Re: The Bucs Stop Here
Posted: Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:03 pm
Aside from Bailey Kicking. You cant tell me that wasn't a poorly officiated game it was just as bad as the Cowboys game, if not worse.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/
I completely agree. The Vikings have faced a lot of adversity this year and still were for the most part able to challenge some of the better teams in the league this year. They have a lot of promising young players and the future looks bright imo. Obviously they need to focus on offensive line, defense, and special teams this off-season. I also wouldn't mind them drafting a QB with actual promise to develop into a quality starter but I won't hold my breath for that one. It's really too bad Carlson didn't work out here. He has been good since leaving.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:54 pmThat was the truly heinous part of it. Absolutely unbelievable. That clock hit 1 second, and Brady spiked the ball about 2.5 seconds later. No wonder he's such a "master of the 2-minute drill."VikeFanInEagleLand wrote: ↑Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:34 pm
The thing about the terrible PI call on the hail mary...it should have never come to that. Vikings should have just run out the clock and gone into the locker room. Instead they gave it back to TB. Then the clock operator screwed us. All this to set up getting hosed by the refs.
There will be some who flame on me for this, but as others have said, I thought we did pretty well given the circumstances. This likely ended our slim playoff hopes, but I'm looking forward to next year. Every team in the league is going to be in trouble with the cap, but we've got a lot of young players on rookie deals who are getting a lot of experience and doing some nice things. Not consistently enough, but they'll get better.
Unless we can't find a kicker. Then we're screwed.
150% agree man. It was just like watching Dallas Part 2: The Sequal. No doubt that the Zebras were definitely favoring Dallas and TB. When that hit on Beebe wasn't called I thought Well here we go again. And I was spot on.
The defense didn't hold the Bucs to 20:57 as much as the offense held onto the ball that long. They had an 8:15 second drive in the 1st quarter. They had several long drives in the 1st half.VikingLord wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 1:51 pmWere they?
They held the Bucs to 20:57 TOP. Gave up 17 first downs.
It's going by the entire season. They had a pretty good second game against the Packers. I'm not sure they had a good game against any other decent competition.But I think saying they can't compete with decent teams is a bit too far, at least if we're going off of what actually happened yesterday.
When I said Zimmer doesn't have a good grasp on running an "offense first team" I meant I don't agree with the way he seems to be calling games. It feels like he's still relying too much on the defense to hold leads rather than stepping on the gas with the offense a little more. I'm sure that's just my arm-chair coaching though. Obviously I'm just some dude with an opinion.I also don't agree with your take on the offense. First, Zimmer isn't the OC - Kubiak is, and that Kubiak offense statistically ranks 7th in YPG. Now that doesn't prove they're awesome, but it's a bit of a stretch to say they're not that good.
This is especially true given the struggles of the interior OL to start the year. Yesterday there were multiple injuries along the OL during the game, forcing Samia in and someone to shift to right tackle at one point. That against what pretty much is one of, if not the, best defensive fronts overall in the league this year. It made a difference late, especially in terms of pass blocking.
Bailey missing the FGs does highlight a weakness of the team, yeah. If the offense can't get into the end-zone, which they couldn't despite moving the ball well, they'll have to rely on what can only be described as a terrible kicking game.I just don't think they were brought back to earth yesterday, unless you consider the refs making and missing lots of critical, questionable calls and Dan Bailey missing lots of field goals as the definition of that. The Bucs were very fortunate to escape with a win yesterday, and if I'm a Bucs fan, I'm cringing thinking about what that team is going to do in the playoffs.
I may have been a little hard on the defense given that game as a sample-size. I still think as a unit they're awful. I do see hope for the future but as far as this season and the rest of it. Just because there are understandable reasons whey they're awful (injuries, young players, etc.) doesn't mean they're not awful right now.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:30 amI don't know about your comments about the defense. Until the last couple minutes, when Tampa Bay was running out the clock, our undermanned defense had given up less than 300 total yards. Granted, Tampa Bay only held the ball for 21 minutes, but that's winning football. Tampa Bay, which lives on explosive plays, had just two. And I mentioned this in another post — 17 of Tampa Bay's points came after missed field goals. They're back-breakers.
Which brings us to special teams. You're right ... we take special teams for granted, but if this game proves anything, it's that special teams really are a third of the formula. Marwan Malouf has to go. This is an ongoing problem, not just with Bailey's kicks, but the impending feel of doom every time that unit takes the field. You just KNOW the team itself feels the same way. There are guys who really coach special teams well — Joe Judge, now the head coach in New York, comes to mind. I think this organization HAS to prioritize finding a great special teams coach this offseason. That's a huge area of opportunity that can be fixed with almost no salary cap implications. Well, except cutting Dan Bailey ... almost unbelievably, if we cut him before June 1, we still take a $400,000 dead cap hit for 2021.
