Page 57 of 58
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:08 pm
by King James
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:10 pm
by Raptorman
What's been seen, cannot be un-seen. Thanks for nothing.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:12 pm
by Funkytown
JEC334 wrote: He's definitely gay.
Doubt it. He has a lot of sexy pictures with women, too. Either way, I find my discovery completely hilarious. The guy thinks he's the sexiest man alive. You wouldn't want to see, but I'm telling you, he thinks he's a sexy,
sexy beast. In one picture he's completely naked with just a football over his junk.

I had no idea he was this big of a dork.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:13 pm
by Funkytown
Raptorman wrote:What's been seen, cannot be un-seen. Thanks for nothing.
You'll be alright.

I promise.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:17 pm
by King James
MelanieMFunk wrote:
Doubt it. He has a lot of sexy pictures with women, too. Either way, I find my discovery completely hilarious. The guy thinks he's the sexiest man alive. You wouldn't want to see, but I'm telling you, he thinks he's a sexy,
sexy beast. In one picture he's completely naked with just a football over his junk.

I had no idea he was this big of a dork.
He's probably on the down low. I've seen undercover gay guys take pics with women all the time, just because they're afraid to come out of the closet. I never heard of a straight guy showing off nipple rings.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:23 pm
by Funkytown
JEC334 wrote: He's probably on the down low. I've seen undercover gay guys take pics with women all the time, just because they're afraid to come out of the closet. I never heard of a straight guy showing off nipple rings.

Good call on the nipple rings.
Either way, I'm surprised he wasn't picked up by someone else. He's only 28. Was he even looked at after the Falcons released him? I don't remember hearing anything. It's just odd. You'd think he'd be on a roster somewhere. Maybe he's having a great time with his selfies and boxing.

Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:26 pm
by The Breeze
doooood!! Those pics are so funny.
king of the selfie.....yeah
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:46 pm
by mondry
jeeze, thx Melanie. -_-
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Sun Sep 29, 2013 11:57 pm
by Funkytown
mondry wrote:jeeze, thx Melanie. -_-

You're welcome. I felt bad for a second, but then I remembered that Purplemania has a half-naked picture of AP as an avatar....and then I got over it.

These pictures are way funny. I just
had to share.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 12:21 am
by Hunter Morrow
I coulda went my whole life without seeing Ray Edwards nipple ring selfies...
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 8:58 am
by dead_poet
Back on topic (for christsakes)...
Vikings only played three CBs: Robinson (77), Sherels (77) and Rhodes (55). For first time, LB Bishop (15) played more than Mitchell (10).
DE Griffen played 55 of 79 (70%) snaps,third most on DL behind Allen/Robison. Given every chance this season, paid off on last snap Sunday.
Safety Andrew Sendejo (42) and Mistral Raymond (36) essentially split time in place of the injured Jamarca Sanford. #Vikings
Sunday snapcount: #Vikings WRs: Jennings (36), Simpson (28), Wright (20), Patterson (13), Webb (7).
Good to see Bishop getting more time. But, seriously, what's the deal with Blanton? We have a BIG hole next to Harrison Smith, even
with Sanford.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 9:14 am
by Webbfann
dead_poet wrote:Sunday snapcount: Webb (7).
Idiot coaches.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 10:59 am
by mondry
dead_poet wrote:Back on topic (for christsakes)...
Good to see Bishop getting more time. But, seriously, what's the deal with Blanton? We have a BIG hole next to Harrison Smith, even with Sanford.
Jefferson and Cook were hurt / inactive right? My guess is we just didn't have another CB to even bench Robinson for... it'll be interesting to see what they do when we have another healthy corner, hopefully it isn't Rhodes snaps that reduce if you know what I mean...
Wow didn't realize Griffen was in that much, anyone know how much of that is rotating in for Allen / Robison compared to playing tackle on 3rd and long?
No real complaints about the WR snaps, in fact that's actually about right / how it should be imo. Still a fan of more 3 WR sets, would be interested to see how many snaps Carlson got...
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:29 am
by PurpleMustReign
How has Sendejo been looking? I dont recall any blatant mistake or missed plays by him.
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Posted: Mon Sep 30, 2013 11:36 am
by dead_poet
PurpleMustReign wrote:How has Sendejo been looking? I dont recall any blatant mistake or missed plays by him.
He had four solo tackles and was called for a 15-yard unnecessary roughness penalty (which was borderline if you ask me). The unit as a whole allowed 357 yards passing, including I think four plays of 30+ yards. He's very "meh" and a below-average safety (a solid special teamer, though). I really want to get some answers on Blanton. I'd have to go back to look at the tape and focus on his snaps to give a better evaluation.