Page 2 of 45
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:27 am
by Mothman
Raptorman wrote:
Why? Because Teddy didn't eat toast at breakfast?
It was too much toast. Plus Teddy slathered on extra butter and jam. Bad sign.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:49 am
by purplehaze
Great.

This is sad. I though i would never have to do this again.
Ponder predictions: over/ unders
1 int (over)
1td (under)
200 yards passing. (under)
sacks 2 (over)
Lose by 10 points (over)
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:51 am
by Leafman
purplehaze wrote:Great.

This is sad. I though i would never have to do this again.
Ponder predictions: over/ unders
1 int (over)
1td (under)
200 yards passing. (under)
sacks 2 (over)
Lose by 10 points (over)
R - E - L - A - X. Relax.
Have another puff of whatever your avatar is smokin'.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:52 am
by HardcoreVikesFan
Damn. This will be the first game of the season my girlfriend will be able to watch the game with me. How unfortunate it will be if she has to watch Ponder over Bridgewater.
Anyway, I expect a heavy dose of running if Ponder has to start. Who knows? Maybe Ponder can make some good throws. I am definitely not going to root against this team just because he is starting.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 10:58 am
by purplehaze
Leafman wrote:
R - E - L - A - X. Relax.
Have another puff of whatever your avatar is smokin'.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
The most potent weed cannot neutralize the ponder nightmare. Just turns into a bad trip.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:13 am
by ThePiper
Having media saying Teddy might not play tonight could turn out to be a good thing. It forces the fudge packers to prepare for two different quarterbacks. Not that it is hard to gameplan against Ponder, I am just saying....
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:21 am
by Leafman
ThePiper wrote:Having media saying Teddy might not play tonight could turn out to be a good thing. It forces the fudge packers to prepare for two different quarterbacks. Not that it is hard to gameplan against Ponder, I am just saying....
I actually believe this is is all engineered smoke-and-mirrors from the Viking camp. I believe Teddy is playing. He gets 9 days rest after this one, and contrary to other poster's opinions, I believe a slick field is easier for him to play on because it means his footing will give way before his ankle does, which would not be the case on firm turf. Zimmer wants McCarthy & Co. to spend as much time beefing up their gameplan for run defense as possible, so he can surprise them with an aerial attack led by Teddy at the helm.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:26 am
by dead_poet
Leafman wrote:
I actually believe this is is all engineered smoke-and-mirrors from the Viking camp. I believe Teddy is playing. He gets 9 days rest after this one, and contrary to other poster's opinions, I believe a slick field is easier for him to play on because it means his footing will give way before his ankle does, which would not be the case on firm turf. Zimmer wants McCarthy & Co. to spend as much time beefing up their gameplan for run defense as possible, so he can surprise them with an aerial attack led by Teddy at the helm.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
That would be amazing, gutsy, contrarian, risky and quite the vote of confidence in the rookie. I have my doubts, but we'll find out soon!
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:28 am
by purpletinted66
I saw phil simms mentioned all the qb's are glad to work with n.turner. maybe he help ponder i don't know - i wish
sent from tapatio talk
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:30 am
by Purple bruise
dead_poet wrote:
That would be amazing, gutsy, contrarian, risky and quite the vote of confidence in the rookie. I have my doubts, but we'll find out soon!
Have they activated either of their two QBs from the practice squad.? That to me would speak volumes.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:35 am
by TSonn
Not that I'm doubting Teddy's confidence, but I wonder what's worse for a rookie QB's confidence: playing really poorly on an injured ankle on a nationally televised game OR sitting out of a nationally televised game and adding fuel to the "Teddy is soft" fire.
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:40 am
by fiestavike
Assuming Ponder starts
Ponder predictions: over/ unders
1 int (push)
1td (push)
200 yards passing. (over)
sacks 2 (over)
Lose by 10 points (under)
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:43 am
by Leafman
Purple bruise wrote: Have they activated either of their two QBs from the practice squad.? That to me would speak volumes.
Not that I'm aware of ... but the Vikings have said that Patterson and McKinnon can both step in at QB, which would probably mean a LOT of read-option.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:44 am
by Purple bruise
Leafman wrote:
Not that I'm aware of ... but the Vikings have said that Patterson and McKinnon can both step in at QB, probably be a LOT of read-option.
LEAFMAN THE PURPLE FAN
I doubt that either of them could do worse than Webb did in that Puker play-off game

Re: Vikings @ Packers Game Day Discussion Thread -- Week 5
Posted: Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:46 am
by ThePiper
Have they activated either of their two QBs from the practice squad.? That to me would speak volumes.
Agreed. MBT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
