Re: Nov 1 Trade Deadline
Posted: Wed Oct 28, 2015 2:35 pm
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/
Dude what are you talking about?? Have you watched Kalil this year or do you just not pay any attention?? He's been phenomenal this year.chicagopurple wrote:look at howsucessfull organizations trade, and we havent been one in a long time, know when to trade players at the right time. Khalil is a failure that the organization wont admit....I would trade him in a heart beat. Most everyone else is VERY tradeable. Look at what Dallas did the the Vikes with a big trade for what was the "Best RB in football".....We were gutted for years and they went on to win SuperBowls. Successful teams trade players that are good and about to get BIG contracts...you get good young talent that is cheaper and benefit for a few years. Thats the way it works. You cant be sentimental or expect a player who is really good to spend a whole career with your team. Their contract will balloon and take your team down. I think we all hesitate because we have no confidence that Spielman will get the better end of ANY deal. The one team that we worked some magic on is Seattle and that has been so-so...more that we got rid of many potentially expensive Headaches (literally in Harvins case).
Kalil is one of the top left tackles in the game this year..... what are you smoking! Ship some my way!chicagopurple wrote:look at howsucessfull organizations trade, and we havent been one in a long time, know when to trade players at the right time. Khalil is a failure that the organization wont admit....I would trade him in a heart beat. Most everyone else is VERY tradeable. Look at what Dallas did the the Vikes with a big trade for what was the "Best RB in football".....We were gutted for years and they went on to win SuperBowls. Successful teams trade players that are good and about to get BIG contracts...you get good young talent that is cheaper and benefit for a few years. Thats the way it works. You cant be sentimental or expect a player who is really good to spend a whole career with your team. Their contract will balloon and take your team down. I think we all hesitate because we have no confidence that Spielman will get the better end of ANY deal. The one team that we worked some magic on is Seattle and that has been so-so...more that we got rid of many potentially expensive Headaches (literally in Harvins case).
Matt Khallifa has played well so far this year, which is a wondrous surprise.chicagopurple wrote:Khalil has been as spotty a player as could be. Is he currently doing a good job,yes. Has he shown ANY indication that he is a long term anchor, NO. My only point is that a good GM will trade players WHEN THEY HAVE VALUE...its the only way to get value...holding on to players too long is not the best policy.
Neither is trading away a fairly young guy that's spent time in your system that might actually be good with the hope the draft pick you acquire (which will be lower than what you used to draft him) will supply you with better talent than the hole you're creating.chicagopurple wrote:Khalil has been as spotty a player as could be. Is he currently doing a good job,yes. Has he shown ANY indication that he is a long term anchor, NO. My only point is that a good GM will trade players WHEN THEY HAVE VALUE...its the only way to get value...holding on to players too long is not the best policy.
Exactly, if you traded away your players when they have value you would never have a good team. Kalil made the pro bowl as a rookie, had a bad year, now is in pace for the pro bowl again. Please tell me how he has been bad again?dead_poet wrote: Neither is trading away a fairly young guy that's spent time in your system that might actually be good with the hope the draft pick you acquire (which will be lower than what you used to draft him) will supply you with better talent than the hole you're creating.
Well said.dead_poet wrote: Neither is trading away a fairly young guy that's spent time in your system that might actually be good with the hope the draft pick you acquire (which will be lower than what you used to draft him) will supply you with better talent than the hole you're creating.
fiestavike wrote: Matt Khallifa...
Harris has played well. It's not Harris. It's Clemmings. Watch where most of the pressure is coming from in the run and pass. It's from Clemmings whiffing or simply not holding his block long enough. I've been very impressed with Harris at guard this year. Berger I agree withPurpleKoolaid wrote:Kalil is one of the bright spots. I was agraid he might go bust, but so far he is playing good football. Harris and Berger are not.