It's also rough when you look at it from the perspective that you lost your second best offensive and defensive players in areas of significant need prior to their release. It feels like losing a new Ferrari and classic 1962 Mustang Shelby GT 500 but replacing them with a slightly used 2009 Hummer and Ford F-150.PurpleMustReign wrote:Yeah, but is it that much to ask to sign ONE outside player? I'm sorry, but I am disappointed with this FA period so far. I was hoping for something.
Speilman: Build thru the draft?
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
I definitely am happy that Loadholt and Felton are re-signed. I'm glad the Vikings are signing some of their own free agents.Mothman wrote:It's not a bad move but re-signing players has actually been his priority so far. The Vikings have been very active in free agency even if it doesn't quite feel like it. They've signed Loadholt, Simpson, Henderson and Felton (and let's not forget Berger!) in the first 24 hours. Those are all returning players so I know that doesn't seem like a step forward but as of 3 PM yesterday, none of them would have been Minnesota Vikings (and most of them weren't). Losing say, Loadholt and Felton would have felt like another big step backwards.
What I'm trying to say, Jim, is that the passing game and defending against the pass are sore spots on the team and now they're worse. I realize that it's early in the free agency. Yes, there is still time. But right now I feel apprehensive about what the Vikings might do, given what they've already done to two important areas of the team.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
Didn't we cover this same topic yesterday?dead_poet wrote: And all it took was the greatest seven-game stretch by a running back in NFL history. Spielman simply cannot count on that.

You're right, he can't count on it, but do we really think he intends to count on it? He needs to add talent at WR and that need isn't even debatable. However, this is the hand Harvin and his attitude dealt the Vikings. Percs put them in this position and I'm sure Spielman intends to do what he can to improve the situation. However, I imagine he's also trying to be smart and avoid making a panic-induced move that will hurt more than help. I think paying Wallace more than Miami offered him would have been such a move, don't you? It would have given the Vikings a nice weapon at WR but ultimately, would it have been worth the price? If Spielman is reluctant to give the clearly declining and oft-injured Greg Jennings a huge contract, that's understandable too. I'm hoping between the WRs he has, the WRs remaining in free agency and the WRs available in the draft, he can put together a receiving corps that works but Harvin thew a wrench in the works that's a frustrating but unavoidable setback.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
Nice way of putting it. I couldn't agree more.dead_poet wrote: It's also rough when you look at it from the perspective that you lost your second best offensive and defensive players in areas of significant need prior to their release. It feels like losing a new Ferrari and classic 1962 Mustang Shelby GT 500 but replacing them with a slightly used 2009 Hummer and Ford F-150.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1878
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 7:35 pm
- Location: Sydney, Australia
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
Agree with every line here. Simpson could very well be a decent #3 guy and/or be good for depth. I actaully hope they get Jennings by tonight. If not, then we can almost guarantee 2 WR's by round 3, including with our first #1 pick.The Breeze wrote:I wouldn't count on it and it will probably earn me the label of fool....but I believe Simpson will have a solid season next year, if he keeps healthy.
Not suggesting that will solve the WR issue by any stretch. I just don't think he is as bad as he looked last season and I think Wright is a player. We are one guy away from having a respectable starting group IMO.... what scares me is the complete lack of depth.
Spielman brought in 3 new WRs last year. One got wrecked before the season, one played well with the snaps he got and the other underperformed and was resigned for less money.
I see nothing to suggest that Spielman will stand pat here.
* I seriously doubt they even entertain trading up with one of those two #1 picks
A successful coach needs a patient wife, loyal dog, and great quarterback - and not necessarily in that order.
-- Bud Grant
-- Bud Grant
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
We all were but again, it just started. Very few receivers have signed anywhere yet.PurpleMustReign wrote:Yeah, but is it that much to ask to sign ONE outside player? I'm sorry, but I am disappointed with this FA period so far. I was hoping for something.
I get it but in Harvin's case, what could they do? If, as reported, he was disgruntled, wanted out and intended to hold out next season if not traded, it wouldn't have helped much to keep him. He'd just be a distraction and he'd be less help to the team sitting at home during a holdout than a player they can get by using the first round pick they received for him.losperros wrote:I definitely am happy that Loadholt and Felton are re-signed. I'm glad the Vikings are signing some of their own free agents.
What I'm trying to say, Jim, is that the passing game and defending against the pass are sore spots on the team and now they're worse.
In Winfield's case, I think releasing him was questionable, if more or less understandable. Spielman is rolling the dice and might be thinking the great, almost injury-free year they got out of Antoine last season might have been the last such year he had to give. Who knows if that's right or not?
Rightly so, Craig. I'm preaching patience and trying to look at the moves from both sides but believe me, I'm apprehensive too. Harvin and Winfield were difference-makers on a Vikes team that needed more of them, not less. I see very little chance their on-field production won't be missed in 2013 (not to mention Winfield's leadership).I realize that it's early in the free agency. Yes, there is still time. But right now I feel apprehensive about what the Vikings might do, given what they've already done to two important areas of the team.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
people, are you failing to recognize our running back had one of the greatest seasons in NFL HISTORY? case closed, that is the ONLY reason we made the playoffs.
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1056
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
and for what is worth, amendola isn't worth 1 mil a year, he is pathetic.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
I don't think anybody is missing that point.mosscarter wrote:people, are you failing to recognize our running back had one of the greatest seasons in NFL HISTORY?

