Page 31 of 31
Re: Bears @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 15
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:13 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Skoltastic_Voyage wrote:...And yet a few posts under this one is a Packers fan who has literally goaded Vikings fans with jabs... What he says is a valid point, there has been multiple times Vikings have played better without AD. Whatever... Maybe I am done here too if that's the kinda thing you get banned for.
If you really can't see the difference, then you are right... maybe you should be done here.
Re: Bears @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 15
Posted: Sun Dec 20, 2015 9:46 pm
by John_Viveiros
S197 wrote:
When you draw attention to yourself like this it makes me want to check your profile. And when I check your profile, guess what I find? 3 warnings.
Your time on VMB is now done.
I agree that TeddyBaller was being obnoxious and deserved the banning. But this is a case where we should maybe kill the messenger and not the message. I don't think it's true, but part of me thinks there may be a bit of the "Ewing Effect" going on when we force-feed Adrian (or had the Moss ratio, or whatever we called it). The offense looks a lot snappier when we aren't running Peterson - not saying it's better, but it is more pleasing to the eye, IMHO.
If you don't know what the Ewing Effect is... read! Google is your friend.
Re: Bears @ Vikings Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 15
Posted: Mon Dec 21, 2015 3:56 am
by S197
Skoltastic_Voyage wrote:
...And yet a few posts under this one is a Packers fan who has literally goaded Vikings fans with jabs... What he says is a valid point, there has been multiple times Vikings have played better without AD. Whatever... Maybe I am done here too if that's the kinda thing you get banned for.
He was not banned for that post, he was banned because he already had 3 warnings from other incidents. He should have already been banned but it slipped through the cracks.