ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by dead_poet »

80 PurplePride 84 wrote: Significantly more, even coming off a torn ACL.

Simpson will probably get a another one or two year deal making similar money. Some team out there will overpay Maclin. Probably around at least 5m per from 2-5 years.
I'd be surprised if Maclin gets more than a one-year "prove it" contract coming off his ACL. Probably re-ups with Philly.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by dead_poet »

Edited to include today's spotlight: offensive tackles.

Note: I'm really curious to see how this unit responds to a change in blocking style (zone to power). I haven't read any analysis on this yet. Anyone offer up any thoughts?
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Texas Vike »

dead_poet wrote:Edited to include today's spotlight: offensive tackles.

Note: I'm really curious to see how this unit responds to a change in blocking style (zone to power). I haven't read any analysis on this yet. Anyone offer up any thoughts?
No thoughts on that difference, but I do wonder why the writer is choosing, except for QB, the positions that are least in need of a fix. There just isn't much to say about any of the positions that he has "analyzed" so far, except, "they are set at this position".
User avatar
Crax
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Location: Utah
x 31

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Crax »

Texas Vike wrote: but I do wonder why the writer is choosing, except for QB, the positions that are least in need of a fix.
Doing the easy ones first, hoping people will keep coming back(more clicks) to see the ones that are more interesting
mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by mosscarter »

wouldn't take simpson to the gallows for a dui millions of people have them (including our beloved former president george w.). its the drugs that are concerning and the fact he likely broke probation.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1513
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
x 90

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by chicagopurple »

give Simpson a little more time and money and he will end up running over some little kid. we dont need him.
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Texas Vike »

Crax wrote: Doing the easy ones first, hoping people will keep coming back(more clicks) to see the ones that are more interesting
He's running the risk of losing this fish due to not setting the hook soon enough… just not enough to entice return visits for me. Seems unnecessary to even write about RB and OT, IMO. Maybe I'm just a picky fish. :D
S197
Fenrir
Posts: 12790
Joined: Fri Dec 22, 2006 1:28 pm
Location: Hawaii
x 662

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by S197 »

Webbfann wrote:Has Childs ever played a snap? He's no reason to let any proven receivers get away because we have no idea what he can do. I wasn't happy about us giving Simpson a first chance (which I know is really his second overall), but after this year I think he deserves one and only one second chance with us. DUI is no laughing matter though, so I say that with considerable reservation. One more slip up and I'd be happy to slam the cell shut on him myself.
Nope, not even a preseason game. Blew his knee out in a scrimmage.
HardcoreVikesFan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6652
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
x 21

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by HardcoreVikesFan »

dead_poet wrote:Edited to include today's spotlight: offensive tackles.

Note: I'm really curious to see how this unit responds to a change in blocking style (zone to power). I haven't read any analysis on this yet. Anyone offer up any thoughts?
It is a curious decision. I am a fan of the zone blocking scheme. Kalil and Sullivan fit the zone scheme to a T. However, Loadholt is grossly missed cast in it. I think a power man scheme can work. Who knows? Maybe it will allow Adrian to just run without him trying to be so patient. If we do run a power man scheme, we have to upgrade the guard spot.


Regardless of what happens offensive line scheme wise, my biggest hope is that Matt Kalil will bounce back immensely. This past year was a disappointment for him and for fans of playing ability (me). :(
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by dead_poet »

HardcoreVikesFan wrote:Regardless of what happens offensive line scheme wise, my biggest hope is that Matt Kalil will bounce back immensely. This past year was a disappointment for him and for fans of playing ability (me). :(
Me too, though it seemed like he was getting better towards the end there. Hopefully he uses that momentum to have a great season. Glad to hear Davidson is apparently returning. Continuity should help and Davidson is a pretty darn good position coach.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Eli »

I'd like to see the Vikings re-sign J'Marcus Webb as a backup OT. I was skeptical at first about Webb, but I think he played well in Loadholt's absence. None of the backups the Vikings have had at OT in recent years inspire much confidence - guys like DeMarcus Love, Patrick Brown and Kevin Murphy are all practice squad level players.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by dead_poet »

Eli wrote:I'd like to see the Vikings re-sign J'Marcus Webb as a backup OT. I was skeptical at first about Webb, but I think he played well in Loadholt's absence. None of the backups the Vikings have had at OT in recent years inspire much confidence - guys like DeMarcus Love, Patrick Brown and Kevin Murphy are all practice squad level players.
The same could be said about Webb. He's a turnstile. Every time I saw him enter the game the very next play the defender got past him. I was higher on Love than I ever was with Brown, Murphy or Webb. But there's a reason these guys aren't starting. We absolutely need tackle depth, so I'm not sure we're in a great position to be picky. It wouldn't be a bad idea to grab a late-round developmental guy.

As far as FAs, Rams' Roger Saffold may reach free agency. He'd be a good swing guy. Played mostly tackle but did very well in the run game when he switched to guard. Might be priced out of our league, though. A more realistic "next tier" option would be Jason Fox, Winston Justice and Anthony Collins. We might have a good shot at Collins, actually, as he's a Bengal. He also has ties to Jerome Simpson (he was at Simpson's house when Simpson got in trouble for having drugs delivered). He'd be an upgrade "swing" tackle over any of the others. Though he's kind of a knucklehead.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Webbfann
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 990
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 8:37 pm

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Webbfann »

mosscarter wrote:wouldn't take simpson to the gallows for a dui millions of people have them (including our beloved former president george w.). its the drugs that are concerning and the fact he likely broke probation.

I wouldn't take them to the gallows but I'd let them sit in jail a while for repeat offenses. Unlike DUI its not often that people die because someone smoked a joint.
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by dead_poet »

Edited with today's installment
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: ESPN's Vikings "Position by Position Outlook"

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:The same could be said about Webb. He's a turnstile.
That sums up Webb's game in a word and it's word I heard associated h with him often when he was with the Bears. The Vikings need to find someone better than Webb to be their top backup tackle.

Regarding today's entry: it's rare for this board to come close to 100% agreement about anything but I suspect we could come close when it comes to the need to replace Johnson and upgrade the left guard spot. Goessling said the Vikes might use a mid-round pick on a guard and that wouldn't surprise me at all. However, depending on the talent available, I wouldn't mind if they used a relatively high pick on the position. Good blocking is crucial, especially for a team that has a premier running back and issues at QB.
Post Reply