MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Moderator: Moderators
- MichViking
- Transition Player
- Posts: 359
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 6:14 pm
- Location: Houston, TX
MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
For all the Madden gamers out there, Madden has released all the teams ratings. Its interesting to see how the folks at EA sports view our team. In my opinion we still aren't getting much respect as it seems like a lot of our players are poorly rated. The one that really sticks out to me....Mack Alexander is rated higher than Trae Waynes. The other big shaft.....Danielle Hunter is only rated a 72.
Heres the full list..
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/pla ... ating:DESC
Heres the full list..
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/pla ... ating:DESC
RIP Sean Taylor
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1117
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Wow that is pretty rough. I see they went my way on the Harris over Fusco battle
They were being generous to Locke thats for sure. Waynes and Hunter got screwed.
Kendricks should be higher as well
They were being generous to Locke thats for sure. Waynes and Hunter got screwed.
Kendricks should be higher as well
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
You think Waynes got a raw ranking? I don't think so, I haven't seen much from either him nor his production to make me agree.Pondering Her Percy wrote:Wow that is pretty rough. I see they went my way on the Harris over Fusco battle
They were being generous to Locke thats for sure. Waynes and Hunter got screwed.
Kendricks should be higher as well
Kendricks ranking is quite silly though, I agree.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1277
- Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 3:31 pm
- x 76
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Sendejo higher than Kendricks... lol only madden
“I remember my mistakes more than my success.” - Adrian Peterson
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1117
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
I would've guess more in the 75 range for WaynesJordysghost wrote: You think Waynes got a raw ranking? I don't think so, I haven't seen much from either him nor his production to make me agree.
Kendricks ranking is quite silly though, I agree.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Such BS...
Oh well, I'll still win at least 2/3rds of my online games with the Vikings like a boss.
Oh well, I'll still win at least 2/3rds of my online games with the Vikings like a boss.
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Remember when Robert Blanton was like 83 overall or something?allday1991 wrote:Sendejo higher than Kendricks... lol only madden
Haven't looked at the other teams yet, but based on years past it looks like total disrespect for the division winner.
Correction.... Blanton was 86 just last year... lol
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
You can compare them to '16 ratings
http://madden-player-ratings.pointafter.com
Aparently adrian declines by 4, Bridgewater declines, Sharrif Floyd declines, Sullivan virtually no change after taking time off and having back injury. Munnerlyn declines by 6 after playing excellent year as nickel back. McKinnon zero change despite obvious improvement. Trae Waynes declines after a young player and a good offseason and obvious improvement shown throughout the year... Keep in mind the Madden 16 rankings include the updates made throughout the year.
http://madden-player-ratings.pointafter.com
Aparently adrian declines by 4, Bridgewater declines, Sharrif Floyd declines, Sullivan virtually no change after taking time off and having back injury. Munnerlyn declines by 6 after playing excellent year as nickel back. McKinnon zero change despite obvious improvement. Trae Waynes declines after a young player and a good offseason and obvious improvement shown throughout the year... Keep in mind the Madden 16 rankings include the updates made throughout the year.
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -nfc-teams
Aparently the Packers have an 85 overall defense... Hahaha yeah right.
To rate Packers 85 and Vikings 81 they must be Packer fans.
Also, the Cowboys have a better overall rating than us.... Haha yeah, ok
The check the AFC rankings... And how many are rated better than us.
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -afc-teams
Patriots (fine), Bengals (ok), Ravens (Uhhhh what?) Steelers (no), Cheifs (LOL!), Raiders (C'mon man!)
Even the Titans have a better ranking than us... What a joke.
Texans, Chargers and Bills same ranking as us. Brutal.
I guess the "optomistic" look at this is that they think Mike Zimmer must be worth more than 5 ratings points over the average NFL coach... I mean how else do they rank a team that clearly did better than it's current ranking last year and has players that as a whole are young and should improve and improved in the offseason?
Aparently the Packers have an 85 overall defense... Hahaha yeah right.
To rate Packers 85 and Vikings 81 they must be Packer fans.
Also, the Cowboys have a better overall rating than us.... Haha yeah, ok
The check the AFC rankings... And how many are rated better than us.
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -afc-teams
Patriots (fine), Bengals (ok), Ravens (Uhhhh what?) Steelers (no), Cheifs (LOL!), Raiders (C'mon man!)
Even the Titans have a better ranking than us... What a joke.
Texans, Chargers and Bills same ranking as us. Brutal.
I guess the "optomistic" look at this is that they think Mike Zimmer must be worth more than 5 ratings points over the average NFL coach... I mean how else do they rank a team that clearly did better than it's current ranking last year and has players that as a whole are young and should improve and improved in the offseason?
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
Zimmer paid them so he could use it as a motivational tactic in the locker room.mike2mike wrote:https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -nfc-teams
Aparently the Packers have an 85 overall defense... Hahaha yeah right.
To rate Packers 85 and Vikings 81 they must be Packer fans.
Also, the Cowboys have a better overall rating than us.... Haha yeah, ok
The check the AFC rankings... And how many are rated better than us.
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -afc-teams
Patriots (fine), Bengals (ok), Ravens (Uhhhh what?) Steelers (no), Cheifs (LOL!), Raiders (C'mon man!)
Even the Titans have a better ranking than us... What a joke.
Texans, Chargers and Bills same ranking as us. Brutal.
I guess the "optomistic" look at this is that they think Mike Zimmer must be worth more than 5 ratings points over the average NFL coach... I mean how else do they rank a team that clearly did better than it's current ranking last year and has players that as a whole are young and should improve and improved in the offseason?
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: MADDEN 17 Vikings team rated.
The Packers D being 85 is pretty apt imo, they were very good last year, I agree the Vikes should have a higher ranking then 81 though.mike2mike wrote:https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -nfc-teams
Aparently the Packers have an 85 overall defense... Hahaha yeah right.
To rate Packers 85 and Vikings 81 they must be Packer fans.
Also, the Cowboys have a better overall rating than us.... Haha yeah, ok
The check the AFC rankings... And how many are rated better than us.
https://www.easports.com/madden-nfl/new ... -afc-teams
Patriots (fine), Bengals (ok), Ravens (Uhhhh what?) Steelers (no), Cheifs (LOL!), Raiders (C'mon man!)
Even the Titans have a better ranking than us... What a joke.
Texans, Chargers and Bills same ranking as us. Brutal.
I guess the "optomistic" look at this is that they think Mike Zimmer must be worth more than 5 ratings points over the average NFL coach... I mean how else do they rank a team that clearly did better than it's current ranking last year and has players that as a whole are young and should improve and improved in the offseason?
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011