Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

me4get wrote: NO RECEIVERS.
Yeah its the receivers. Right. All those INTs and underthrown balls were just my imagination. Or him continually staring down 1 receiver and throwing to him no matter what.
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by Texas Vike »

I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.
User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9602
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
x 24

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by soflavike »

VikingLord wrote:
That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder. :rofl:
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
yezzir
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3868
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:05 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by yezzir »

CalVike wrote: This is another case where fans get to engage in pointless speculation. NFL teams don't play to lose, ever. Not should they.
Yes they do. Impossible to prove, but if the coaches job is secure, then definitely.
User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9602
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
x 24

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by soflavike »

Texas Vike wrote:I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.
So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
yezzir
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3868
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:05 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by yezzir »

soflavike wrote: That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder. :rofl:
Boom.
FK28
Rookie
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by FK28 »

Texas Vike wrote:I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.

OMG OMG OMG ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!! WHAT?
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8653
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1083

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by VikingLord »

CalVike wrote: This is another case where fans get to engage in pointless speculation. NFL teams don't play to lose, ever. Not should they.
How about playing to assess your roster going into the offseason so you have a better idea of what you need to do?

I don't see that as playing to lose - I see that as playing smart with an eye on the future.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

soflavike wrote: That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder. :rofl:
honest to god I can read Ds better then Ponder. When has he ever backed out of a run to a pass play for a single coverage on a WR? Never. He only audibles to a run, even with 11 stacked in the box. He has his receiver picked before the game, stares him down, rollout, and throws to him no matter what. Even if someone else is wide open.
User avatar
soflavike
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9602
Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
x 24

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by soflavike »

Todd R wrote:No ponder does recognize blitzes and formations, that does not mean he responds well to them at all times.
Oh, so he recognizes what's going on and then craps his pants and does something stupid. Perfect.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
User avatar
VikingLord
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8653
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
x 1083

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by VikingLord »

Todd R wrote: No ponder does recognize blitzes and formations, that does not mean he responds well to them at all times.
In fact, Sub-100 recognizes blitzes and pressure that isn't even there. He's so good at recognizing it, he sees it well before anyone else does, including the defenders.
FK28
Rookie
Posts: 37
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 7:23 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by FK28 »

soflavike wrote: So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.
this is exactly what i am saying! everybody has decided he cant qb! decision made without a trial. guilty till proven innocent without the chance to show proof!
User avatar
Texas Vike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4673
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
x 405

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by Texas Vike »

soflavike wrote: So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.

No. I'd love to give Webb a shot. We need to assess if he is progressing and is worth investing time and resources on.

But I am 100% certain that Wilf, Speilman, Frazier, and Musgrave will not be convinced that we need to move past Ponder until he does this sort of thing another 4 or 5 times.
yezzir
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3868
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2007 3:05 pm

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by yezzir »

Seattle just won. Crap.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13

Post by Mothman »

S197 wrote: Jim, I get what you're saying, to me it's just coming off sounding nit picky. As Joe Buck mentioned teams with a 200-yard rusher is 57-2 (now 3) since 2000. The defense, while not great, did get critical stops, pressure on Rodgers, and turnovers. Ponder basically handed the football to Peterson and gave away points to the Packers. When one player so overwhelmingly underperforms, the focus is going to be on him.
Ponder also threw a TD pass to Rudolph and was something like 4 out of 5 on a scoring drive that let the defense finally get some rest after their bad start.

I'm not trying to nitpick. The focus should be on Ponder. He made the most glaring errors. I just draw the line at blaming the entire loss on one player when one player clearly wasn't responsible for the entire loss. I don't think it's that picky to be critical of a defense that allowed Green Bay to possess the ball for 38+ minutes. The defense gave up an 11 minute scoring drive in the 4th quarter when the Vikings were trailing by just 6 points. I realize Ponder's INTs were brutal but how is that excusable in a 6 point game?
The coaches, the defense, etc. all have a part in the loss but it's fractional compared to the play of Ponder.
I'm not even willing to go that far. It's never okay for a defense to allow an opponent to possess the ball for 11 straight minutes and then score in the 4 quarter of a tight game. As far as I'm concerned, that's as bad as throwing a dumb INT. Unfortunately for Ponder, it's not as bad as throwing two dumb INTs. ;)
Post Reply