A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/
It's probably fan perception that first-rounders are expected to play from day 1. I think that's probably the hope, but a lot depends on readiness and depth. Newman didn't have terrible coverage there, did he?PurpleKoolaid wrote: You dont agree? Waynes was supposed to be starter from day one CB....kinda like Peters. But instead they have a 50 year old CB trying to cover Britt.
Yes he is. When he starts getting all riled up, the rest of the D plays better.dead_poet wrote:Joseph is a beast.
It was a bad throw into double coverage, penalty or not - that's my point.sneaxsneax wrote: It was a meaningless throw, teddy is not lucky on that one. It never would have happened without the penalty and we scored a few plays later. What are you blabbering about.
According to who? I doubt they ever intended to start Waynes from day one. I think Zimmer wanted the veteran who knew his system starting and wanted to give Waynes time to develop.PurpleKoolaid wrote: You dont agree? Waynes was supposed to be starter from day one CB...
Digging the hard counts/altered snap counts and Turner's game plan thus far. Let's get 7 here.@GoesslingESPN Teddy Bridgewater 8-for-10 for 79 yards in the first quarter. Hit 8 different receivers, targeted 9.
Skoltastic_Voyage wrote:Oakland on top of Steelers, what a fahking year.
nm that
@Andrew_Krammer: Norv's "equal-opportunity offense" has resulted in 8 completions to 8 different receivers in the first quarter.
Yeah you're right that's what I do.PurpleKoolaid wrote:
Do you watch games now just to #### on Teddy? What do you want to happen?
I was simply saying it was yet another bad overthrow. What do I want to happen? I want him to complete a damn deep pass to a wide open WR. Don't you want that to happen to? Or do you want to continue to make excuses every time he throws a bad passObvious to everyone except the blind zebra who was staring at it.TSonn wrote:Clear hold on Wright there.