fiestavike wrote:
I don't think anyone has contended he's elite. the argument much more seems to be between those who think he is terrible/hasn't shown anything yet and those who think he has played well within the confines of the circumstances (in reality).
You mean those who are judging him on how he's played (reality)
And those who want to make excuses for him and talk about how he *might* play if circumstances were different (fantasy)
Not sure anyone thinks he's terrible. He's better than the previous two guys. And he hasn't shown that much. Maybe that's because of everyone else. Maybe it's because of him. But to assume if he had better receivers, line, and coordinator, he'd be better? Yeah, so would a lot of quarterbacks. This thread was suppose to be about the pro bowl. And it's clear he doesn't belong in the pro bowl, and is only there because a number of other players backed out and there are a lot of horrible QBs in this league, including a couple throwing games away in his own division. Yet for some reason, there has to be an argument made that he is a good QB and belongs in the pro bowl. Not based on stats, or watching him actually play, but based on potential and what could be. The pro bowl, and any award, is suppose to be based on what you did that season, not what you could possibly do. A "Most likely to succeed" award would have been more appropriate.
And that picture of the broken down car could just as easily be applied to the people who want to completely ignore the blown engine while focusing on the number of other problems.
Even if you fix those other problems, you may never be able to get where you want to go.