Hey, don't overlook that he is 6-3+ and does not have a noodle arm. That makes him a great QB doesn't itsoflavike wrote:Yes, another QB with lousy accuracy... that's what we need!![]()
![]()


Moderator: Moderators
Hey, don't overlook that he is 6-3+ and does not have a noodle arm. That makes him a great QB doesn't itsoflavike wrote:Yes, another QB with lousy accuracy... that's what we need!![]()
![]()
indianation65 wrote:Tebow isn't even connected to the Vikes, and he still gets hammered in this forum. Poor guy, some cats never get a break!
...wisdom
I'd rather not have either one of them.PurpleMustReign wrote:
Because morons on this board keep trying to justify why he would be a good pickup for the Vikings. I would MUCH rather have Joe Webb as the backup.
True. I wonder what Randall Cunningham is up to?Mothman wrote: I'd rather not have either one of them.
I would agree that Tebow is better than Webb, but not by the margin one would hope the backup QB situation would improve. While I don't understand the national fascination with TT, he doesn't inspire hate or anything else from me. I just don't think he's a very effective QB in the long run.Just Me wrote: I would submit Ponder is better than Tebow, but Tebow is better than Webb. So I agree it is a needless media distraction for a pretty marginal gain, but to say it is NO gain is not entirely accurate. The best analogy (as previously posted by another) is that it would be Favre part 2, only without the quarterback skills to go with it. I'm inclined to pass...
All good points, and I agree. It does beg the question: Given that Webb is worse (Passer Rating) statistically than Tebow, how does Webb make an NFL Roster? It's nearly a rhetorical question, and Webb brings that athletic aspect to the postion which one hopes may translate into a better game later, but I hope for the Viking's sake neither Tebow nor Webb are on the roster for next year...J. Kapp 11 wrote:Honestly, I don't understand the Tebow love. Never will.
If you take away the John 3:16 eyeblack and all the hoopla surrounding his squeaky clean image and just look at him as a quarterback, there is no way he makes an NFL roster.
He "led" the Broncos to the playoffs? Are you kidding me? They got there in spite of him. The Broncos "won" a title in the worst division in football, backing in at 8-8 and losing in Week 17 to the Chiefs. They lost four of their last five games. They scored as many as 20 points four times in Tebow's 13 starts. They "beat" Miami in spite of one of the worst performances by a winning QB in NFL history, all because the Dolphins couldn't cover an onside kick. He completed 46 percent of his passes, had a QBR in the low 70s. Two players on the entire team had as many as 20 receptions. Every game I watched of this team, I kept asking myself, "How are they even in the game?"
And none of this even considers the circus that travels with Tebow.
I guess you all know where I stand.
That's a very good question.Just Me wrote: All good points, and I agree. It does beg the question: Given that Webb is worse (Passer Rating) statistically than Tebow, how does Webb make an NFL Roster? It's nearly a rhetorical question, and Webb brings that athletic aspect to the postion which one hopes may translate into a better game later, but I hope for the Viking's sake neither Tebow nor Webb are on the roster for next year...
Webb is NOT any better at passing than Tebow and I am not implying Tebow is better than Webb either they are equally inept .J. Kapp 11 wrote: That's a very good question.
I know a lot of Tebow acolytes will scoff at this, but not only is Webb much faster than Tebow, he's also a better passer.
Of course, that's kind of like being the world's tallest midget.
Dude, chill. I'm pretty much agreeing with you. Arguing who's the better passer between Tim Tebow and Joe Webb is like arguing who's hotter between Rosanne Barr and Rosie O'Donnell.Lash Man wrote:Webb is NOT any better at passing than Tebow and I am not implying Tebow is better than Webb either they are equally inept .