I thought they held up pretty well against the Seahawks. Pretty much held the vaunted Russell Wilson in check for most of that game.
After being cut, Carlson took a few weeks with a private kicking coach to fix his issues, something he couldn't have done if we held onto him. He then went on to be the 24th most accurate kicker in 2018, and the 30th most accurate kicker in 2019. He is now 11th, with the Raiders, but that is 2 seasons of poor kicking you would have had to live through to get to what is so far an outlier with Carlson.Cliff wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:00 amI may have been a little hard on the defense given that game as a sample-size. I still think as a unit they're awful. I do see hope for the future but as far as this season and the rest of it. Just because there are understandable reasons whey they're awful (injuries, young players, etc.) doesn't mean they're not awful right now.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:30 amI don't know about your comments about the defense. Until the last couple minutes, when Tampa Bay was running out the clock, our undermanned defense had given up less than 300 total yards. Granted, Tampa Bay only held the ball for 21 minutes, but that's winning football. Tampa Bay, which lives on explosive plays, had just two. And I mentioned this in another post — 17 of Tampa Bay's points came after missed field goals. They're back-breakers.
Which brings us to special teams. You're right ... we take special teams for granted, but if this game proves anything, it's that special teams really are a third of the formula. Marwan Malouf has to go. This is an ongoing problem, not just with Bailey's kicks, but the impending feel of doom every time that unit takes the field. You just KNOW the team itself feels the same way. There are guys who really coach special teams well — Joe Judge, now the head coach in New York, comes to mind. I think this organization HAS to prioritize finding a great special teams coach this offseason. That's a huge area of opportunity that can be fixed with almost no salary cap implications. Well, except cutting Dan Bailey ... almost unbelievably, if we cut him before June 1, we still take a $400,000 dead cap hit for 2021.
Letting go of Daniel Carlson was a huge mistake. It was a knee-jerk reaction that cost the team likely at least a decade with a stable kicker.
Yup, this is why I do not like Zimmer, he makes stupid decisions that backfire like this one and he should be fired for itCliff wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:00 amI may have been a little hard on the defense given that game as a sample-size. I still think as a unit they're awful. I do see hope for the future but as far as this season and the rest of it. Just because there are understandable reasons whey they're awful (injuries, young players, etc.) doesn't mean they're not awful right now.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Mon Dec 14, 2020 10:30 amI don't know about your comments about the defense. Until the last couple minutes, when Tampa Bay was running out the clock, our undermanned defense had given up less than 300 total yards. Granted, Tampa Bay only held the ball for 21 minutes, but that's winning football. Tampa Bay, which lives on explosive plays, had just two. And I mentioned this in another post — 17 of Tampa Bay's points came after missed field goals. They're back-breakers.
Which brings us to special teams. You're right ... we take special teams for granted, but if this game proves anything, it's that special teams really are a third of the formula. Marwan Malouf has to go. This is an ongoing problem, not just with Bailey's kicks, but the impending feel of doom every time that unit takes the field. You just KNOW the team itself feels the same way. There are guys who really coach special teams well — Joe Judge, now the head coach in New York, comes to mind. I think this organization HAS to prioritize finding a great special teams coach this offseason. That's a huge area of opportunity that can be fixed with almost no salary cap implications. Well, except cutting Dan Bailey ... almost unbelievably, if we cut him before June 1, we still take a $400,000 dead cap hit for 2021.
Letting go of Daniel Carlson was a huge mistake. It was a knee-jerk reaction that cost the team likely at least a decade with a stable kicker.
Well, he is doing well with the Raiders now making all field goals except missing 2 so farStumpHunter wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:05 amAfter being cut, Carlson took a few weeks with a private kicking coach to fix his issues, something he couldn't have done if we held onto him. He then went on to be the 24th most accurate kicker in 2018, and the 30th most accurate kicker in 2019. He is now 11th, with the Raiders, but that is 2 seasons of poor kicking you would have had to live through to get to what is so far an outlier with Carlson.Cliff wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 10:00 am
I may have been a little hard on the defense given that game as a sample-size. I still think as a unit they're awful. I do see hope for the future but as far as this season and the rest of it. Just because there are understandable reasons whey they're awful (injuries, young players, etc.) doesn't mean they're not awful right now.
Letting go of Daniel Carlson was a huge mistake. It was a knee-jerk reaction that cost the team likely at least a decade with a stable kicker.
Maybe if we could have stashed Carlson away on the practice squad to develop him it would have worked out, but it isn't like he immediately turned into a great kicker after leaving the Vikings.
