Winfield for Harvin?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

NextQuestion
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2249
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by NextQuestion »

I don't get "Harvin is a nightmare off the field" bit...at least he wants to win, is passionate, and hasn't been in trouble with the law since being a pro.
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.
NextQuestion
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2249
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 11:43 am
Location: Minneapolis

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by NextQuestion »

I hate when people confuse "Diva" for "Passion". Tom Brady screamed at his O.C. in a game vs the Redskins last year and it's viewed as "Tommy boy is fired up". TO, Moss, Carter, Harvin, Ocho do it and it's "bad dude complaining".
Pull yr 84 jerseys out.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Eli »

NextQuestion wrote:I hate when people confuse "Diva" for "Passion". Tom Brady screamed at his O.C. in a game vs the Redskins last year and it's viewed as "Tommy boy is fired up". TO, Moss, Carter, Harvin, Ocho do it and it's "bad dude complaining".
They're not easily confused. The difference between a passionate player and a diva is that one is a leader, while the other is a self-centered loner who wouldn't be missed by teammates if he were hit by a bus in the parking lot before a game.
Demi
Commissioner
Posts: 23785
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2004 4:24 pm
x 8

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Demi »

Eli wrote: They're not easily confused. The difference between a passionate player and a diva is that one is a leader, while the other is a self-centered loner who wouldn't be missed by teammates if he were hit by a bus in the parking lot before a game.
And it's easy to see who is who in the previous example...
Tark10
Starter
Posts: 148
Joined: Thu May 31, 2012 8:05 am

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Tark10 »

I've always admired Winfield. At 35, he still has value on this team. If he is willing to take a pay cut to a cap friendly salary. Keep him. If not..He isn't worth 7 mil a year. Harvin is a priority and is the most versatile player and second most talented player on this team. He is a young impact player who deserves to get paid. Glad they cut Jenkins.
User avatar
VikingPaul73
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3371
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2004 5:07 pm
x 141

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by VikingPaul73 »

Keep him 2 more years and have him retire a Viking!

He's still a very good slot corner (we saw what happened when he was injured week 17) and he sets a great example for the younger corners.
DanAS
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 690
Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 4:29 am
x 1

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by DanAS »

tradster wrote:Looking at cap space and salary, would you be in favor of releasing Winfield to free up money and cap space to sign Harvin?
Why is this an either/or?

Did 49ers say "Montana or Rice"? Not until they had a Young waiting in the wings. We don't have stud corners or receivers to burn.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Eli »

DanAS wrote:Why is this an either/or?
To my thinking, Harvin/Winfield isn't the most logical question to ask. A more honest question might be whether you would release Winfield and his $7.5M cap hit in favor of using that cap space on a younger cornerback capable of playing every down? If Winfield won't renegotiate, I find it hard to believe that there aren't much better options available for the that kind of money.
sdranger
Rookie
Posts: 47
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 10:34 am

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by sdranger »

My money says they're both gone next year. Although the reality of the situation with Winfield may make him restructre I just have this gut feeling that Harvin is history. I think we might be getting the 30th first round pick in return.
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

sdranger wrote:My money says they're both gone next year. Although the reality of the situation with Winfield may make him restructre I just have this gut feeling that Harvin is history. I think we might be getting the 30th first round pick in return.
Winfield may ( I hope not, hes one of my all time Vikings favorites and I pray he will retire as one, but in a few years) because he will be close to 37, but why Harvin? All he wants is more money and a QB that can throw the ball more then a yard. Maybe Musgrave will open the O up a bit and see if ponder can air it ut to PH. Cause it looks like hes the only legit WR we are going to have next year. Some of you make it sound like the end of the world when a player acts up a little cause he wants a bigger payday.
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Eli »

PurpleKoolaid wrote:why Harvin? All he wants is more money and a QB that can throw the ball more then a yard.
I can easily see the Vikings spending the money. The quarterback, on the other hand, is a completely different situation. If the Vikings stick with Ponder, reasoning that he's good enough to be a game manager and not completely ruin their running game, then Harvin will continue to be dissatisfied and will want to play elsewhere.
User avatar
Cliff
Site Admin
Posts: 9805
Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2004 5:51 pm
Location: Kentucky
x 536

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Cliff »

Eli wrote:If the Vikings stick with Ponder, reasoning that he's good enough to be a game manager and not completely ruin their running game, then Harvin will continue to be dissatisfied and will want to play elsewhere.
Then that makes Harvin a dummy.

He was having his most productive season ever with Ponder throwing him the ball.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Mothman »

Cliff wrote: Then that makes Harvin a dummy.

He was having his most productive season ever with Ponder throwing him the ball.
Exactly... and if they'd both stayed healthy, who knows what might have happened? Maybe the Vikes would have gone into Lambeau and come away with a playoff win.

Ponder's not holding Harvin back and he IS going to be the starting QB. If Harvin wants them to be more productive together, he should get into camp on time and spend as much time as possible working with Ponder this offseason so the two of them can develop more chemistry. If he wants to be paid like a #1 receiver, it behooves him to act like one and that begins with leadership and cooperation.

Jim
Eli
Hall of Famer
Posts: 7946
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:52 pm

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by Eli »

Yeah, I'm sure the two of them would have screen passed their way right into the Super Bowl.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: Winfield for Harvin?

Post by losperros »

Eli wrote:Yeah, I'm sure the two of them would have screen passed their way right into the Super Bowl.

Probably not. But I think having both Ponder and Harvin healthy with Adrian Peterson might have led to a playoff win in Lambeau.
Post Reply