Re: Buccaneers @ Vikings Gameday Discussion Thread -- Week 8
Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:21 am
Is it just me, or am I still seeing the same blown coverage problem that we had last year?
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/
I want some of what you are smoking/drinking/shooting! The last three games have drained that kind of optimism out of me.Eliot wrote:You know, we are 5-3. People think we should be 2-6! We beat the 49ers! I still won't be surprised to see us with 9-10 wins at the end of the season.
Actually, I distinctly remember a play where they blitzed and Simpson cut off his fade route short for a quick pass (like he should), and the DB kept going on the fade route, and Ponder threw the fade. Initially the announcers were blaming the miscommunication on Simpson, but then after watching the replay they were like, "good job by Simpson cutting off his route for the blitz, Ponder needs to recognize that". Not saying our receivers are good, and they messed up their share last night, but I'd put the majority of the blame on Ponder.petev_sj wrote:The thing that stuck out the most for me in this game is how the receivers don't turn around when there is an all out blitz. They just run straight ahead and not go to the vacant spot.
We did get caught off guard and Frazier is accepting responsibility for it, but TB is not a vastly underrated team. I've watched them play; they are a mediocre team in a subpar division.doa2k wrote:Vikings got completely caught on their heels last night by a team thats vastly underated and has been improving and gelling for weeks and simply steamrolled over them.
Its gut check time in V-land with the hardest part for the schedule ahead of them.
On a play like that, it's just two guys thinking differently and they need to get on the same page. Simpson saw the blitz and cut his route short. Ponder saw the blitz and knew he had Simpson in single coverage on the outside. He threw the route he expected to be there and it's just as legitimate in response to a blitz as what Simpson did. In theory, it's not a bad choice by either player. What's bad is that they made different choices. Determining who was to blame would require knowing what they're coached to do in that situation. We don't have that information and I doubt Mayock does either.LA Viking wrote:Actually, I distinctly remember a play where they blitzed and Simpson cut off his fade route short for a quick pass (like he should), and the DB kept going on the fade route, and Ponder threw the fade. Initially the announcers were blaming the miscommunication on Simpson, but then after watching the replay they were like, "good job by Simpson cutting off his route for the blitz, Ponder needs to recognize that". Not saying our receivers are good, and they messed up their share last night, but I'd put the majority of the blame on Ponder.
The problem is they made their choices at the same time. Had Simpson cut off a second earlier perhaps Ponder would have seen it. Instead, Ponder is already in his throwing motion when Simpson stops, but maybe I'm misremembering that.Mothman wrote: On a play like that, it's just two guys thinking differently and they need to get on the same page. Simpson saw the blitz and cut his route short. Ponder saw the blitz and knew he had Simpson in single coverage on the outside. He threw the route he expected to be there and it's just as legitimate in response to a blitz as what Simpson did. In theory, it's not a bad choice by either player. What's bad is that they made different choices. Determining who was to blame would require knowing what they're coached to do in that situation. We don't have that information and I doubt Mayock does either.
That's how I remember it too.Cliff wrote:The problem is they made their choices at the same time. Had Simpson cut off a second earlier perhaps Ponder would have seen it. Instead, Ponder is already in his throwing motion when Simpson stops, but maybe I'm misremembering that.