The fact that the Vikings staff couldn't provide the same level of coaching as a private kicking coach provided in a handful of sessions isn't a feather in Zimmer's cap.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:05 amAfter being cut, Carlson took a few weeks with a private kicking coach to fix his issues, something he couldn't have done if we held onto him. He then went on to be the 24th most accurate kicker in 2018, and the 30th most accurate kicker in 2019. He is now 11th, with the Raiders, but that is 2 seasons of poor kicking you would have had to live through to get to what is so far an outlier with Carlson.
Maybe if we could have stashed Carlson away on the practice squad to develop him it would have worked out, but it isn't like he immediately turned into a great kicker after leaving the Vikings.
Well, if this isn't a case of glass-half-empty, nothing is. Please don't take that as a put-down ... it's your right to view the Vikings' situation that way. I and a few others just don't share it. You seem to be going mostly with the eye test, which again is your prerogative. But the eyes can deceive. Just as you believe some of us overrate young players based on our biases, I would submit that you may be underrating others based on yours.S197 wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 2:21 pm Some of the "adversity" the Vikings are having to endure is self-inflicted. When your resources are capped, in this case by dollars, you're going to have to make tough decisions if you choose to allocate large portions of your resources to a select number of individuals. This is a driving factor as to why the Vikings have to field a rookie secondary, why guys like Dozier is starting and Samia is a backup, Holmes is our DE and why Cleveland is playing guard (I assume they drafted him to play tackle). And there will be even more tough decisions to come next year and the following.
The hope of course is that some of these new guys really step up because the team is more or less all-in on that. The only way this really works is if this draft, and probably next year's, are blockbusters. I don't necessarily think we can judge the success of this year's draft by how many rookies are currently playing, there's not much of a choice, it's how well they end up playing. I would say outside of JJ, it's very much an unknown if any of these guys pan out. It would be unfair to evaluate them with less than a season under their belts but I also think it's very premature to praise this draft as a success.
2019 looked pretty good on paper but that draft is starting to sour pretty quickly. Bradbury looks a little better right now but has yet to play anywhere near close to a 1st round center. Irv Smith could be the best pick out of that draft, he'll likely fill Rudolph's shoes next year. Mattison is a committee type RB, which is ok for a 3rd round pick. The next 9 picks are guys who have basically been cut, should be cut (Samia), or are likely career backups (Boyd, Johnson, etc.).
I'll give you this ... the whole thing is very inconsistent.Cliff wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 12:43 pmThe fact that the Vikings staff couldn't provide the same level of coaching as a private kicking coach provided in a handful of sessions isn't a feather in Zimmer's cap.StumpHunter wrote: ↑Tue Dec 15, 2020 11:05 amAfter being cut, Carlson took a few weeks with a private kicking coach to fix his issues, something he couldn't have done if we held onto him. He then went on to be the 24th most accurate kicker in 2018, and the 30th most accurate kicker in 2019. He is now 11th, with the Raiders, but that is 2 seasons of poor kicking you would have had to live through to get to what is so far an outlier with Carlson.
Maybe if we could have stashed Carlson away on the practice squad to develop him it would have worked out, but it isn't like he immediately turned into a great kicker after leaving the Vikings.
2018 was his rookie year. The Vikings cut him 2 games through it. He started with the Raiders in week 8 and went on to set a team record with 94% of his field goals made with what I have to assume was fairly minor tweaking. The guy didn't completely change his kicking style in the month between being dropped by the Vikings and picked up by the Raiders.
He took a step back in 2019 no question and went to 26th in FGs made percentage. He's currently 7th in FG% made.
That said, we can call it hindsight if we want. Either way it was a mistake in the end.
My guess is that it has to do with two things: 1) Carlson was a rookie. Bailey has a long CV of kicking successfully in the NFL. I think this makes Zimmer see Bailey's current woes as an aberration that can be fixed and that he will likely return to his norm once he does. With Carlson, on the other hand, he likely thought the kid just wasn't cut out for the NFL.J. Kapp 11 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 16, 2020 10:18 am
I'll give you this ... the whole thing is very inconsistent.
Why does Zimmer cut Daniel Carlson after one bad game but keep Dan Bailey after two impossibly horrible games? Bailey has missed 7 of his last 10 kicks, including three extra points. Against Tampa Bay, he was the first kicker in 60 years to miss an extra point and 3 FGs without making a single kick. Yet the Vikings just cut their practice-squad kicker, a guy who made a 57-yarder in the 2019 preseason, and whom a lot of teams wanted to poach.
Sometimes I just want to give Mike Zimmer the old Frank Costanza to George Steinbrenner treatment (Why the hell did you trade Jay Buhner?!).