-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4016
- Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: So. Utah
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
headless_norseman wrote: Agree with every line here. Simpson could very well be a decent #3 guy and/or be good for depth. I actaully hope they get Jennings by tonight. If not, then we can almost guarantee 2 WR's by round 3, including with our first #1 pick.
* I seriously doubt they even entertain trading up with one of those two #1 picks
It would be nice to snag Jennings, but I'm not sure how we get Jennings without overpaying...assuming it's true that GB wants him back. Everything would point at it being a better situation for him in GB, unless it comes down to his role in the offense. If he played here I would think it'd be a much bigger role for him.
That extra first round pick is sweet. I also would like to see them make it rather than trade up or trade it. So, that would mean no Victor Cruz for me. He was an undrafted free agent too.
Wish the draft was next week.
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
If Spielman's eye for drafting young talent continues like he started last year then I'm fully confident they will find a starting caliber receiver and probably a playmaking WR in this years draft. There are plenty of guys at that position this year, which seem to be said daily, but I can name names of more than a few guys that may be slept on or will go in later rounds that have the potential to be offensive weapons for any team.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
I feel like I've been transported back to last year.
"Why aren't the Vikings signing <insert guy here!?> ... this team is going to be horrible!"
After turning this team around last season the staff has earned the benefit of the doubt in my mind.
"Why aren't the Vikings signing <insert guy here!?> ... this team is going to be horrible!"
After turning this team around last season the staff has earned the benefit of the doubt in my mind.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
... and the year before that and the year before that...Cliff wrote:I feel like I've been transported back to last year.
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?

Now that is spot onCliff wrote:I feel like I've been transported back to last year.
"Why aren't the Vikings signing <insert guy here!?> ... this team is going to be horrible!"
After turning this team around last season the staff has earned the benefit of the doubt in my mind.


This has been and will continue to be Spielman's THREE YEAR rebuild plan mainly through the draft and resigning players that are familiar and fit into the system. I am sure we Viking fans are not much different from the rest of the NFL fans but it seems as though we want immediate gratification and will not settle for less. I like the idea of having 2 first round picks and 9 others. Look back at last years draft. Kalil was a no brainer but Harrison Smith is the bomb. I would love to get more young studs through the draft and build the team that way than bring in some older high priced players that could just as easily flop as not.
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Re: Speilman: Build thru the draft?
Maybe there really was nothing the Vikings could do about Harvin. That said, I'm still not certain I completely understand how much of Harvin's complaints were ego motivated or maybe even valid. Here's what I know:Mothman wrote:I get it but in Harvin's case, what could they do? If, as reported, he was disgruntled, wanted out and intended to hold out next season if not traded, it wouldn't have helped much to keep him. He'd just be a distraction and he'd be less help to the team sitting at home during a holdout than a player they can get by using the first round pick they received for him.
In Winfield's case, I think releasing him was questionable, if more or less understandable. Spielman is rolling the dice and might be thinking the great, almost injury-free year they got out of Antoine last season might have been the last such year he had to give. Who knows if that's right or not?
1) Both Harvin and Frazier are now on public record confirming that they talked to each other every day leading up to the trade, plus they have deep respect for each other. I am taking them at their word and therefore don't believe there was much, if any, friction between them. BTW, Kevin Williams said that if Harvin and Frazier had a shouting match after a game, then it happened behind closed doors because it never happened in the locker room.
2) Harvin has said he didn't like the way the team (re: Musgrave) ran the offense, particularly the passing game. I don't fully disagree with him.
3) Harvin did make a comment that might slam Ponder in a left-handed way regarding preparation. I'm not sure what to make of that.
None of this answers anything but it takes two to tango, so I really wonder if Harvin is really solely at fault here.
I agree with you about Winfield's case but that doesn't mean I like it. Keep in mind that as a fan I've just seen my two favorite current Vikings players get dumped from the team. It's difficult to be Mr. Spock logical about it.
Yes, that's what I'm saying too. I also am concerned about how this could impact both Christian Ponder's QB growth and Leslie Frazier's standing as a HC if next season goes awry.Mothman wrote:Rightly so, Craig. I'm preaching patience and trying to look at the moves from both sides but believe me, I'm apprehensive too. Harvin and Winfield were difference-makers on a Vikes team that needed more of them, not less. I see very little chance their on-field production won't be missed in 2013 (not to mention Winfield's leadership).
Last edited by losperros on Wed Mar 13, 2013 5:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.