Page 2 of 9
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:32 pm
by Mothman
Texas Vike wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:21 pm
Moth: So good to see you post here. I rarely come around any more. Love reading your takes.
Thanks. I don't get here very often anymore either but it's still fun to pop in and talk football! I hope you're doing well.
Today was quintessential Vikings. Taking points off the board due to a very questionable call that wasn't even made ON THE FIELD? To whom else could that happen but the Vikings?

It did feel like a "peak Vikings" moment.
I love that our team rallied and managed to come back today. Totally agree, Jim, that it is absurd that Diggs gets penalized for removing his helmet but the entire Packer D can choreograph celebrations like 12 year old girls at summer camp for making a stop. Diggs let his emotions get the better of him, IMO, he was hot from that previous call that took his TD away.
I think so too. Plus, he got called for offensive PI himself near the end of the first half.
Cousins. What can we say? I don't think anyone here feels confident in his ability to win us the Lombardi. He can't handle the pressure.
In the pre-game one of Fox's commentators (Aikman? Howie Long?) said that what made Rodgers so good was his intelligence. Kirk has the physical ability to make all the throws, it's his mind / intelligence/ judgement / emotional makeup that is lacking.
He seems prone to making the big mistake at the wrong time and that can be a game-killer.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:43 pm
by CharVike
Cliff wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:06 pm
This kind if game is why I'm down on Cousins. Was it his fault the Vikings went down by 21? No.
Was he able to bring them back when the defense gave him chance after chance? No.
QBs have bad games like all players. They couldn't stop our ground game. Why even throw the ball. This new OC we have is the guy I'm down on. Pound them into the ground. Keep Rodgers on the bench and give the D some time off. Is it that hard to figure out. And then throw on 1st and goal when your QB is off and they can't stop the running game. This OC is as dumb as I ever seen. This is a one and done guy.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:49 pm
by me4get
me4get wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:16 pm
As an aside, how ridiculous is it that a player taking his helmet off outside the end zone after scoring a TD is a penalty but it's perfectly legal for an entire defensive unit to run down to the end zone and pose for a photo after a big play? The latter is easily as "unsportsmanlike" as the former.
I thought only after TDs you were allowed to have group celebrations on the field.
I looked it up, celebrations are allow after big plays if they don't delay the game. the 60+ yds the pack ran to get to the endzone sure seems be delaying the game.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:52 pm
by Bowhunting Viking
As I've told on here before Cousins starting center when he was with the Skins is from my town, am friends of the family and work with his older brother. He retired Cousins last season with the Skins and has moved back here. When we signed Cousins I was pretty excited and asked what he thought. He said... and unfortunately I PAINFULLY vividly remember it now.. he told me " Kirk's a great guy. Hes a great leader and the guys love him. He has all the talent, but he will make mistakes that will break your heart when you need it most". I hoped that would change.
Well it hasn't. He was totally right so far. Cant get much better info than from the guy who snapped him the ball every play and called out the line assignments and adjustments.
I just wish he wouldn't have included the Break your Heart crap dammit!!!
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:53 pm
by Purple Reign
Mothman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:29 pm
Honestly, it's not hindsight. I was annoyed by the decision in the moment, before a single down was played, because I didn't think it was a smart move on the road in GB's home opener.
I realize deferring has become very common (it's the choice about 90% of the time) but teams don't
always do it and I think "everybody does it" is a poor excuse for anything. A coach should still consider the wisdom of that choice. It can make a difference.
Every team wants the ball on offense to start the 2nd half, that is why they defer. I'm sure it is more than 90%, probably closer to 98%. About the only time a team will take the ball on the coin flip is if it is in overtime.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:58 pm
by Purple Reign
me4get wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:49 pm
me4get wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:16 pm
As an aside, how ridiculous is it that a player taking his helmet off outside the end zone after scoring a TD is a penalty but it's perfectly legal for an entire defensive unit to run down to the end zone and pose for a photo after a big play? The latter is easily as "unsportsmanlike" as the former.
I thought only after TDs you were allowed to have group celebrations on the field.
I looked it up, celebrations are allow after big plays if they don't delay the game. the 60+ yds the pack ran to get to the endzone sure seems be delaying the game.
I don't like the group celebrations either (especially the choreographed ones). But as far as delaying the game, they always have a tv timeout after a turnover (as they have to review every turnover anyway), so from that perspective they really aren't delaying the game.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:05 pm
by Mothman
Purple Reign wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:53 pmEvery team wants the ball on offense to start the 2nd half, that is why they defer. I'm sure it is more than 90%, probably closer to 98%. About the only time a team will take the ball on the coin flip is if it is in overtime.
I understand WHY they defer and I don't really care about the exact percentage. Even if it's 99.9%, I stand by what I said: "everybody does it" is a poor excuse for any decision. A coach should actually
think about a choice like that because it has consequences. Settling with a default choice just because it's conventional wisdom doesn't cut it for me. Consider the setting. Consider the opponent, the weather conditions, etc.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:34 pm
by VikeFanInEagleLand
CharVike wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:43 pm
Cliff wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:06 pm
This kind if game is why I'm down on Cousins. Was it his fault the Vikings went down by 21? No.
Was he able to bring them back when the defense gave him chance after chance? No.
QBs have bad games like all players. They couldn't stop our ground game. Why even throw the ball. This new OC we have is the guy I'm down on. Pound them into the ground. Keep Rodgers on the bench and give the D some time off. Is it that hard to figure out. And then throw on 1st and goal when your QB is off and they can't stop the running game. This OC is as dumb as I ever seen. This is a one and done guy.
It looks like am in the minority here but I don't think the pass play call was a bad call because you have the defense a little "run aggressive". It's first down and if you've decided that you're going for it on 4th down, the it's ok to look for a wide open receiver in the end zone on first down BUT the QB MUST throw it away if it's not a wide open play.
I can excuse Cousins for having an off play throwing....it happens. (though it seems to be becoming a trend for Cousins in anything that even resembles a big game) What I can't excuse is his decision to not throw the ball away on that play. Coming out of this game, that play and the Offensive PI on Cooke (?????) are the two plays I can't get out of my mind. The refs called 3 Offensive PI calls on the Vikes today, The one's on Cooke and Theiland were complete crap, and the one on Diggs might have technically been PI but you see it on almost every contested pass play.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:05 pm
by StumpHunter
VikeFanInEagleLand wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:34 pm
CharVike wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:43 pm
QBs have bad games like all players. They couldn't stop our ground game. Why even throw the ball. This new OC we have is the guy I'm down on. Pound them into the ground. Keep Rodgers on the bench and give the D some time off. Is it that hard to figure out. And then throw on 1st and goal when your QB is off and they can't stop the running game. This OC is as dumb as I ever seen. This is a one and done guy.
It looks like am in the minority here but I don't think the pass play call was a bad call because you have the defense a little "run aggressive". It's first down and if you've decided that you're going for it on 4th down, the it's ok to look for a wide open receiver in the end zone on first down BUT the QB MUST throw it away if it's not a wide open play.
I can excuse Cousins for having an off play throwing....it happens. (though it seems to be becoming a trend for Cousins in anything that even resembles a big game) What I can't excuse is his decision to not throw the ball away on that play. Coming out of this game, that play and the Offensive PI on Cooke (?????) are the two plays I can't get out of my mind. The refs called 3 Offensive PI calls on the Vikes today, The one's on Cooke and Theiland were complete crap, and the one on Diggs might have technically been PI but you see it on almost every contested pass play.
Of course it wasn't a bad call...unless you have a bad QB. Today we had a bad QB.
This is not high school football. you have to be able to call a pass play occasionally to keep defenses honest.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:16 pm
by CharVike
VikeFanInEagleLand wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:34 pm
CharVike wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:43 pm
QBs have bad games like all players. They couldn't stop our ground game. Why even throw the ball. This new OC we have is the guy I'm down on. Pound them into the ground. Keep Rodgers on the bench and give the D some time off. Is it that hard to figure out. And then throw on 1st and goal when your QB is off and they can't stop the running game. This OC is as dumb as I ever seen. This is a one and done guy.
It looks like am in the minority here but I don't think the pass play call was a bad call because you have the defense a little "run aggressive". It's first down and if you've decided that you're going for it on 4th down, the it's ok to look for a wide open receiver in the end zone on first down BUT the QB MUST throw it away if it's not a wide open play.
I can excuse Cousins for having an off play throwing....it happens. (though it seems to be becoming a trend for Cousins in anything that even resembles a big game) What I can't excuse is his decision to not throw the ball away on that play. Coming out of this game, that play and the Offensive PI on Cooke (?????) are the two plays I can't get out of my mind. The refs called 3 Offensive PI calls on the Vikes today, The one's on Cooke and Theiland were complete crap, and the one on Diggs might have technically been PI but you see it on almost every contested pass play.
