Are the Vikings now done with FA?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:Done with FA? Nope! You guys! LB problem solved!
LOL! Well, perhaps not solved ... ;)

I had a feeling they would re-sign Mitchell. The move makes sense.
HardcoreVikesFan
Hall of Famer
Posts: 6652
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
x 21

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by HardcoreVikesFan »

dead_poet wrote:Done with FA? Nope! You guys! LB problem solved!

Marvin Mitchell - LB - Vikings

Vikings re-signed LB Marvin Mitchell.

A reserve linebacker and special teamer, Mitchell started one game in 2012, but played only 46 snaps on defense. He'll serve in a similar role in 2013.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
Hahaha. I like the move though. Marvin is good at what he does and we needed outside linebacker depth.
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.
Angels Wings
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 700
Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:39 pm
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
x 34

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Angels Wings »

dead_poet wrote:Done with FA? Nope! You guys! LB problem solved!

Marvin Mitchell - LB - Vikings

Vikings re-signed LB Marvin Mitchell.

A reserve linebacker and special teamer, Mitchell started one game in 2012, but played only 46 snaps on defense. He'll serve in a similar role in 2013.
Source: Ian Rapoport on Twitter
CHAMPIONSHIP!!!!!

:rock:
For those with wings, fly to your dreams
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by mondry »

omg we signed someone to play special teams wtf is spielman thinking! We should have cut all of them and just had walsh kick it out of the endzone every play so we could sign cruz and fitzgerald!1@@!!!1!111
hibbingviking
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7157
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 8:53 pm
Location: bakersfield california

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by hibbingviking »

headless_norseman wrote: Ogle yes. Teo, no. Chances are he's a 2 down player.
:thumbsup:
Teo is too slow to play mlb in the tampa 2. so is urlacher at his advanced age imo
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by dead_poet »

Darrius Heyward-Bey - WR - Free Agent
The St. Paul Pioneer Press thinks the Vikings could "try to get" free agent Darrius Heyward-Bey on a "low-cost deal."

Since being released by the Raiders almost three weeks ago, Heyward-Bey has visited the Colts and Lions. He left both cities without a contract in hand.

The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick, and he'd at least be a better field-stretcher than Jerome Simpson.
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press Mar 31 - 10:44 AM
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9805
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Cliff »

dead_poet wrote:Darrius Heyward-Bey - WR - Free Agent
The St. Paul Pioneer Press thinks the Vikings could "try to get" free agent Darrius Heyward-Bey on a "low-cost deal."

Since being released by the Raiders almost three weeks ago, Heyward-Bey has visited the Colts and Lions. He left both cities without a contract in hand.

The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick, and he'd at least be a better field-stretcher than Jerome Simpson.
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press Mar 31 - 10:44 AM
I was wondering why the Vikings weren't showing interest in this guy. Does he have character concerns? Seems like the kind of potential that would be good to give a shot to ... but I don't know a whole lot about him.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by losperros »

Cliff wrote: I was wondering why the Vikings weren't showing interest in this guy. Does he have character concerns? Seems like the kind of potential that would be good to give a shot to ... but I don't know a whole lot about him.
Good question. I know more about him as a college player than what he's done as a pro. Is there anyone out there that has watched Heyward-Bey's pro career?

Also, I guess I'm wondering why the PP says: "The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick." Is it because he can stretch the field or is it because of the way the Vikings play offense? Or both?
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9805
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Cliff »

losperros wrote:
Good question. I know more about him as a college player than what he's done as a pro. Is there anyone out there that has watched Heyward-Bey's pro career?

Also, I guess I'm wondering why the PP says: "The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick." Is it because he can stretch the field or is it because of the way the Vikings play offense? Or both?
I took it to mean because of the lack of overall depth at the position.
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by PurpleMustReign »

dead_poet wrote:Darrius Heyward-Bey - WR - Free Agent
The St. Paul Pioneer Press thinks the Vikings could "try to get" free agent Darrius Heyward-Bey on a "low-cost deal."

Since being released by the Raiders almost three weeks ago, Heyward-Bey has visited the Colts and Lions. He left both cities without a contract in hand.

The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick, and he'd at least be a better field-stretcher than Jerome Simpson.
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press Mar 31 - 10:44 AM

I'm ok with that, if they sign him. Clearly there isn't any substance to the story since there is no sources mentioned, not even an "unnamed" one.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
Funkytown
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4044
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
Location: Northeast, Iowa
x 1
Contact:

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Funkytown »

dead_poet wrote:Darrius Heyward-Bey - WR - Free Agent
The St. Paul Pioneer Press thinks the Vikings could "try to get" free agent Darrius Heyward-Bey on a "low-cost deal."

