved.
-
PurpleMustReign
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Norv was terrible tonight. How does AD only get 10 carries?Mothman wrote: I didn't see much effort to get him involved.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
You answered your own question.PurpleMustReign wrote: Norv was terrible tonight. How does AD only get 10 carries?
-
dead_poet
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Vikings re-sign Jarius Wright
Inexcusable. Establish the run and things can flow from there. That's how the team is built. He tried getting too cute and contrarian because he thought the 49ers would be keying in on a run-first game plan. This was a failure on all levels. Zimmer is right; the team bought into the hype without earning anything. Come to Jesus meeting coming early.PurpleMustReign wrote: Norv was terrible tonight. How does AD only get 10 carries?
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly