Re: WR Mike Wallace traded to Vikings
Posted: Sun Mar 15, 2015 12:17 am
Rice was awesome in 09, but even he wasn't Moss. Not even close to the same wheels.
A message board dedicated to the discussion of Minnesota Viking Football.
https://www.vikingsmessageboard.com/
BerrymanThe Breeze wrote:Indeed....it's been a rough patch.
Williamson
Berryman
Rice
Simpson
maybe one or two more?
Coupled with the cast of castaways we had to throw them the rock?.....it's been grim.
Yeah Tannehill gets a bad rap, and I Honestly don't know where it comes from.The Breeze wrote:To the guys suggesting that Tannehill is weak armed or a checkdown master: How do you explain him having over 4000yds passing with a 66+ completion percentage... and, I think, 27tds too?
----
Actually until today on this board I've read and heard nothing but good things about him as a QB on the uptick.
Williamson!The Breeze wrote:Indeed....it's been a rough patch.
Williamson
Berryman
Rice
Simpson
maybe one or two more?
Coupled with the cast of castaways we had to throw them the rock?.....it's been grim.
Absolutely, and he learned that from Cris Carter. Carter was THE master at 2 things specifically, getting that other foot down even just a toe. And knowing exactly how and when to get an interference call on any defender.The Breeze wrote:effin Randy Moss.
Another thing about that guy was his amazing footwork in the back of the endzone after catching a pass. His ability to get both feet down at full throttle was really something.
---
I can empathize with Wallace bringing up Moss memories though, just because he is a legit deep threat which we haven't really had save for 09 Rice.
--
I'll be super stoked if the kid can consistantly stretch the field and Teddy can find him when he's open. It will do so much for this offense.
I agree but I think Demitrius Underwood was a close secondPuddin'Taine wrote: Williamson!
Oh man, Lol I've never been so disappointed with a Viking. Not upset, or frustrated or even mad or agitated just straight up DISSAPOINTED.
From what I saw in the Minnesota game, Tannehill is real solid. One of my best friends is a Dolphins fan, so I paid attention to them more than I probably would have, but everything I saw made me think that Miami would be in great hands moving forward. The most compelling part about Tannehill is his progress and development. His production has steadily increased every single year and even the small things on the field he's gotten better at, slowly but surely. I think that's one of the more concrete signs for quarterbacks that you have your guy. Same can be said for Teddy except his progress was pretty rapid. He got a lot better real quickly. Last year's Vikings/Dolphins game may have foreshadowed two of the better teams of the future and dare I say, a possible SB matchup?Puddin'Taine wrote: Yeah Tannehill gets a bad rap, and I Honestly don't know where it comes from.
Even down here Dolphins fans have been especially brutal since he started. And I think a lot of it has to Do with the general Dolphins fan still in the "Yeah well, He's not Marino" mindset. Mixed with the mess that is the coaching with that team the last few years. I dunno, I've always thought it was weird. If I was any team in need of a QB I'd take Tannehill in a minute.
...................The Breeze wrote:If the guy is all about money and stats he's wrong for this team IMO. I want guys who's passion is connected to winning football games...period.
All that remains to be seen with Wallace.
Which Diva WR had the biggest game in the SB?
When was the last time a WR was MVP or carried his team to the Lombardi......was it never? Probably.
It's important to have a guy or two who can stretch the field, especially in Norv's scheme...duh, but that doesn't mean you can't get it done with a good solid team guy and quite possibly on a rookie contract.
I have some doubts about Wallace and it's going to take several games before I believe he's a good fit no matter his stats.
........................PacificNorseWest wrote: From what I saw in the Minnesota game, Tannehill is real solid. One of my best friends is a Dolphins fan, so I paid attention to them more than I probably would have, but everything I saw made me think that Miami would be in great hands moving forward. The most compelling part about Tannehill is his progress and development. His production has steadily increased every single year and even the small things on the field he's gotten better at, slowly but surely. I think that's one of the more concrete signs for quarterbacks that you have your guy. Same can be said for Teddy except his progress was pretty rapid. He got a lot better real quickly. Last year's Vikings/Dolphins game may have foreshadowed two of the better teams of the future and dare I say, a possible SB matchup?
I'm getting too far ahead of myself now. I'll pump the brakes.