Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by DK Sweets »

Sorry for missing out on this last week, guys! Between moving with a baby and some other things happening in life, I was a bit overwhelmed. What a great win though!

Lets get straight into it.

Here are the enemy fan forums of the week:

Rams on Demand
http://www.ramsondemand.com/forums/rams-nfl-talk.26/

What they're saying:
Lots of history between these two great franchises....my dad still gets irritated when talking about the playoff game in 1977 when the Rams were finally supposed to beat the Vikings in the playoffs but lost...

Or our favorite, the beat down in St. Louis en route to the super bowl! :yess:

The Rams have been a bit strange this year...two great wins against the Seahawks and Cardinals. Bad loss to the Redskins. Loss at home to the Steelers, and a loss at Lambeau.....then two wins at home over inferior opponents. And the most irritated I was watching any of those games? The two wins over inferior opponents. The score looks good, but the offense only converted two or three 3rd downs in those games COMBINED - most teams do that on one drive. I think the Arizona and GB games will show you what we're all about - especially because those are probably the two best teams in the NFC. Both show you what the defense and running game can do, and then you have Foles at his best and at his worst. All other games it's kind of been something in between that.

In terms of recent memory, Rams fans are still feeling that beat down you guys put on us last week on opening day. Hopefully the players remember it as well.

Our offensive line struggles with blitzes, especially of the complex nature, so I don't see much of a passing game for us in this one - BUT, I said the exact same thing before the Arizona game. I've seen how Zimmer likes to put LBs right over the gaps and then either send them or drop them back...that's a nightmare for our offense...the Rams have to establish a passing game or soon there will be 11 guys in the box.

On defense, we've played two and a half of the best QBs in the NFL this year and still field a top 5 unit. The Vikings will have to establish the run and try to utilize a quick passing game. Problem with that will be that our secondary has played outstanding.

To me this will be pretty simple...whomever has more success running the ball will win the game. I don't feel good because it's at Minnesota and you guys seem to have our number the last few years. Wouldn't be surprised if this game ended 9-6.
I don't take any team lightly and the Vikings are 3-0 at home.
But- let's be fair, all 5 of your wins came against teams with a combined 8 wins and 23 losses.
Your' two losses are against teams with 9 wins and 6 losses. Mainly because Denver is 7-0.
You lost to SF who is terrible (agreed, we all have bad losses sometimes). You had on tough loss to Denver which is a difficult place to win for anyone.
On our side, we have 4 wins against teams that have 14 wins and 18 losses
Our 3 losses are against teams with 13 wins and 9 losses including losing to Pitt by 6 and letting Green Bay escape because Nick Foles threw 4 game killing INT's.

I don't want to sound like you're not good, I think the Vikings are decent. But outside of Denver you've played a really soft schedule. We've played some of the best offenses in the league in Pitt, Green Bay and the best defenses in the league as well. Feel free to look that up, it's 100% accurate.
We'll see what happens this weekend. But I'd guess if you played our early schedule you would be 3-4 at best.
yep. biggest game of the season

gotta get this one
Minn #3 in the league in points allowed

Rams are #5
My dad is a Vikings Fan so lemme tell you:

First, we better win next week.
Second, they're not THAT good. Blown out by the niners and beat the Chiefs, lions twice, and looked horrible today. We can beat them.
We play up to teams - our tendency has been to play down to other teams level though. That said. Vikings are not that good. Very overrated team in fact.
They needed a last second field goal to beat the Bears, which is worse than any Rams underwhelming performance this year IMO. I'd hardly call the Vikings a "really good team". They are solid. But just like our Rams, they are still in the 2nd tier of quality football clubs. A notch below the heavyweights.

I definitely think this team is up to the task. As with every other week, it will hinge on our offense. Can they perform competently? If so, our defence will give us a chance to win. Foles looked pretty sharp today and the o-line was fine. Unfortunately, we had several key drops. We'll need to fix those if we hope to come away from Minnesota with the W.

Watching Gurley v Peterson should be a treat. Both teams have solid defences with mediocre o-lines. We'll see what side can help their RB out by winning the trenches.
We owe the Vikas one from last year.
yes it is an important game, but i dont think Minnesota is as good as the Seahawks or Cardinals both of who we beat, or the Packers or Steelers both of who we had our chances to beat. very winnable game IMO.
Vikings lose
All good points. The Vikes should have lost today and to the Lions - they got lucky both times. This is another team we should stomp on and never let up for air. This could be the message game to the NFL talking heads that will predict another "Letdown game":

The Rams are for REAL.
It is going to be a low scoring and tight game. These teams are pretty much mirrors of each other in terms of how they're set up. Honestly, I don't see them winning. Until the Rams offense wakes up more, specifically the passing game and converting on 3rd down, I find it hard to see them going on the road and consistently winning games. I think the Vikings win a 13-10 type game. The difference in the game being home field advantage, a mobile qb, and a passing game that is a little more of a threat with the emergence of Diggs. I don't see Foles having a lot of time to throw in this game.
The defense and Gurley are delivering. Gurley has played like the best HB in football and the defense is executing like arguably the best defense in football. The passing offense needs to show up. Minnesota has a great defense and an excellent pass rush. Our OL needs to do their job and Foles needs to make some plays. Won't be an easy game.
Peterson the best RB the Rams will face this year and the Vikings defense is playing extremely well. More players will need to step up other than Austin & Gurley plus it's in Minnesota and it's tough to win a road game.

Defense is ready not sure the offense or offensive line is plus I'm not feeling good about Zuerlein. Defense will need to force a few turnovers in order for the good guys to win.
You know what, they have TO FEAR US. SCREW fearing them. What do we do to prolific offenses? We shut them down!...We play our game, and we win. end of story
We need to make a trade for Calvin Johnson or Alshon jeffery tomorrow then ill say we will win. We not going to beat vikes without a passing game
Are the Vikings really good? Look at their stinker against the Whiners on Monday night, then look at their wins. Barely beat the down and out Bears. Only won by six against the Chiefs and beat up on the lowly Lions twice and the Chargers don't look better. Combined all the teams they beat have won 6 games. Not exactly stellar competition. I think like the Cardinals, we haven't seen who the real Vikings are yet. We're the beginning of them leaving their cupcake schedule behind.
Two reasons I don't like the matchup:

1. Vikes front is very creative and will attack our young OL.
2. Home field will magnify reason number 1.

All that aside the Rams are good enough to go in there and get the W. The Cards game was far more scary due to their offense plus a lesser but opportunistic defense. If the Rams staff has them ready for this one I think it's a 50/50 type game.
I'm not saying we don't need to be prepared or that we won't have a fight or that our offense doesn't need to continue to improve.

The Vikings are not as good as their record. The Rams have beaten two of the top 5 defenses. The Vikings have beaten all teams in the bottom half for points allowed and yards allowed except for the Bears in yards allowed only.

The offenses they stopped to get their defensive ranking are all bottom half except the Chargers at 14 for PPG.

The Vikings are scoring less than 2 PPG more than the Rams and we had the far harder schedule thus far.

The Rams are the better team. This is a should win in my mind.
The defense is what makes the Vikes relevant. The offense can be exposed. For as much love and hype as Bridgewater has received, he's mired in a sophomore slump and simply hasn't built a rapport with his receivers. He's locked in on Diggs and dumps to Rudolph when pressed. Wallace has been invisible and Charles Johnson has been M.I.A as well, he's just getting back to full health to be fair though.

If the defense can keep the clamps on AP, we know where Teddy wants to go with the ball.

Offensively for the Rams it's tough sledding though. Minny is going to play aggressive press coverage and beat on the receivers at the line. Those guys have no problem getting their noses dirty in the run game either. Plus Barr and Kendricks will be working to get up field all game long. The Rams simply have to complete some passes early to keep the defense honest. Zimmer isn't going to be fooled, he knows we're a run first team. The Vikes are giving up 104 a game on the ground. Take away that week one game where they gave up 168 to Hyde (which is a huge outlier) and it's frightening. We'll see what Gurley is made of Sunday.

Their record may be inflated, but at the end of the year it won't matter. I do see the Vikes as direct competition for a Wildcard spot, and if we can't bump them off, we probably don't belong in the big show.
They played Denver close. AP got loose once for half his yards and a TD. I am hopeful Rams are better than that as they have a history of bottling him up. This isn't the defense the Vikings played game one last season, that's for sure.

I don't think the Vikings are any match for the Rams pass rush and secondary. Denver has the #1 sack spot to the Rams #2, in part from this game and 7 sacks. I'm salivating to see what the Rams do.
I'll tell you now, woman-to-woman, that I have zero respect for any woman who would support a man who beats his own child's genitals with a switch. Adrian Peterson is a piece of crap, and when he breaks down, your team will have nothing.
He's averaging 90 yards a game, which is really good, but less than a half a TD a game and just 19th at 4.5 yards per carry. Other than the total yards, that isn't a stud, especially against weak defenses.

His 4 biggest games were Lions twice, Chargers, and Bears. Outside of that he's been below average except a decent game against the Broncos at 81 yards and a TD with 5.1 YPC. The Broncos and Rams are very similar in rushing D, so he can play good Ds sometimes.

Not saying he's not a threat, but he's not having a great season overall and we've had recent success with him.
Strength of schedule: Toughest. Updated 11/2
Rams 3rd
Vikings 24th

http://www.predictionmachine.com/Streng ... -NFL-Teams
I will be embarrassed if the Rams don't win this game. Our defense will play the same in Minnesota, which bodes badly for Teddy Bridgwater AND AP. I think the Cards defense (at their house) is considered legit, and how good were they at stopping Gurley?...and the Packers(in their house), how good were they a stopping Gurley?...the Browns and the Niners (supposedly the only good part about the Niners was their Run D...Pittsburg and Big Ben? I think Ben lasted 3 quarters and their offense scored like 9 points...It's possible that we are relying too much on Gurley and the rest of the Offense is atrophying, but he is such a transcendent talent, it's no wonder.... Necessity will dictate our performance, imo....These players know how big this game is..We will win a low scoring game, and Bridgewater will get knocked silly
It seems to keep coming back to the same thing for me... the passing game simply must improve by a fair margin.

Everything else on this team is in order.

Same anemic passing attack? Makes running harder... few teams in this league win with a one dimensional offense.

Minnesota is the biggest challenge they've faced in three weeks.

I haven't a clue if the Rams are up to this.

I hope they are!
Eh, I think the keys to this game are Foles and Bridgewater. Both have struggled. I think Bridgewater is capable of a lot more. Hopefully, Foles is too.(and is the only one who accomplishes more this weekend)
How do they expect to stop Gurley? No one has done it so far. Not even close. He's as good as AP in his prime already. And our defense is going to beat up on Teddy Bear. As long as the good Rams team shows up, we have a good shot at winning this.
Call me a homer but where the hell do Vikes fans get off talkin sh-t like they're legit?

I definitely want to bust that azz after reading some of those comments.
I did some mulling through their reddit as well, and it may be a small sample size but these guys seem to be riding off wins and not really looking at their team as a whole. Their offense is still garbage and they've barely beaten the bottom of the barrel, but they act like they've already won the Super Bowl. In fact, one poster who proved to be the only sane man there posted that their O is like, two spots better than ours and they all balked and basically said they had no idea their O was so bad. Like.. They weren't watching the team the whole time.

It's kind of weird seeing people be so out of touch with their own team.
We owe them a good stern #### kicking!! Wèek 1 last year needs to be erased with extreme prejudice. 34 to 6 the other way this time!
Their biggest advantage here is being at home. They can keep saying our defense is "pretty good," but I don't think they really understand just how good it has been this year. They haven't come remotely close to facing a defense this talented all year. Bridgewater hasn't seen a pass rush like this his entire career either. Donald is going to be tripled all game.

Ultimately though, I think this young offensive line being on the road doesn't get it done. I understand the "can't stop Gurley" mentality, but it's going to be hard for him to continue to put up numbers every game without literately ANYTHING else from the offense. If you take away his big run against the 49ers, one in which they were in a basic nickle (god knows why?) then he gets 60 that game. I'd like to hope he's good for one of these a game, but teams will start just stacking the box no matter what. It will be up to the Rams to continue to find ways to get him the ball, or take advantage of defense. From everything we've seen the past 2 games, it's pretty obvious they can't. Praying for Foles to come out of this one healthy.
The majority of them were pretty rational and reasonable. Every fan-base has a few of those guys.
what a joke, they barely beat the Bears. You know that team with jay cutler?
ou want to stack the box...boom...screen to Austin.(because that doesn't involve the OL pass blocking)
I wanna absolutely destroy these ####. For all the times they beat us in the 70's. The last two games we played them they crushed us. I think Fish comes out with a vengeance and we go up 14-0 within the first quarter. This game will tell us the future of this team. This is a playoff game already. WE MUST WIN THIS GAME.
Lol you guys crack me up. Hating on a fan base for doing the same thing we do. Besides our D and a few players on O, we are not a good team. Talking up our game while sh!tting on another's who is just about as equal as us is absurd. I understand that's the homer in all of us, but I think this is why a lot of us get really butt hurt off a loss. Ive been trying to keep it level headed and it's a lot less frustrating in the end, trust me.
I picked the Vikings as a play off team this year, they have pieces. Their D is playing well, their O is inconsistent. I for one like Bridgewater quite a bit, not necessarily where he is right now but where I think he will be a couple of years from now.
Big advantage being at home, no idea what the weather is going to be like. I will say this however, in the season opener when SF put pressure on Bridgewater he can go into a box. I see both teams trying to dominate with the run. Tight game with things opening up later in the game. Overall I give our D the edge, their passing game, our running game.
Close game with big playoff implications. If the Rams wins this they are 7-3 at the 10 game mark. I think the Rams beat the Bengals as well.
Foles needs to step up. What does it tell you when opposing fans each week mention how terrible he is?
For the most part they sound a lot like Rams fans. The level headed ones anyways. I think it's best described as level headed optimism. We know what they are capable of doing. And we know they're also capable of blowing it, we just keep rooting for the best.
Point blank I want to beat them and move to 5-3. I just hope we get a good effort from the offense. I believe our defense can limit them. to 20 or less points.
It's going to be an interesting thing to watch. Sure, they like to threaten a double A gap blitz, but we seem to be comfortable with a fullback, running back, and three wide out, and of course Gurley and Tavon are both really dangerous on the outside.

And it's not like we haven't struggled with Peterson on outside runs last year. I'm really excited to see how the this plays out. Both teams are very well coached defensively.
User avatar
jackal
Strong Safety
Posts: 11583
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 2:05 am
Location: California
x 5

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by jackal »

They talk a lot about last season loss and things that don't matter.. I wouldn't say I am confident, but their fan base does not seem
very knowledgeable. Other than the SF game we have played some really good football. Yes I agree Detroit and Bears are not good teams
but going 3-0 in Division is a statement. I believe we go 5-1 in this division maybe 6-0 with some luck. That almost is a wildcard at worst.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
User avatar
Crax
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1908
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2008 9:48 am
Location: Utah
x 31

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by Crax »

All good points. The Vikes should have lost today and to the Lions - they got lucky both times. This is another team we should stomp on and never let up for air. This could be the message game to the NFL talking heads that will predict another "Letdown game":

The Rams are for REAL.
How did we get lucky against the Lions? We beat them by two scores both times and the pass rush was killing them. It wasn't like we pulled one out with a hail mary or something. I don't know how anyone could think we weren't better than the lions in both those games.
Skoltastic_Voyage
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 535
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 1:27 pm

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by Skoltastic_Voyage »

Can we be realistic? This game is about as even (on paper) as it gets. Vikings and Rams could be a battle of the ages or a complete debacle because one team decides to be bone headed. Their fans for the most part seem like we do. Knowing this is a test for both teams. This is the first reality check and Thor willing there will be lightning bolts showering around a victorious Vikings but from what I read Rams fans are in the EXACT state of mind we're in... Let the games begin!
My guide to being a Vikings fan:
Step 1.) Drink beer.
Step 2.) See step 1.
Boon
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 671
Joined: Sun Sep 14, 2014 6:28 pm
x 32

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by Boon »

Vikings need this game so bad, i'm glad it's at home
User avatar
LondonViking
Backup
Posts: 51
Joined: Thu Sep 18, 2014 7:05 am
Location: London, UK

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by LondonViking »

I feel this one could be a war in the trenches sort of game
autobon7
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1044
Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by autobon7 »

LondonViking wrote:I feel this one could be a war in the trenches sort of game

Agree.......does anyone know the injury status of Cole? We could sure use him.
Norv Zimmer
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 901
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:21 pm
x 5

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by Norv Zimmer »

I wanna know if floyd is playing. Anyone e have any info??? We sure could use him this one!
dead_poet
Commissioner
Posts: 24788
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
x 108

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by dead_poet »

Norv Zimmer wrote:I wanna know if floyd is playing. Anyone e have any info??? We sure could use him this one!
Zimmer won't talk about injuries. We'll only know from practice reports, which will be released today at some point. The beat guys should provide some insight on whether or not they see Floyd during practice periods open to the media.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9856
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1891

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

It's always interesting to read other teams' forums.

Playing amateur psychoanalyst, I'd say that Rams fans seem to be a bit defensive about the way the football world views their team. Like they don't get the credit they deserve.

Here's the problem. The Rams had their run in the late 90s and early 2000s, but they haven't been relevant for a long time. In fact, they haven't had a winning season since 2003 and have lost 10 or more games 6 times in that span, including 4 seasons of 3 wins or fewer. So I'd say that Rams fans should savor any respect they get.

And the fact is that they have our respect, at least for the upcoming game. Nobody on THIS board is predicting an easy win for our Vikings, and I'm fairly sure Mike Zimmer isn't.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1513
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
x 90

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by chicagopurple »

I gotta admit, the Rams fans are very reasonable and logical in their assessments! I find most fan sites to be skewed and lopsided but I guess St Louis fans are pretty sober. If nothing else, it should be a tight game if both teams play up to their current potential.
Norv Zimmer
Pro Bowl Elite Player
Posts: 901
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 7:21 pm
x 5

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by Norv Zimmer »

chicagopurple wrote:I gotta admit, the Rams fans are very reasonable and logical in their assessments! I find most fan sites to be skewed and lopsided but I guess St Louis fans are pretty sober. If nothing else, it should be a tight game if both teams play up to their current potential.
Yet not one on their prediction page predicts the Rams to lose.
User avatar
chicagopurple
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1513
Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
x 90

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by chicagopurple »

why would they.....the biggest edge the Vikes have this week is home field......QB vs QB is pretty close only because Teddy's play has slipped lately and against bad teams, RB vs RB is pretty close..their guy is younger and not dinged up and their OL is far better. Defense is close but our entire LB corp is injured......why would a Rams fan pick the Vikes?
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by DK Sweets »

If their O-line is better than ours (which I don't agree with) it's not even worth mentioning. That's like saying my Big Mac is a finer dining experience than your Taco Bell burrito.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: Enemy Fan Forums: St. Louis Rams

Post by DK Sweets »

Saturday Update:
The obvious: Big game at this point in the season, and both teams know it. There is no doubt that both squads will look to establish the run early and often. Both defenses are solid while both OLines have question marks. Who will protect the passer, and convert 3rd downs? That will determine your winner. Easy to say, tough to do against these Defenses.

The overlooked: Rob Havenstein has been very good so far while Greg Robinson still looks fresh off the draft stage a lot of the time; especially against speed rushers. If Rob misses this game(Questionable: Achillies), and with GRob potentially going up against Anthony Barr(Questionable: Back), this OLine could really have its hands full.

Sharrif Floyd(DT) is out, as well as Eric Kendricks(LB) per NFL.com. This should take a little bit of pressure off the OLine, but not much due to the solid depth the Vikings carry.

Chris Long is out but William Hayes is hardly a drop off IMO. We won't be missing much from the D unless TJ McDonald is out with a foot. He's had issues with his shoulder, and now his foot is nagging him. This will be interesting to see how his situation progresses come game time. One thing is for sure, Mo Alexander did a fine job when utilizing his playing time last week, and man does he fit this defensive scheme well.

Foles has had success against the Vikings in the past, but can he duplicate what he's done to them before? Not likely with this west coast system. But,if he has over 100.0 QBR and doesn't turn it over, the Rams have a good shot to take a victory from Minneapolis, Minnesota.

The Verdict: A classic grudge match of west coast "knock-em'-down drag-em'-out" kind of game is what appears to be in the forecast aside from cold air. I personally, think that the OC that can make adjustments to keep the QB upright during the second half; will win this game. As mentioned in "The Obvious" portion, lack of penalties, and 3rd down efficiency will go a long way for either team.

The Sleeper: Player- Stedman Bailey. Situation- Secure 'Time of possession' and let Gurley wear them down.

Rams 20
Vikings 13
Turnovers

If the Rams win that battle hey should win the game. The Rams defense has been so good lately but they haven't faced a back with APs tools this season. I wonder if the defense focusing on him, will the passing game open up for Minnesota. I hope not.

I am hoping for this offense to start clicking and so far they keep letting me down. It does not seem likely that it will happen this week either.

Rams 21
Vikings 12
I like this matchup for the Rams. The Rams defense should be able to exploit a weak Vikings OL. If the Rams are getting pressure on Bridgewater and with the Rams corners playing so well, I expect to see some Vikings turnovers. Stopping Peterson is obviously a key. This matchup is an advantage to the Rams with their very good defense against a mediocre OL.

On the other side Jamon Brown and GRob are both maulers in the run game and the Gurley Express should keep right on chugging along even without Havenstein. The Vikings defense has looked good but has also played weak competition. The key for the Rams on offense is to get Gurley going and get the ball out of Foles hands quickly. Foles can't afford to have another game like he had at Green Bay. Put the ball into Gurley's hands to win you the game, not Foles. Find ways to get Tavon Austin the ball. He is a dynamic playmaker who is lethal in space. The misdirection play with Gurley and Austin is majic. If they give Austin the edge it is a TD and if the spread out too much Gurley will smash it down the middle.

The Rams are on the cusp of being an elite team in this league. They just need to make sure they don't beat themselves because their talent is through the roof right now. The Rams defense is absolutely tops in my book. They will make Teddy look like a young QB on Sunday and Gurley will have another big day. Rams 24 Vikings 18
Vikes have had trouble converting in the red zone, Rams have had success keeping teams out of the endzone. Vikes can't win without scoring touchdowns.

Rams will need a big play or two. Rams can score in all three phases, offense, defense or special teams. Just take care of the ball, don't give up a fumble-TD or pick-6.
I totally concur with @Elmgrovegnome turnovers win this game and the quarterback who turns the ball over the least will be the field general that leads their team to victory. I also give the Vikings a huge edge at placekicker as IMO, Blair Walsh is much more consistent then Greg Zuerlein especially lately.

I also feel that Adrian Peterson might want to take it upon himself to showcase that he is still the premier running back in the NFL. I'm hoping that Nick Foles has a coming out party and takes advantage of a secondary that is vulnerable with Jarrod Cook becoming the hero instead of the goat.

Rams...23
Vikings...20
Emphasis mine. We have the more consistent kicker...what a weird world we live in.
Gotta try and strip it from Peterson, he's a fumbler. Win the turnover battle or score on defense and we have a great chance...

Rams 24
Vikes 17
Just not that worried about Peterson. We are not going to let him beat us tomorrow.
How does he sit down with cajones that big?
You obviously have seen a Rams game this season or paid attention to any of the highlight shows. No way in hell does minn score over 10 points, probably only 6 as that is what the rams have been giving up lately. But I'll give AP the benefit of the doubt and maybe he can get that elusive TD that teams just cant seem to find when going up against the Rams D. Remember the Rams D held Green Bay to 17 offensive points in Green Bay.
Finally, a fan base that is arrogant. Honestly, it's no fun when we read a forum where the fans are blasting themselves. I have a lot of respect for what the Vikings have done. They are a good team. This will be a tough game. But yes, many of them are strongly underestimating us. I mean even the Cards fan base wasn't this cocky and by most all accounts the Cards are better than the Vikings.

Let's just set the record straight. Many, many, fans wrote us off the week we lost to Washington. That's a game we should have one. This team is far different looking with Gurlry in the mix.

Did anyone tell them Gurley had 138 yards rushing against the Niners? Sure, that's nothing, right? Well it's actually a heck of a lot when you consider the Rams pulled him with fives minutes to go in the third quarter. Then you factor in the Vikings got waxed by the Niners.

Silly Viqueens fans :LOL:

Fact of the matter is we take the lead of the sixth wild card slot once we win this game. And yeah, I'm predicting a win. Our defense is playing lights out right now and they can't keep Gurley and Tavon both grounded with giving a big one up to Cook or Britt. Peterson did nothing against us last year and that was before Donald. It's common for a top RB to have a humdrum day against us.
How about the Vikings are absolutely no different at all from when you played the Niners and you guys have played one team with a record of .500 or better. Oh yeah, that includes the Lions twice. And the Washinton game, Gurley didn't even play. Pretty clear difference when he does.

You guys got fat on inferior opponents. I want you to watch the Vikings to go into shock once Donald starts muddying the back field and Mark Barron, TJ McDonald, or Joyner (Shoot, they all hit. Rams defenders ALL hit! Vikings just... wrap up lol.) drops the hammer on Ole' Peterson. I don't think Terrible Teddy is gonna be ready for the heat he's about to get. And believe me, it's coming buddy. I don't recall hearing your OL is dominant at anything. You're gonna see exactly where your at this week.

