Starting to think this offensive line might be gelling. I'd LOVE to see them turn the corner in their run blocking and just get Peterson rolling.Cliff wrote:Tied for 1st in the division and currently have the #1 rusher in the league.
Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
Fusco & Clemmings have been awful and were awful again on Sunday. Awfulness limited due to Turner's use of 3TE sets.fiestavike wrote: Starting to think this offensive line might be gelling. I'd LOVE to see them turn the corner in their run blocking and just get Peterson rolling.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
- x 88
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
an announcer in the game this weeks said that AP has only lead the league in Rushing for 2 seasons! This seems impossible. Is it the truth??
-
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 7:06 pm
- Location: Kathleen, GA
- x 15
- Contact:
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
Yes it is. According to Pro Football Reference he has only ended up winning the rushing title in 2008 and 2012.chicagopurple wrote:an announcer in the game this weeks said that AP has only lead the league in Rushing for 2 seasons! This seems impossible. Is it the truth??
Edit: here are the places he finished in, in each of the other years
Code: Select all
Year Place
2007 2nd
2008 1st
2009 5th
2010 6th
2011 18th (injured and missed 4 games)
2012 1st
2013 5th
2014 ---- (no data due to only playing 1 game)
- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
- x 88
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
WOW! given that most of his career he has been on a team with no real QB...ie Ponder, TJ, etc, thats pretty surprising. 2 years with Favre was the only time that justified not feeding him the ball most of the game...would have thought he piled up better numbers then that.
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
For some perspective, if AD finishes with only 500 more rushing yards this season I believe that'll place him 13th overall rushing yards in NFL history. If he follows that up with, say, 1,000 yards next season, he'll be in eighth place all-time. He needs 2,737 more career rushing yards to surpass LaDainian Tomlinson at #5, which is doable IF he can stay healthy. However he's still a long ways away from Emmitt Smith (7,408 more yards). His "lost" 2014 really does hurt his chances of ever matching Smith (though that was a monumental task even before his 2014).chicagopurple wrote:WOW! given that most of his career he has been on a team with no real QB...ie Ponder, TJ, etc, thats pretty surprising. 2 years with Favre was the only time that justified not feeding him the ball most of the game...would have thought he piled up better numbers then that.
Addendum:
Here's how many yards Peterson was short in each year he didn't win the title:
2007: 133 (played two fewer games than LaDainian Tomlinson)
2009: 623 (Chris Johnson had 44 more attempts and AD was just 33 yards behind the runner-up that year)
2010: 318 (missed a game and Arian Foster had 44 more carries)
2011: Injured/missed multiple games
2013: 341 (missed two games)
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
The Oline plays better, AD looks better. So much depends on the Oline, and ours was crap for so long (hopefully a bit better now). Clemmings has to go though. He is Charlie Johnson bad.
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
These reps could pay off in a month, a year, etc. He has moments where he is decent.PurpleKoolaid wrote:The Oline plays better, AD looks better. So much depends on the Oline, and ours was crap for so long (hopefully a bit better now). Clemmings has to go though. He is Charlie Johnson bad.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1117
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
I agree. Clemmings has been bad but I clearly remember that guys like Birk, Sully, Fusco, etc. were very bad when they first hit the field. This could be a blessing in disguise that he is starting his rookie year.fiestavike wrote: These reps could pay off in a month, a year, etc. He has moments where he is decent.
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
-
- Hall of Fame Inductee
- Posts: 4962
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:03 am
- x 398
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
especially if they can keep winning while he is learning.Pondering Her Percy wrote: I agree. Clemmings has been bad but I clearly remember that guys like Birk, Sully, Fusco, etc. were very bad when they first hit the field. This could be a blessing in disguise that he is starting his rookie year.
"You like that!"
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
-- Cap'n Spazz Cousins
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
I like the optimism! They are young guys, without a lot of experience blocking for AD, who could be 10 yards down the field before they realize the play is over.Pondering Her Percy wrote: I agree. Clemmings has been bad but I clearly remember that guys like Birk, Sully, Fusco, etc. were very bad when they first hit the field. This could be a blessing in disguise that he is starting his rookie year.
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
Packers down 10-3 with 9 min remaining.
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
People are following that one in the Around the League thread:yezzir wrote:Packers down 10-3 with 9 min remaining.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=28820
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
- Location: Hawaii
- x 151
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
No need for a tie breaker argument this week. 7-2 and in first place. A win next week would be huge.
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Re: Your 1st place Minnesota Vikings!
HUGE.808vikingsfan wrote:No need for a tie breaker argument this week. 7-2 and in first place. A win next week would be huge.
Think about this: a win next week puts the Vikes at 8-2 and drops GB to 6-4.
The 4-5 Bears host Denver. That's a difficult but arguably winnable game @ Chicago.
The following week, Chicago goes to Green Bay. Next week, a Bears win and a Packers loss would actually set up the possibility that the Bears could move into a tie for second place by beating GB.
I'm not saying it will all work out that way but that's not a scenario that even looked possible a few weeks ago. I'd love to see GB losing streak continue, especially within the division.