Moderator: Moderators
Skoltastic_Voyage wrote:...And yet a few posts under this one is a Packers fan who has literally goaded Vikings fans with jabs... What he says is a valid point, there has been multiple times Vikings have played better without AD. Whatever... Maybe I am done here too if that's the kinda thing you get banned for.
I agree that TeddyBaller was being obnoxious and deserved the banning. But this is a case where we should maybe kill the messenger and not the message. I don't think it's true, but part of me thinks there may be a bit of the "Ewing Effect" going on when we force-feed Adrian (or had the Moss ratio, or whatever we called it). The offense looks a lot snappier when we aren't running Peterson - not saying it's better, but it is more pleasing to the eye, IMHO.S197 wrote: When you draw attention to yourself like this it makes me want to check your profile. And when I check your profile, guess what I find? 3 warnings.
Your time on VMB is now done.
He was not banned for that post, he was banned because he already had 3 warnings from other incidents. He should have already been banned but it slipped through the cracks.Skoltastic_Voyage wrote: ...And yet a few posts under this one is a Packers fan who has literally goaded Vikings fans with jabs... What he says is a valid point, there has been multiple times Vikings have played better without AD. Whatever... Maybe I am done here too if that's the kinda thing you get banned for.