He's definitely gay.MelanieMFunk wrote: Speaking of former Vikings, I was sitting here watching the Falcons game and wondering about Ray Edwards. So, I googled him to see what he's been up to and I found these:
You guys probably hate these pictures, but I don't care. I HAD to share because I couldn't stop laughing. LOL. This guy is the KING OF THE SELFIE!!! He has a lot of sexy pictures online, even more naked than these.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Love it. We get it; you're sexy. Now get away from the toilet, and put some clothes on.
Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edition
Moderator: Moderators
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
- Raptorman
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3403
- Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
- Location: Sebastian, FL
- x 67
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
What's been seen, cannot be un-seen. Thanks for nothing.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Doubt it. He has a lot of sexy pictures with women, too. Either way, I find my discovery completely hilarious. The guy thinks he's the sexiest man alive. You wouldn't want to see, but I'm telling you, he thinks he's a sexy, sexy beast. In one picture he's completely naked with just a football over his junk.JEC334 wrote: He's definitely gay.


-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
You'll be alright.Raptorman wrote:What's been seen, cannot be un-seen. Thanks for nothing.


-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1736
- Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:23 pm
- Location: Alabama
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
He's probably on the down low. I've seen undercover gay guys take pics with women all the time, just because they're afraid to come out of the closet. I never heard of a straight guy showing off nipple rings.MelanieMFunk wrote: Doubt it. He has a lot of sexy pictures with women, too. Either way, I find my discovery completely hilarious. The guy thinks he's the sexiest man alive. You wouldn't want to see, but I'm telling you, he thinks he's a sexy, sexy beast. In one picture he's completely naked with just a football over his junk.I had no idea he was this big of a dork.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
JEC334 wrote: He's probably on the down low. I've seen undercover gay guys take pics with women all the time, just because they're afraid to come out of the closet. I never heard of a straight guy showing off nipple rings.

Either way, I'm surprised he wasn't picked up by someone else. He's only 28. Was he even looked at after the Falcons released him? I don't remember hearing anything. It's just odd. You'd think he'd be on a roster somewhere. Maybe he's having a great time with his selfies and boxing.


-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
doooood!! Those pics are so funny.MelanieMFunk wrote: Speaking of former Vikings, I was sitting here watching the Falcons game and wondering about Ray Edwards. So, I googled him to see what he's been up to and I found these:
You guys probably hate these pictures, but I don't care. I HAD to share because I couldn't stop laughing. LOL. This guy is the KING OF THE SELFIE!!! He has a lot of sexy pictures online, even more naked than these.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Love it. We get it; you're sexy. Now get away from the toilet, and put some clothes on.
king of the selfie.....yeah
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
jeeze, thx Melanie. -_-
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4044
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 8:26 pm
- Location: Northeast, Iowa
- x 1
- Contact:
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
mondry wrote:jeeze, thx Melanie. -_-



-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 5692
- Joined: Wed Aug 16, 2006 5:56 am
- x 16
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
I coulda went my whole life without seeing Ray Edwards nipple ring selfies...
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Back on topic (for christsakes)...
Vikings only played three CBs: Robinson (77), Sherels (77) and Rhodes (55). For first time, LB Bishop (15) played more than Mitchell (10).
DE Griffen played 55 of 79 (70%) snaps,third most on DL behind Allen/Robison. Given every chance this season, paid off on last snap Sunday.
Safety Andrew Sendejo (42) and Mistral Raymond (36) essentially split time in place of the injured Jamarca Sanford. #Vikings
Good to see Bishop getting more time. But, seriously, what's the deal with Blanton? We have a BIG hole next to Harrison Smith, even with Sanford.Sunday snapcount: #Vikings WRs: Jennings (36), Simpson (28), Wright (20), Patterson (13), Webb (7).
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Idiot coaches.dead_poet wrote:Sunday snapcount: Webb (7).
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
Jefferson and Cook were hurt / inactive right? My guess is we just didn't have another CB to even bench Robinson for... it'll be interesting to see what they do when we have another healthy corner, hopefully it isn't Rhodes snaps that reduce if you know what I mean...dead_poet wrote:Back on topic (for christsakes)...
Good to see Bishop getting more time. But, seriously, what's the deal with Blanton? We have a BIG hole next to Harrison Smith, even with Sanford.
Wow didn't realize Griffen was in that much, anyone know how much of that is rotating in for Allen / Robison compared to playing tackle on 3rd and long?
No real complaints about the WR snaps, in fact that's actually about right / how it should be imo. Still a fan of more 3 WR sets, would be interested to see how many snaps Carlson got...
-
- Starting Wide Receiver
- Posts: 19150
- Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
- Location: Crystal, MN
- x 114
- Contact:
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
How has Sendejo been looking? I dont recall any blatant mistake or missed plays by him.
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." #SKOL2018
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Steelers@Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread--London Edit
He had four solo tackles and was called for a 15-yard unnecessary roughness penalty (which was borderline if you ask me). The unit as a whole allowed 357 yards passing, including I think four plays of 30+ yards. He's very "meh" and a below-average safety (a solid special teamer, though). I really want to get some answers on Blanton. I'd have to go back to look at the tape and focus on his snaps to give a better evaluation.PurpleMustReign wrote:How has Sendejo been looking? I dont recall any blatant mistake or missed plays by him.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly