Who's better than the Vikings?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by mosscarter »

i would say many teams are better especially ones that have qb's who don't throw for under 200 yards in 7 games. until we get some semblance of an offense a championship is a long way off. we might make the playoffs the next year or two, but with this current passing attack we won't go far.
mondry
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8455
Joined: Fri Sep 28, 2007 12:53 pm

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by mondry »

Next year? I don't see anyone better than the Vikings. Like I just mentioned in the other thread if we get past Carolina I don't see any AFC team being able to compete with us in the superbowl.

Let's look at the 3 phases of the game

1. Defense - Clearly this is a top 3 unit next year, all the young talent is only going to get better and it's clear Zimmer's scheme and ability to coach it is top notch in today's NFL. Only injuries can stop them.

2. Special teams - We have the best kick returner in the NFL and a solid punt returner and I can't even remember the last time we gave up a punt or kick return TD. The coverage unit is also top notch. Our average starting field position was the 30.1 yard line while our opponents started from the 25 on average, that is one of the best for / against in the league. The punter leaves a bit to be desired but clearly he's asked to sacrifice distance for hang time and thus the good coverage. Walsh kicks a bunch of Touch backs and is a reliable long range kicker, just needs to work out the kinks on his short game and he'll be fine.

3. Offense - We were 7th in scoring efficiency, 3rd in average starting field position, and 16th in points. That basically means the defense and special teams set them up pretty well but they could move the ball as well. Clearly they kicked a lot of field goals but if they can turn a couple of them into TD's that'll bump them way up in points.

Being 7th in scoring efficiency and 16th in points tells me the opportunity is certainly there to do better, they just didn't capitalize on it enough because of the surrounding circumstances. The O-line basically forced our hand with the rest of the offense / scheme into the conservative play it safe offense we saw towards the end of the year. The best way to look at it is that scoring efficiency is your upside while total points is what you actually achieved. In other words we were in scoring position a LOT but often settled for FG's.

We all know by now that improving the O-line will be the magic elixir for this team. Rudolph was one of our best pass catching options and one of Teddy's most trusted targets but often he had to stay in to block because we had to run so much max protect. Not having to do that alone will be big for our offense but clearly better protection and not to mention run blocking will make it easier for everyone, including the run game.

It obviously doesn't look pretty but 16th in points is already dead center of the league so they don't even have to get that much better when you consider they're almost certainly going to have a top 3 defense and special teams backing them up again.

The scary thing though? They certainly have a lot of room for improvement but they managed to be dead average in points despite all the offensive line problems.
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by halfgiz »

Injuries is going to be a big factor in that question. What would the panthers have been with Newton injured or the Packers with Rodgers injured?
Look how injuries hampered our OL this year.
I like a lot of teams for next year.

New England, Kansas City, Seahawks, Packers, Steelers, Bengals, Panthers, Jets, Cardinals, Raiders, and the Broncos .
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by losperros »

halfgiz wrote:Injuries is going to be a big factor in that question. What would the panthers have been with Newton injured or the Packers with Rodgers injured?
Look how injuries hampered our OL this year.
I like a lot of teams for next year.

New England, Kansas City, Seahawks, Packers, Steelers, Bengals, Panthers, Jets, Cardinals, Raiders, and the Broncos .
Good point. Intangibles such as injuries play a big part for any team. It's something that cannot be predicted.
User avatar
CbusVikesFan
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by CbusVikesFan »

We need a couple of Buckeyes on the team. The Vikings have always been better with a Buckeye or two on the roster.
Vikings would improve their rankings if they drafted one more LB, a couple of guards, a WR, and a safety. It's a wrap.
There are many teams right now that are better than the Vikings. NE, Pitt, Den, AZ, Panthers, Bengals, and maybe GB.
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter
Boon
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:28 pm
x 32

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by Boon »

I like how teams should have tape on zimmers defense lol, guys been in the league for over 20 years, im pretty sure they have enough tape on his schemes by now.

As long as he has the defense playing like animals this team is a contender, I could care less who the qb is.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by Demi »

I like how teams should have tape on zimmers defense lol, guys been in the league for over 20 years, im pretty sure they have enough tape on his schemes by now.
I'm pretty sure he's not running the same schemes now he was running 20 years ago. Much less with the same personnel. Much less with the specific players and how they perform in whatever scheme he's running. It's not just watching to see how he calls it's defense. It's watching tape on how each individual player plays in this defense. In certain situations. Against certain blocking, or routes.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1513
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
x 90

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by chicagopurple »

remember, we will be playing indoor next year.....better for AP, better for Teddy, and better for our kickers. and LOUDER once again!
User avatar
halfgiz
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 11:38 pm
x 117

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by halfgiz »

This is from USA Today...interesting power rankings 2-9

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/rankings/
IrishViking
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1631
Joined: Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:02 am

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by IrishViking »

halfgiz wrote:This is from USA Today...interesting power rankings 2-9

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/nfl/rankings/

I kinda think for now they just sorta plug them in where they finished the playoffs at at move from there.
Jordysghost
Packers Suck
Posts: 2992
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by Jordysghost »

chicagopurple wrote: THeir window for success is closing. Green Bay has some serious rebuilding to do.
Based on what? they had a top 12 O and D coupled with a HOF QB, a top 5 youngest roster, and one of the leagues best cap situation.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by jackal »

Based on what? they had a top 12 O and D coupled with a HOF QB, a top 5 youngest roster, and one of the leagues best cap situation.


Their defense is terrible, especially in the playoffs. The refs threw GB probably two wins this year. That face mask call against Detroit

being one of them. It was obvious in the in the replay that the Detroit didn't grab Rodgers face mask, but lets break down your logic ??


One of the NFL's best cap situations? Wrong your 15'th in the league (middle of the road) right now
You couldn't afford a top NFL free agent unless you moved his cap across many seasons.

http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

GB has top five youngest roster? Well lets look at how all those young wide outs did for you through
the grind of the season?


http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/ Yeah all those drops, led you guys from being five or six
drops on the season to being worst in the league. Luckily Eagles and Giants were really bad. Our younger roster
including Teddy was like five spots better than your "TOP FIVE young team.... when it came to drops.


Reality check...Teddy had one of the best games against Denver and Arizona, on the road this season.
Rodgers had two horrible games against Denver 76 passing yards and Arizona ripped you guys a new one.
Your delusional if you think your team is going the right way. WE only lost one divisional game last season
(which happened to be against you guys) Green Bay lost every divisional home game 0-3 at home versus
NFC North teams. Rodgers was 17th in yards last season You lost by thirty points in Arizona
and Rodgers had a 64 percentage QBR. If you take away the Divisional win against Detroit in which
you should have lost(via the terrible face mask call). Carolina thumped you guys too by what 19 points.

Next season your schedule with be much harder and you lost against three of the playoff teams by
an average of twenty points last year (Carolina, Denver, and Arizona) I think you guys will be closer
to the bottom of the North than top(which is where the Vikings will be).
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by dead_poet »

jackal wrote:Based on what? they had a top 12 O and D coupled with a HOF QB, a top 5 youngest roster, and one of the leagues best cap situation.


Their defense is terrible, especially in the playoffs. The refs threw GB probably two wins this year. That face mask call against Detroit

being one of them. It was obvious in the in the replay that the Detroit didn't grab Rodgers face mask, but lets break down your logic ??


One of the NFL's best cap situations? Wrong your 15'th in the league (middle of the road) right now
You couldn't afford a top NFL free agent unless you moved his cap across many seasons.

http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/

GB has top five youngest roster? Well lets look at how all those young wide outs did for you through
the grind of the season?


http://overthecap.com/salary-cap-space/ Yeah all those drops, led you guys from being five or six
drops on the season to being worst in the league. Luckily Eagles and Giants were really bad. Our younger roster
including Teddy was like five spots better than your "TOP FIVE young team.... when it came to drops.


Reality check...Teddy had one of the best games against Denver and Arizona, on the road this season.
Rodgers had two horrible games against Denver 76 passing yards and Arizona ripped you guys a new one.
Your delusional if you think your team is going the right way. WE only lost one divisional game last season
(which happened to be against you guys) Green Bay lost every divisional home game 0-3 at home versus
NFC North teams. Rodgers was 17th in yards last season You lost by thirty points in Arizona
and Rodgers had a 64 percentage QBR. If you take away the Divisional win against Detroit in which
you should have lost(via the terrible face mask call). Carolina thumped you guys too by what 19 points.

Next season your schedule with be much harder and you lost against three of the playoff teams by
an average of twenty points last year (Carolina, Denver, and Arizona) I think you guys will be closer
to the bottom of the North than top(which is where the Vikings will be).
Ok. You're invited to Christmas.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
mike2mike
Starter
Posts: 184
Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2014 9:40 pm
x 11

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by mike2mike »

"Who's got it better than us? ...nooooobody!"
fiestavike
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4969
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
x 401

Re: Who's better than the Vikings?

Post by fiestavike »

mike2mike wrote:"Who's got it better than us? ...nooooobody!"
amen!
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
Post Reply