Page 17 of 29

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:20 am
by Jordysghost
S197 wrote:Tweet from NFL referee Jim Daopoulos
And Carey said it was a good call, what does it matter?

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:21 am
by me4get
TSonn wrote:Good chat! When I'm not on my tablet I will post a picture of the defender not grabbing the facemask. It will be neat to hear your response.
He hit the facemask, but no grab and no pull, no penalty. GB got another one of the NFL favored teams BS call.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:21 am
by PurpleKoolaid
Funkytown wrote: Yep. More of this stuff needs to be reviewable. Too many games being affected by bad officiating near the end.
But the Packer had the failedmary, just ask Jordy the Troll. Oh the humanity! Please dude gtfo, just leave. Your wrong, once again.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:23 am
by Jordysghost
PurpleKoolaid wrote: But the Packer had the failedmary, just ask Jordy the Troll. Oh the humanity! Please dude gtfo, just leave. Your wrong, once again.
Hell the Fail Mary was a million times more egregious than this even if you guys were correct, lol. Just relax man, im not trying to troll you, ill try to come off as less antagonistic from now on.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:24 am
by saint33
Jordysghost wrote: And Carey said it was a good call, what does it matter?
FTR Carey never said it was a good call, he said "he hits the facemask and the head went down, that gets called every time"

In real time it looked like a facemask, slowed down it clearly wasn't. I'm not going to blame the ref on that play especially from where he was standing, but when you watched the replay, there was no grab or pulling of the facemask.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:24 am
by Jordysghost
me4get wrote: He hit the facemask, but no grab and no pull, no penalty. GB got another one of the NFL favored teams BS call.
Can I politely inquire to your opinion on the Abbredaris PI no call? Did you think it was a good no call?

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:25 am
by TSonn
Pretty clear screen shot: http://imgur.com/XPVzq3O

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:25 am
by Craws84
Jordysghost wrote: It looked to me like his finger caused the turn to the left, im not saying it was egregious, I never was. I thought it was going to be called when I saw it, just as the uncalled PI on the Lions the play prior.
That's what is frustrating, Rogers lobs it up and majority of the time if there is any contact PI is called. Defenses have to be able to go for the ball too. Im starting to think its a play in your playbook. Rogers lob it up, Adams run under it and hit the defender. Then Rogers throw your arms in the air and beg for a penalty, bam 1st down. GB pry wondering when teams r gonna start stealing their play haha

Sent from my XT1080 using Tapatalk

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:26 am
by S197
Jordysghost wrote: And Carey said it was a good call, what does it matter?
Wait a day or so and see what people say. Like I said, in real time I totally understand the flag, it looked like a facemask to me. But the benefit of replay shows it was the wrong call.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:27 am
by Jordysghost
TSonn wrote:Pretty clear screen shot: http://imgur.com/XPVzq3O
I think in situations like this a full replay is nessecary.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:30 am
by S197
TSonn wrote:Pretty clear screen shot: http://imgur.com/XPVzq3O
And the rule to go with it, incidental contact is NOT a penalty

http://m.imgur.com/8cjhorT

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:31 am
by saint33
also "nobodies complaining about it except on this board"

two articles on PFT already, one which it is referred to as questionable, the other is an article specifically about whether the call was right or not.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:32 am
by Funkytown
PurpleMustReign wrote: Or you can admit it was the right call, which it was. I don't understand how people can argue it.
Because we know football? And we've watched a lot of it and know how calls should/shouldn't go? That should NOT have been called, unless they were sure. They weren't. And for the rest of your anti-Facebook rants, if Bridge would have gotten the call, I bet most of us would have appreciated it and felt lucky, but probably wouldn't be saying it was necessarily the right call. Big difference. I'm at work with a Packers fan right now who says it shouldn't have been called. Because it shouldn't have been. Not surprised it was, though. Gotta protect the "elite QBs".

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:33 am
by Jordysghost
Funkytown wrote: Because we know football? And we've watched a lot of it and know how calls should/shouldn't go? That should NOT have been called, unless they were sure. They weren't. And for the rest of your anti-Facebook rants, if Bridge would have gotten the call, I bet most of us would have appreciated it and felt lucky, but probably wouldn't be saying it was necessarily the right call. Big difference. I'm at work with a Packers fan right now who says it shouldn't have been called. Because it shouldn't have been. Not surprised it was, though. Gotta protect the "elite QBs".
I have seen Rodgers get facemasked and late hit with no calls plenty before so whatever.

It WAS the right call, there wasn't much of a hook but his thumb pulled the facemask to the left, a pull is a pull.

Re: Lions-Packers TNF

Posted: Fri Dec 04, 2015 12:34 am
by Jordysghost
saint33 wrote:also "nobodies complaining about it except on this board"

two articles on PFT already, one which it is referred to as questionable, the other is an article specifically about whether the call was right or not.
PFT lolol.