The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

saint33
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1653
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:28 am

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by saint33 »

I think one thing that is getting a little overlooked too is the trade down. We still have the same total number of picks we had coming in, but in essence we moved down from our 4th round pick into the 5th round in order to turn our 2nd rounder into a first. I really like out aggressive nature in the draft. We're not afraid to make moves and yet again we've been able to coax the browns to move up one spot for a guy they likely would get if they stayed pat.

7 first round picks in 3 years has to be a record
Image
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by mondry »

And that's the biggest reason I talk about not reaching based on your draft board. If you rate players a certain way, other teams likely have them rated some what similar. It's simply about not spending #8 or #9 overall on a QB when you can spend #32 on them. No way Barr is there at #32 so by masterfully playing the game this way, Spielman gets both.
King James
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
Location: Alabama

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by King James »

I'm so excited. Just when you doubt Spielman, he makes another sweet move. In my opinion that was a dumb move from the Browns to move up one spot for a guy they would have still gotten if they remained patience. Then again this is the Browns we're talking about. I love how Spielman has been doing in the draft lately. Who would've thought we would have gotten Teddy at 32 and we almost possibly had a shot at Manziel too.

I think Spielman learned after that Ponder pick how to be patient. So far it has been paying off.
Slick Rick
Transition Player
Posts: 394
Joined: Thu Oct 24, 2013 8:40 am

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Slick Rick »

I think we'll see the Vikes move around again tonight. Maybe trade a 3rd for a couple of 4ths, or a 3rd and a 6th or something. That's how Rick rolls (no pun intended), he likes to optimize his chances of getting a combination of quality and quantity. Not sure what happened in 2010 and 2011, but to be fair those were two #### drafts, and Griffen/Rudy/Fusco have a chance to redeem both drafts. Thought Mistral Raymond might be a solid player for a minute too, but you can't win 'em all.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Eli »

Ultimately, the moves up, down, sideways will be completely forgotten and the opinion on this draft, just like any other, will come down to how good are the players that the Vikings choose. Seven first round draft picks in three years? Great. Where are those seven players in another couple of years is going to be the real question.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Mothman »

mondry wrote:And that's the biggest reason I talk about not reaching based on your draft board. If you rate players a certain way, other teams likely have them rated some what similar. It's simply about not spending #8 or #9 overall on a QB when you can spend #32 on them. No way Barr is there at #32 so by masterfully playing the game this way, Spielman gets both.
... and if Seattle had decline to trade or traded their pick to someone else and Bridgewater had gone to Houston or another team? Not so masterful. Rick Spielman played a risky game last night and I give him a tremendous amount of credit for what he was able to pull off but it was risky.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Mothman »

Jeffbleedspurple wrote:My question is why would have Bridgewater slipped in to the 2nd rd with the rest of the questionable left over QB's if he's so great? :confused:
Drew Brees did slipped to the second round too... draft position doesn't tell us if a QB will be great or not.
User avatar
Laserman
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7355
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:13 am
Location: Ft Walton Beach, Florida
x 14

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Laserman »

Jeffbleedspurple wrote:My question is why would have Bridgewater slipped in to the 2nd rd with the rest of the questionable left over QB's if he's so great? :confused:
We have to thank the news media for blowing a poor Pro Day WAY out of proportion so Teddy would drop that far. One day is judged over an entire college career? And So many teams fell for it? Finally the media is nice to the VIKES
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9872
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 550

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Cliff »

Mothman wrote: ... and if Seattle had decline to trade or traded their pick to someone else and Bridgewater had gone to Houston or another team? Not so masterful. Rick Spielman played a risky game last night and I give him a tremendous amount of credit for what he was able to pull off but it was risky.
I don’t see it as being that risky of a move. Moving up for Bridgewater was a luxury … but I feel it’s obvious they would have been ok taking one of the lower tier QBs if it came to that or plugging another defensive hole with the second round pick.

So either move up and get a player you think is worth it … or stay put and get a player you think is worth it there. In their minds Barr was the better value at 8 so they took him.
Webbfann
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 990
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Webbfann »

Laserman wrote:
We have to thank the news media for blowing a poor Pro Day WAY out of proportion so Teddy would drop that far. One day is judged over an entire college career? And So many teams fell for it? Finally the media is nice to the VIKES
In fact, we have so much to thank the media and talky-tweety birds for! So much unsubtantiated speculative garbage (from "sources") that passes for "news".
mmvikes
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 500
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:42 am
Location: Naperville, IL

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by mmvikes »

Mothman wrote: Drew Brees did slipped to the second round too... draft position doesn't tell us if a QB will be great or not.
True. Dan Marino had 5 other QBs drafted ahead of him. Two, good, three not so good. One was even a DII I think
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Mothman »

Cliff wrote:I don’t see it as being that risky of a move. Moving up for Bridgewater was a luxury … but I feel it’s obvious they would have been ok taking one of the lower tier QBs if it came to that or plugging another defensive hole with the second round pick.

So either move up and get a player you think is worth it … or stay put and get a player you think is worth it there. In their minds Barr was the better value at 8 so they took him.
Obviously... but if your take is accurate, it sure seems like a half-hearted way for a team to pick their QB of the future.
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Texas Vike »

Mothman wrote: Obviously... but if your take is accurate, it sure seems like a half-hearted way for a team to pick their QB of the future.
I think instead of half-hearted, i would describe it as strategic; they maximized the value of their picks and correctly predicted that they could get a QB that they would be satisfied with late in the first.

There's always a bit of "revisionist history" that goes on after picks are made: meaning, teams talk up the player they chose, making it sound like he was THEIR guy and they are SO PLEASED to have gotten him where they did. I think they DO like Teddy a lot, but obviously they were willing to risk NOT getting him. They were OK with the prospect of having to sit at 40 and take another option.

I think another huge benefit of taking your QB at 32 instead of 8/9 is that there's a heck of a lot less pressure on him and the organization for him to quickly establish himself as THE GUY in order to justify the pick. There's less cognitive dissonance among the fan base.
Webbfann
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 990
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Webbfann »

Texas Vike wrote:
I think they DO like Teddy a lot, but obviously they were willing to risk NOT getting him. They were OK with the prospect of having to sit at 40 and take another option.

I think another huge benefit of taking your QB at 32 instead of 8/9 is that there's a heck of a lot less pressure on him and the organization for him to quickly establish himself as THE GUY in order to justify the pick.
Exactly.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: The brilliance of Rick Spielman on Day One

Post by Mothman »

Texas Vike wrote:I think instead of half-hearted, i would describe it as strategic; they maximized the value of their picks and correctly predicted that they could get a QB that they would be satisfied with late in the first.

There's always a bit of "revisionist history" that goes on after picks are made: meaning, teams talk up the player they chose, making it sound like he was THEIR guy and they are SO PLEASED to have gotten him where they did. I think they DO like Teddy a lot, but obviously they were willing to risk NOT getting him. They were OK with the prospect of having to sit at 40 and take another option.
Exactly. I think that's a kinder way to say the same thing. :)

In other words, I'm not really being critical of the team here so much as questioning their conviction regarding these QBs.
I think another huge benefit of taking your QB at 32 instead of 8/9 is that there's a heck of a lot less pressure on him and the organization for him to quickly establish himself as THE GUY in order to justify the pick. There's less cognitive dissonance among the fan base.
The latter is clearly true but in the end, they're still going to end up with a LOT riding on their choice of QB here which is why I find the approach so intriguing.
Post Reply