2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transactions)

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by mondry »

Mothman wrote:
I find it absurd that I keep being taken to task on a Vikings board for wanting the team to win, for wanting them to be better, as if that's somehow in opposition to what most fans want. It seems utterly ridiculous.
I think the problem you're having is that the team is better, it is winning, they are doing it the right way, it is headed in the right direction, they are building for a long term sustained winner, they did win 11 games when most here predicted 8 at best, they won the division IN Lambeu when no one expected them to even be in the race, they are drafting well and adding young talented players with upside, etc so to criticize them heavily for not advancing in the playoffs or winning the superbowl is extremely harsh.

Your focus is on how they can revert to a losing team and won't have sustained success, that none of the good they did last year matters despite being a made FG away from playing on. Bringing up past examples of the team regressing and saying that's reason enough to believe it can happen again so we shouldn't be excited. You also criticize the way the teams being built despite pick after pick having major positive impact on the team, even in their rookie years in the case of guys like Kendricks, Diggs, Hunter, etc. And why? Because Spielman hasn't spent enough early round picks on the O-line for you and that he selected a QB to build around that you don't personally believe in would be my guess.

You're right that we all want them to win a superbowl and especially have multiple good shots at it, but your opinion that they're going about it the wrong way and building the team wrong and regression is in store after a small window of success is a very small minority and far out there opinion. That's why I think you're drawing so much attention, as they say, the nail that sticks out get's hammered down.

If I'm misrepresenting your ideas / opinions than I apologize.
fiestavike wrote: Its certainly not what I've stated or meant to imply, but at this point the communication break down is so severe I don't see any point in even trying to clarify things.
Probably a better idea to just let it go heh, delete my post if you like Jim!
Last edited by mondry on Mon Mar 14, 2016 7:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by mondry »

Mothman wrote: I wish him good luck (honestly)!

Has anybody heard any news about Matt Asiata?
Seriously, always seemed like a good dude. Was Frazier let go with Lovie or are they reunited?
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Mothman »

mondry wrote:I think the problem you're having is that the team is better, it is winning, they are doing it the right way, it is headed in the right direction, they are building for a long term sustained winner, they did win 11 games when most here predicted 8 at best, they won the division IN Lambeu when no one expected them to even be in the race, they are drafting well and adding young talented players with upside, etc so to criticize them heavily for not advancing in the playoffs or winning the superbowl is extremely harsh.
It seems more like to criticize them at all is being viewed as extremely harsh. Remember that a lot of what you stated above is a point of view, not objective fact. You might think they're doing it the right way, building for a long term sustained winner, etc. but that's just an opinion.
Your focus is on how they can revert to a losing team and won't have sustained success, that none of the good they did last year matters despite being a made FG away from playing on.


I never said none of the good they did last year matters. It matters to me that they won the division, and made the playoffs. It matters to me that they continued to improve on defense.
Bringing up past examples of the team regressing and saying that's reason enough to believe it can happen again so we shouldn't be excited.
I didn't say people shouldn't be excited either. There are legitimate reasons to be excited and, in my opinion, legitimate reasons to be concerned. I feel some of both.
You also criticize the way the teams being built despite pick after pick having major positive impact on the team, even in their rookie years in the case of guys like Kendricks, Diggs, Hunter, etc. And why? Because Spielman hasn't spent enough early round picks on the O-line for you and that he selected a QB to build around that you don't personally believe in would be my guess.

You're right that we all want them to win a superbowl and especially have multiple good shots at it, but your opinion that they're going about it the wrong way and building the team wrong and regression is in store after a small window of success is a very small minority and far out there opinion
That's a misrepresentation. I haven't said regression is in store. I just think that's a very real concern because of the way they've gone about building the team thus far. They've focused heavily on defense and it's worked in the sense that they've built a good defense and last year, they had Adrian Peterson to lean on. However, they've put together a pretty poor offense and you're correct, I have issues with the QB and OL (and good reasons for both) but I also have issues with their reliance on that QB. Once again, they've put all their eggs in one basket at the position. That's troublesome because they don't seem to be learning from past mistakes.

You might think it's out there to suggest they could have a small window of success but right now, whatever window of success they have rests heavily on Bridgewater's advancement and his success will rely heavily on the quality of the OL and WRs. All 3 areas have the potential to go south. In two years we could be celebrating a Super Bowl win or hoping the next man up at QB is "the one" and wondering just what it's going to take to finally get the offense on track. I'm not saying it will go that way but the possibility is quite obviously there and I don't think that's a particularly radical viewpoint.
That's why I think you're drawing so much attention, as they say, the nail that sticks out get's hammered down.

If I'm misrepresenting your ideas / opinions than I apologize.
You misrepresented a few and I've pointed them out. :) No harm done.

