Mothman wrote:
It's a given that he needs to develop into a more well-rounded player but they seemed to expect that to happen overnight and when it didn't, they benched him instead of adapting and coming up with some ways to get more production out of him. As Zimmer said, it's a two-way street. Turner appeared inflexible and unimaginative when it came to Patterson.
I would caution us all to look at this from the perspective of fans who have no idea what goes on in the locker room, the film room, or on the practice field.
We don't know the full reasons Patterson's production fell off to the point where he was benched. Maybe Norv was unimaginative and refused to use Patterson's unique talents. Or it could just as easily have been a lack of effort -- physically, mentally, or attitudinally -- on Patterson's part that we simply weren't privy to. Let's all remember -- the same complaints were being thrown around for the first 3/4 of CP's rookie season, and that was with a different coaching staff. Perhaps there's a reason or two that extend beyond a lack of imagination.
Let's think about this, as well ...
If Patterson isn't playing well enough to be an every-down player, then bringing him on the field for an imaginative play pretty much takes the surprise out of it. We saw that this year. The second CP came on the field, the other team knew something was up. CP has got to improve his overall game to the point that he can stay on the field, or he's going to be ineffective, no matter how talented he is, or how imaginative the coaching is.
I guess all I'm saying is there's likely blame to go both ways. I want CP to succeed in the worst way. He can be such an exciting player. But when a guy falls behind a Cleveland practice-squad castoff and Adam Thielen on the depth chart, he has to accept some blame.