Another thing with throwing if it's incomplete the clock stops. The run might have been stuffed also but at least the clock is running. Plus Cook was playing lights out. He was red hot. Much hotter than Cousins. But looking backwards is easy. I said on other posts some bad things can happen when you throw. Imagine a strip sack as an example. Cousins is known to fumble. Or just a regular sack after the drop back. The loss of yardage. Now your screwed.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:35 pm
by Purple Reign
Mothman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:05 pm
Purple Reign wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:53 pmEvery team wants the ball on offense to start the 2nd half, that is why they defer. I'm sure it is more than 90%, probably closer to 98%. About the only time a team will take the ball on the coin flip is if it is in overtime.
I understand WHY they defer and I don't really care about the exact percentage. Even if it's 99.9%, I stand by what I said: "everybody does it" is a poor excuse for any decision. A coach should actually
think about a choice like that because it has consequences. Settling with a default choice just because it's conventional wisdom doesn't cut it for me. Consider the setting. Consider the opponent, the weather conditions, etc.
So what makes you think taking the ball would have been a better choice? The Packer's offense looked horrible last week plus the fact that the Viking defense was outstanding and the weather was a non factor. Just because it was their home opener isn't enough of a reason to go against conventional wisdom to defer. I have no problem with the Vikings decision to defer. As I said, most team prefer to start the 2nd half with the ball.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:47 pm
by VikingPaul73
Refs refs refs blah blah blah
Zimmer and cousins lost this game, not the refs
Deal with it.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:52 pm
by YikesVikes
The choice to pass wasn't the best but the location of the pass was the issue. He missed the TE opening. The issue was he threw late and short. I'm now convinced he is not the guy.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:13 pm
by CharVike
StumpHunter wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:05 pm
VikeFanInEagleLand wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:34 pm
It looks like am in the minority here but I don't think the pass play call was a bad call because you have the defense a little "run aggressive". It's first down and if you've decided that you're going for it on 4th down, the it's ok to look for a wide open receiver in the end zone on first down BUT the QB MUST throw it away if it's not a wide open play.
I can excuse Cousins for having an off play throwing....it happens. (though it seems to be becoming a trend for Cousins in anything that even resembles a big game) What I can't excuse is his decision to not throw the ball away on that play. Coming out of this game, that play and the Offensive PI on Cooke (?????) are the two plays I can't get out of my mind. The refs called 3 Offensive PI calls on the Vikes today, The one's on Cooke and Theiland were complete crap, and the one on Diggs might have technically been PI but you see it on almost every contested pass play.
Of course it wasn't a bad call...unless you have a bad QB. Today we had a bad QB.
This is not high school football. you have to be able to call a pass play occasionally to keep defenses honest.
Here is another piece. Incomplete pass stops the clock. Don't stop the clock in that situation. A sack can lead to a big loss of yardage or a strip. Our hot hand was Cook. The guy was playing great. Don't take it out of his hands. Let him finish the job. Looking back is easy. If we score it's a great call. But there was still time left on the clock and a FG beats you. The end game is Cousins should have thrown it away.
Re: Vikings/Packers post-game thread
Posted: Sun Sep 15, 2019 7:16 pm
by Mothman
Purple Reign wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 6:35 pm
Mothman wrote: ↑Sun Sep 15, 2019 5:05 pm
I understand WHY they defer and I don't really care about the exact percentage. Even if it's 99.9%, I stand by what I said: "everybody does it" is a poor excuse for any decision. A coach should actually
think about a choice like that because it has consequences. Settling with a default choice just because it's conventional wisdom doesn't cut it for me. Consider the setting. Consider the opponent, the weather conditions, etc.
So what makes you think taking the ball would have been a better choice? The Packer's offense looked horrible last week plus the fact that the Viking defense was outstanding and the weather was a non factor. Just because it was their home opener isn't enough of a reason to go against conventional wisdom to defer. I have no problem with the Vikings decision to defer. As I said, most team prefer to start the 2nd half with the ball.
I didn't like the decision because I think under the circumstances, it makes more sense to take the ball and try to seize momentum early with a strong opening drive, thus taking the crowd out of the game and depriving the opponent's future HOF quarterback of the chance to do exactly what he did to start the game.
If you liked the choice, fine. It sure worked out great for the Vikings!