I don't mind the attention, It should be pretty clear by now that I'm comfortable defending my viewpoint. What bothers me is the implication that I'll never be happy regardless of the outcomes for the team, that I just assume and expect the worst, etc. Maybe I'm asking too much of people or not communicating effectively enough but when I post about the possibilities of bad situations or worst case scenarios, those aren't predictions, just observations. Like many other fans, I like to play coach and GM and to me, part those jobs, particularly the latter, is to envision potential developments, positive and negative, and prepare for them. I think it's important to have good contingency plans, to build logically, and so on.

I know I appear jaded to some of you but honestly, I'm not. I'm just a product of my experiences. Yes, watching the team lose 4 Super Bowls, 5 conference championships and many more playoff games has been a drag but it's also been fun so while it's left me hungry for that big win, it hasn't turned me into a bitter fan who expects the worst. Believe it or not, I've actually picked up a few things along the way. Experience has benefits as a fan, just like it does as a coach or player. I've seen a lot of football so one reason I don't go head over heels over the kind of development we've seen under Zimmer so far is because this isn't new to me. I've seen Vikes teams with strong defenses and real flaws. I've seen Vikes teams with similar philosophies and consequently, even though this team appears headed in the right direction and I like the head coach, I'm cautiously optimistic whereas you and some other fans seem wildly enthusiastic (and if I'm the one misrepresenting views now, I apologize). You wrote earlier that you don't have the experience of seeing those SB losses or most of the Green era so you can't understand what I'm feeling. However, I can understand how you're feeling because I've felt that way many times about this team. Does that make sense? I'm not trying to give a lecture. :) I just want people to realize that I have a different perspective for a reason and it's not because I'm a cynic or a doomsayer.
Probably a better idea to just let it go heh, delete my post if you like Jim!
Ha! Not necessary. I appreciated it.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Mothman »

mondry wrote:Seriously, always seemed like a good dude. Was Frazier let go with Lovie or are they reunited?
Frazier is now the DB coach for the Ravens:

http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/art ... b0411bc477
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by dead_poet »

Jim, out of curiosity, had Rick spent resources on another higher-round QB and offensive line instead of the defense would you be equally as critical at the franchise for neglecting the defense?

I think many also understand a championship cannot be built in one or two seasons, especially with a young QB. Yes, Rick has been here for longer than two seasons, but I'm referring to the Rick-Zimmer combo. It COULD be trending the other way. Easily. Maybe you're fed up and aren't as patient waiting for a coach-GM plan to come to fruition anymore and want instant Super Bowl. As long of a fan as you've been it's hard to blame you. I just think the majority here have more patience with so many new pieces in place when building a championship squad. Nobody is right or wrong.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Mothman »

dead_poet wrote:Jim, out of curiosity, had Rick spent resources on another higher-round QB and offensive line instead of the defense would you be equally as critical at the franchise for neglecting the defense?
That's a fair question but as I've said before, I think when a team is trying to develop a young QB their first priority needs to be to protect him and surround him with the talent to be successful. Plus, I think the o-line is arguably the most crucial unit on a team (with QB being the most crucial position). In other words, no, i wouldn't be as critical under those circumstances.
I think many also understand a championship cannot be built in one or two seasons, especially with a young QB. Yes, Rick has been here for longer than two seasons, but I'm referring to the Rick-Zimmer combo.


I understand that a championship can't be built in one or two seasons too and please note, I have never stated that I expected otherwise. However, as I've also said, I think the Vikings are more than 2 years into a rebuilding program. In my opinion, they are clearly 4-5 years in but I realize that inserting a coaching change into the midst of that process constitutes a "reset" of sorts and in the minds of many fans, a complete re-start. It's a big, disruptive change.
It COULD be trending the other way. Easily. Maybe you're fed up and aren't as patient waiting for a coach-GM plan to come to fruition anymore and want instant Super Bowl.
I AM fed up but I'm smart enough to realize the Vikes weren't in position to win an "instant Super Bowl". My frustration isn't so simplistic. :) I have the patience to wait for a coach-GM plan to come to fruition but I want to see the Vikings show that patience and I want to see a plan that instills confidence. Since the team gave up on their last coach after just 3 years (and basically after 2 since it was clear he would have to make the playoffs just to keep his job) and since the Wilfs are now on their 4th coach since acquiring the team in 2005, I'm not convinced they have enough patience.