Since being released by the Raiders almost three weeks ago, Heyward-Bey has visited the Colts and Lions. He left both cities without a contract in hand.

The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick, and he'd at least be a better field-stretcher than Jerome Simpson.
Source: St. Paul Pioneer Press Mar 31 - 10:44 AM
The SPPP is a little wacky. This is kind of random. I wouldn't believe much of what they have to say. Not that long ago they were suggesting Cassel was possibly "too good to be a backup" and "he brings solid credentials and has had several outstanding seasons." Yeah? Outstanding? Several?

With that being said, Heyward-Bey on a cheap deal wouldn't hurt. We need depth at the position anyway. He's underachieved in a big way out there in Oakland, but who DOES succeed and achieve in Oakland? I think a fresh start could be good for him. He's still young--and has a lot to prove. I wouldn't hate the move. I still think SPPP is pulling crap outta their butt, though.
Image
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Mothman »

losperros wrote:Good question. I know more about him as a college player than what he's done as a pro. Is there anyone out there that has watched Heyward-Bey's pro career?

Also, I guess I'm wondering why the PP says: "The Vikings make a ton of sense as a landing spot for the former No. 7 overall pick." Is it because he can stretch the field or is it because of the way the Vikings play offense? Or both?
Actually, that comment about the Vikings making a ton of sense as a landing spot didn't come from the PP but from whoever wrote the Rotoworld blurb dead_poet posted. Confusing, eh? ;) The Pioneer Press comment came in the context of a piece Ben Goessling wrote about what the Vikings could still do in the draft and free agency to address holes remaining on the roster. In the section of the article about WRs he wrote:

http://www.twincities.com/sports/ci_229 ... ttle-money
Although the Vikings have the flexibility to look elsewhere in the first round, it seems hard to believe they wouldn't acquire another receiver -- particularly if they can find a big wideout to stretch the field. There's enough depth at receiver in this draft that the Vikings could come back to the position in the second or third round if they don't take one in the first round.

Wide receivers coach George Stewart had good things to say about USC's Robert Woods in an interview with the Los Angeles Times last week, and California's Keenan Allen could be an option for the Vikings in the first round. The Vikings also could try to get former Raiders receiver Darrius Heyward-Bey on a low-cost deal. But after signing Jennings, they at least have someone they can count on at the position.
In other words, there's really nothing more to the idea that the Vikings could sign Heyward-Bey than if you or I had written it here. Goessling is just pointing out that Heyward-Bey is out there, unsigned, and one of many options for the Vikes.
DanAS
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:29 am
x 1

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by DanAS »

MelanieMFunk wrote:
With that being said, Heyward-Bey on a cheap deal wouldn't hurt. We need depth at the position anyway. He's underachieved in a big way out there in Oakland, but who DOES succeed and achieve in Oakland? I think a fresh start could be good for him. He's still young--and has a lot to prove. I wouldn't hate the move. I still think SPPP is pulling crap outta their butt, though.
Heyward-Bey does get open -- and I mean on deep as well as intermediate routes. The problem is that he has two of the worst hands you'll see for an NFL receiver. Can he improve those hands? I don't know, but he has been in the league for a while already and he remains undependable. That said, if the price is low enough, maybe the deal could be defended.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by losperros »

Cliff wrote: I took it to mean because of the lack of overall depth at the position.
That makes sense. The Vikings definitely need to improve their depth at CB.
Mothman wrote:In other words, there's really nothing more to the idea that the Vikings could sign Heyward-Bey than if you or I had written it here. Goessling is just pointing out that Heyward-Bey is out there, unsigned, and one of many options for the Vikes.
I see. Thanks for that, Jim.

Given what Dan said about Heyward-Bey's bad hands, I would actually be surprised if they sign the guy. I still think the Vikings are going to pick two WRs in the draft, with one being in the first two rounds and the second pick later. I think at least one of them will be someone who can stretch the field. Maybe both will be.
Purple bruise
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3565
Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm

Re: Are the Vikings now done with FA?

Post by Purple bruise »

Heyward-Bey to the Colts
Phillip B Wilson @pwilson24
Colts confirm deal with WR Darrius Heyward-Bey. Details to be announced shortly. Team confirmed in call a few minutes ago
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!


Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Post Reply