Yeah its the receivers. Right. All those INTs and underthrown balls were just my imagination. Or him continually staring down 1 receiver and throwing to him no matter what.me4get wrote: NO RECEIVERS.
Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Moderator: Moderators
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
- x 405
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9602
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder.VikingLord wrote:

*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Yes they do. Impossible to prove, but if the coaches job is secure, then definitely.CalVike wrote: This is another case where fans get to engage in pointless speculation. NFL teams don't play to lose, ever. Not should they.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9602
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.Texas Vike wrote:I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Boom.soflavike wrote: That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Texas Vike wrote:I just don't think Webb is going to be a suitable pro QB either. I REALLY want them to be utterly and thoroughly convinced that Ponder is NOT the answer, so I hope he finishes the year.
OMG OMG OMG ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!! WHAT?
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1083
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
How about playing to assess your roster going into the offseason so you have a better idea of what you need to do?CalVike wrote: This is another case where fans get to engage in pointless speculation. NFL teams don't play to lose, ever. Not should they.
I don't see that as playing to lose - I see that as playing smart with an eye on the future.
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
honest to god I can read Ds better then Ponder. When has he ever backed out of a run to a pass play for a single coverage on a WR? Never. He only audibles to a run, even with 11 stacked in the box. He has his receiver picked before the game, stares him down, rollout, and throws to him no matter what. Even if someone else is wide open.soflavike wrote: That's a hell of an indictment... Stevie Wonder reads defenses better than Ponder.
- soflavike
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9602
- Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:38 pm
- Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
- x 24
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Oh, so he recognizes what's going on and then craps his pants and does something stupid. Perfect.Todd R wrote:No ponder does recognize blitzes and formations, that does not mean he responds well to them at all times.
*********
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
A die-hard Vikings fan in South Florida
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8653
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 1083
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
In fact, Sub-100 recognizes blitzes and pressure that isn't even there. He's so good at recognizing it, he sees it well before anyone else does, including the defenders.Todd R wrote: No ponder does recognize blitzes and formations, that does not mean he responds well to them at all times.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
this is exactly what i am saying! everybody has decided he cant qb! decision made without a trial. guilty till proven innocent without the chance to show proof!soflavike wrote: So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.
- Texas Vike
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4673
- Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 9:52 am
- x 405
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
soflavike wrote: So, you don't even want to give him a shot to prove his worth in a real game situation? I'm pretty sure that Ponder is not a suitable QB... I don't need to see any more of his play.
No. I'd love to give Webb a shot. We need to assess if he is progressing and is worth investing time and resources on.
But I am 100% certain that Wilf, Speilman, Frazier, and Musgrave will not be convinced that we need to move past Ponder until he does this sort of thing another 4 or 5 times.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Seattle just won. Crap.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 13
Ponder also threw a TD pass to Rudolph and was something like 4 out of 5 on a scoring drive that let the defense finally get some rest after their bad start.S197 wrote: Jim, I get what you're saying, to me it's just coming off sounding nit picky. As Joe Buck mentioned teams with a 200-yard rusher is 57-2 (now 3) since 2000. The defense, while not great, did get critical stops, pressure on Rodgers, and turnovers. Ponder basically handed the football to Peterson and gave away points to the Packers. When one player so overwhelmingly underperforms, the focus is going to be on him.
I'm not trying to nitpick. The focus should be on Ponder. He made the most glaring errors. I just draw the line at blaming the entire loss on one player when one player clearly wasn't responsible for the entire loss. I don't think it's that picky to be critical of a defense that allowed Green Bay to possess the ball for 38+ minutes. The defense gave up an 11 minute scoring drive in the 4th quarter when the Vikings were trailing by just 6 points. I realize Ponder's INTs were brutal but how is that excusable in a 6 point game?
I'm not even willing to go that far. It's never okay for a defense to allow an opponent to possess the ball for 11 straight minutes and then score in the 4 quarter of a tight game. As far as I'm concerned, that's as bad as throwing a dumb INT. Unfortunately for Ponder, it's not as bad as throwing two dumb INTs.The coaches, the defense, etc. all have a part in the loss but it's fractional compared to the play of Ponder.