As you know, I think there's been a tendency to settle. I don't believe this team has been as smart or aggressive about building/rebuilding as necessary and that's why I don't share the level of confidence some of you have in the team right now. My doubts have been been reinforced by Bridgewater's lack of progress last year, the offense's predictable, conservative approach and overall lack of production and even the team's struggles to beat high-quality opponents.
As long of a fan as you've been it's hard to blame you. I just think the majority here have more patience with so many new pieces in place when building a championship squad. Nobody is right or wrong.
I can't help wondering if my criticisms of the Vikings are perceived more harshly than they're intended because they're unwelcome amidst the enthusiasm for Zimmer's team and because I always end up having to defend them. The repetition that entails probably makes it sound like I'm just railing against them.

My main concerns are with Spielman and ownership, not with Zimmer. I'm a little concerned that he could be one of those defensive coaches who never fields a very good offense but it's too soon to tell if that's the case. Where the long experience as a fan comes in is really just that this is familiar territory and to my eyes, this team hasn't put itself on a trajectory that distinguishes them from past Vikings teams. I AM hopeful but I'm not confident and please understand, this is about confidence for me, not patience.
Pondering Her Percy
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9241
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
Location: Watertown, NY
x 1118

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Pondering Her Percy »

dead_poet wrote:
I'm thinking this is because he wasnt guaranteed a starting spot. Maybe he has a better shot starting in Arizona because DJ Humphries wasnt the best draft pick. I hope he comes here because it provides solid depth
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by mondry »

jackal wrote: Boone is a great OL .. I'm hoping having a rock solid LG next to him Kalil returns to
rookie form.
People talk about that helping Kalil, I'm worried about the opposite effect, every LG we put next to him has struggled and had their worst career seasons, hopefully Boone breaks the streak.
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by halfgiz »

Kalil is probably going to have a great year this year. It's his contract year. :thumbsup:

Jim I think with the offensive coach hirings this off season Zimmer is trying to take us to the next step. How many teams do you know that actually have 4 head coaches?

To me though it is a little concerning that it seems we have been having trouble enticing players to sign.
We are an up and coming team with a brand new stadium. This year it seems instead of getting prime players we have been getting table scraps and hoping they resurrect their careers.
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Posts: 2992
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Jordysghost »

halfgiz wrote:Kalil is probably going to have a great year this year. It's his contract year. :thumbsup:

Jim I think with the offensive coach hirings this off season Zimmer is trying to take us to the next step. How many teams do you know that actually have 4 head coaches?

To me though it is a little concerning that it seems we have been having trouble enticing players to sign.
We are an up and coming team with a brand new stadium. This year it seems instead of getting prime players we have been getting table scraps and hoping they resurrect their careers.
The Vikings salary cap doesn't need more 'prime' (Expensive) players right now. Not from free agency.

Also, idk if I even agree with that sentiment regardless, its not far into free agency, I don't think we are at the 'table scraps' part yet.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by fiestavike »

halfgiz wrote:Kalil is probably going to have a great year this year. It's his contract year. :thumbsup:

Jim I think with the offensive coach hirings this off season Zimmer is trying to take us to the next step. How many teams do you know that actually have 4 head coaches?

To me though it is a little concerning that it seems we have been having trouble enticing players to sign.
We are an up and coming team with a brand new stadium. This year it seems instead of getting prime players we have been getting table scraps and hoping they resurrect their careers.
There's nothing wrong with filling some needs with 1 year contracts. Its better than trying to fill them through the draft.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Posts: 2992
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by Jordysghost »

fiestavike wrote: There's nothing wrong with filling some needs with 1 year contracts. Its better than trying to fill them through the draft.
While I think I know the way you mean that, I don't think anything is better then filling a need via draft.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by fiestavike »

Jordysghost wrote: While I think I know the way you mean that, I don't think anything is better then filling a need via draft.
What I mean is, you want to build through the draft, but its nice to go into the draft without a desperate need. You don't want to go reach for a safety out of desperation, its better to sign Griffen or Nelson for one year and then if a S is BPA draft him.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by jackal »

picking up two more guys who might be, three down backers in addition to Barr and Kendricks and
a few other questionable 3 down backers like Audie Cole. I am wondering if we will run a version
of the 4D6 Bears defense at times. I know Zimmer likes to blitz the gaps, with Barr and Kendricks.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: 2016 Vikings Free Agency Thread (News, Rumors, Transacti

Post by fiestavike »

jackal wrote:picking up two more guys who might be, three down backers in addition to Barr and Kendricks and
a few other questionable 3 down backers like Audie Cole. I am wondering if we will run a version
of the 4D6 Bears defense at times. I know Zimmer likes to blitz the gaps, with Barr and Kendricks.
Or Lamur could allow Barr to move to DE on pass rush situations. Or Kendricks and the guy from Det could allow Lamur and Barr to move to DE and Griffin and Hunter to move to DT on pass rush downs. Who knows, I just think Zimmer likes to have a lot of flexibility. It would have been fun to see what a guy like Mark Barron might have been used as under Zimmer.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Post Reply