There is a reason he isn't a starter, I agree. I also acknowledged he probably won't have more than one good game, but with no time to prepare for him, he may actually perform better than Ponder (for this game). I'm not asserting he should replace Ponder, I'm saying that those who are proclaiming "all is lost!" are overreacting just a tad. I actually think our chances to win this game just went up. IF we win and play next week, I hope Ponder will be ready, because if Joe has to play 2 in a row we may be in trouble...Orion wrote: Meh so what. Career, Webb is 3-5 in TD-interception. He hasn't attempted a single pass this season and there's a reason he isn't a starter. I hope I'm wrong and he has a huge game though.
Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Card
Moderator: Moderators
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
I've told people a million times not to exaggerate!
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Pelissero:
"Thought Dom Capers would heat up Ponder all night in passing situations. With Webb, there's danger there. Just ask Gunther Cunningham."
"Thought Dom Capers would heat up Ponder all night in passing situations. With Webb, there's danger there. Just ask Gunther Cunningham."
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
I think you're right. Joe Webb has a much stronger arm than Ponder... they have to respect the long ball... and Webb is dangerous as hell when he pump fakes and then takes off running. Their safeties and LB's will be going nuts trying to contain him.... and then we have this guy named Peterson, or something like that. He's pretty good, too.John_Viveiros wrote:I think the Ponder we saw in the last game was superior to the Webb we saw the last couple years. Even so, Webb presents a matchup nightmare for the Packers. They wanted to blitz Ponder and play man against our relatively weak receivers. But Webb is incredibly hard to bring down, and if he breaks free, he'll run for 50 or 60 yards with none of the defenders looking at him, but instead following the receivers.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Hot damn, I forgot how fast he was.Just Me wrote:I'm telling you: Watch This!
I'm just worried he's going to be a tad bit rusty and this could be ugly if he starts turning the ball over. And if he gets injured we get to see us some MBT. Would love to see a repeat of the Eagles game a few years ago.
"Our playoff loss to the Vikings in '87 was probably the most traumatic experience I had in sports." -- Bill Walsh
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
My thoughts as well. A cold weather game may suit us better with Adrian/Webb than Adrian/Ponder.Just Me wrote: There is a reason he isn't a starter, I agree. I also acknowledged he probably won't have more than one good game, but with no time to prepare for him, he may actually perform better than Ponder (for this game). I'm not asserting he should replace Ponder, I'm saying that those who are proclaiming "all is lost!" are overreacting just a tad. I actually think our chances to win this game just went up. IF we win and play next week, I hope Ponder will be ready, because if Joe has to play 2 in a row we may be in trouble...
A QB picking up 1st downs during 3rd and 5+ situations is a killer to defenses.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
$hit just got real
wow this game is going to be very interesting.

wow this game is going to be very interesting.
-
- Pro Bowl Elite Player
- Posts: 987
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 7:51 pm
- Location: Waiting for hell to freeze over
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
reaction on the packer forums to webb starting...
"oh crap"

"oh crap"

Purple Pride till the end.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
So, how many of you would have preferred Sage Rosenfels in this particular situation?
Not me.
Not me.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
I have had this Webb one on for awhile. I think Kyle Rudolph has a HUGE game today.
Minnesota Vikings fan from Missouri!
Skol!
Skol!
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Me neither.soflavike wrote:So, how many of you would have preferred Sage Rosenfels in this particular situation?
Not me.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
it's been so long since i've seen him play....i really can't say.soflavike wrote:So, how many of you would have preferred Sage Rosenfels in this particular situation?
Not me.
While it may work to have Webb tonight , anything beyond that worries me. Ponder's elbow issue is the same thing he had in college. If the Vikes should pull this out I hope Ponder can go next game.
big IF, I know.....
-
- Starter
- Posts: 191
- Joined: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Well, This is the EXACT reason I am so happy we have a QB like Webb as the back up. I think this will be the Defining argument for or against "Change of pace" QBs being on the roster.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Eliot wrote:I have had this Webb one on for awhile. I think Kyle Rudolph has a HUGE game today.
Yea, maybe a bunch of little roll-out passes.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9601
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
The 49ers tried the change-of-pace and stuck with it... they liked it.PurpleJarl wrote:Well, This is the EXACT reason I am so happy we have a QB like Webb as the back up. I think this will be the Defining argument for or against "Change of pace" QBs being on the roster.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
-
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Wild Car
Yeah, bt Kapernick is WAY better of a passer than Webb. Although, in his defense, Webb hasn't played this season so you never know. But I don't think Kapernick will be the QB in SF next season.soflavike wrote: The 49ers tried the change-of-pace and stuck with it... they liked it.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018