Page 2 of 2
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:25 pm
by The Breeze
Greenway summed it up quite nicely.
That's too bad about Ballard. It would've been a great opportunity for him. Wonder what his deal is?
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Tue Aug 27, 2013 3:33 pm
by Mothman
The Breeze wrote:Greenway summed it up quite nicely.
That's too bad about Ballard. It would've been a great opportunity for him. Wonder what his deal is?
My guess is it's a family issue of some sort but who knows?
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:42 am
by Reignman
tnvikesfan wrote:When will it be our turn to do whatever WE want and win our game? When will the officiating be done in a FAIR manner, cheap shots being called when they happen to US? We have been the red-headed stepchild of the NFL long enough. If the officials won't make the calls, maybe our players can start defending their own.
Our turn is coming now that we got the new stadium ... oh wait, is the new stadium still a go? But yeah I think the league was trying to punish us for never having a state of the art stadium they could be proud of.
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:34 am
by Mothman
http://espn.go.com/blog/nfcnorth/post/_ ... lliams-hit
We'll begin to move on from the Kevin Williams-Joe Looney play after this afternoon -- the Vikings are now about as close to their next game against the Tennessee Titans as they are to last Sunday night's game in San Francisco -- but I thought it would be worthwhile to add one more item to the discussion, from Vikings players Chad Greenway and Jared Allen on the double standard they believe exists on hits like these.
Allen's comments are interesting and he definitely has a point.
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:49 am
by dead_poet
Purplemania wrote:Still, I say make it legal for everyone.
You remind me of Tosh's bit:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NyyKLqlNTCM

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 11:59 am
by TheSpackler
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 12:27 pm
by Mothman
TheSpackler wrote:
Jared Allen has room to talk?
Did you bother to read the article?
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 6:19 pm
by PurpleKoolaid
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 7:04 pm
by PurpleMustReign
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2013 8:34 pm
by Demi
Purplemania wrote:If you don't know the difference between that hit and the one put on Williams...I've got bad news for ya.
They should both be illegal...they're both dirty cheesy hits that have no place in the game.
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 10:16 am
by TheSpackler
Allen needlessly ended Lance Louis' season and likely his career with that cheap shot, which had no bearing on the play.
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 5:07 pm
by Just Me
TheSpackler wrote:Allen needlessly ended Lance Louis' season and likely his career with that cheap shot, which had no bearing on the play.
Where's the part where Allen takes out his knee? Did I miss it?

Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Thu Aug 29, 2013 6:27 pm
by DanAS
Who cares if it was "legal"? Who cares if the Tuck Rule play was called "correctly"?
Both were horrible. Period.
As others have said, common sense should rule the day, not the past decisions of pointy-headed minds.
Re: Looney's hit on KWill was Legal?
Posted: Fri Aug 30, 2013 5:52 am
by Just Me
Purplemania wrote:
I swear it's only a matter of time before players will get flagged for hitting too hard, even if the "hitting zone" was all legal

Already happened last year (IIRC). I think it was Robinson who made a tackle on a player
while the play was still live where be basically body slammed the ball carrier to the ground. It was an "aggressive tackle" but Robinson was pulling the runner over his own body while taking him down. It looked like a hard tackle, but we've all seen those fluke tackles where the ball carrier lands on a defensive player (doesn't contact the ground) and bounces up to run for additional yards or a TD. I think Robinson was just trying to make sure some part of the carrier touched the ground. Again, it was a hard tackle, but IMHO legit, and he got flagged for "Unnecessary Roughness." I wish I could remember who we were playing...