And though I know this is a big game for us, this is a must win for you guys. Vikings lose this game, they're sitting home during the playoffs. We could still win our division, you guys can't IMO. Despite an off game against the Broncos, the NFC North Title perinially belongs to the Packers.
Did you just make a post about what Vikings fans think about what Rams fans think about what Vikings fans think?

Dude....
Raptorman wrote:Peterson was pulled at the 7:48 mark in the 4th quarter after gaining 212 yards on 24 attempts. Dec. 16, 2012. Team the Vikings were playing. The Rams. In St. Louis.
:beerock:
Another fun fact:

The Vikings have allowed their opponents to gain .54 yards per carry MORE against them than those opponents have averaged in all their other games.

Another fun fact:

The Rams have held their opponents to .58 yards per carry LESS against them than those opponents have averaged in all their other games.
More fun facts.

Minnesota's D allows 17.4 points per game. Their 7 opponents have scored an average of 20.44 points per game. The Minnesota D has, therefore, held their opponents collectively to 3.04 points per game less than the rest of the league.

STL's D allows 17.9 points per game. Their 7 opponents have scored an average of 22.19 points per game. The STL D has, therefore, held their opponents collectively to 4.29 points per game less than the rest of the league.

Minnesota's O scores 21.0 points per game. Their 7 opponents have allowed an average of 26.17 points per game. The Minnesota O has, therefore, scored collectively 5.17 points per game less than the rest of the league scores against Minnesota's opponents.

STL's O scores 19.3 points per game. Their 7 opponents have allowed an average of 21.5 points per game. The STL O has, therefore, scored collectively 2.2 points per game less than the rest of the league scores against STL's opponents.

My conclusion: So far this year, we both have good scoring defenses but the STL D is about 1.25 points per game better than the MN D and, so far this year, we both have mediocre offenses but the STL O performs about a FG better against their opponents than does the MN O.

But, on any given Sunday . . .. Should be a good game.
Honestly, when I watch AP's running style, I do not think of Gurley and vice versa. They are TOTALLY different backs IMO. Adrian is much more violent and has better quick twitch ability. Really, the best I have ever seen in a back his size (Earl Campbell a distant second). TGII looks more like Eric Dickerson to me. Patient, able to read blocks and explode NORTH/SOUTH through a hole. Both backs have an excellent top gear.

As much as I love me some TGII, I think AP is still the gold standard for RBs in this league. TGII may soon surpass him, but I just cannot put him there after 4 games. If you asked Gurley, I bet he would tell you the same thing. For those that think AP has lost a step, I think you may need to watch film of him this season. Looks as good as ever to me. The Rams will get his absolute best on Sunday with all of the comparison talk. The Vikes can expect the same from TGII. Should be fun to watch.
The Vikings defense is 25th in the NFL in ypc (4.4 per attempt) against some really crappy running teams. They played: San Diego 30th at 3.6 ypc, Lions twice 29th at 3.7 ypc, Denver 26th at 3.8 a carry, Chicago 24th 3.9 a carry and without Forte a big chunk of the game, San Fran 22nd at 3.9 a carry. The only good running team they faced was KC and that was without without J. Charles.

Their yards per attempt given up is much greater than how the rest of the league fared against those teams. If they actually had a good run defense thy would have at least done better than the league average.

The yards don't mean anything when you face pass happy teams. The Vikings are 11th in rushing yards allowed and have the 5th least rushing attempts on them in the league.

I'll take the over on 150 yards for Gurley.
lol they're all hype on Diggs which is cool... but Janoris got that man on lock down. I'd love to see Bridgewater take a shot at the jackrabbit.
The guy that said 43-12 Vikes must be high as a kite. How does he suddenly expect one of the worst offenses to put up 40+ on one of the best defenses.
Apparently they expect as many TD's in one game as we've basically given up all year.

OK Viking fans, time to put the joint down.
Didn't go back and watch the game but I'm not sure if 6 rec and 87 yds is making anyone look like a rookie. Especially on 10 targets and with two fumble. He looks productive and had great speed but does he have a fumbling issue? I know the Rams like to allow the short passes and then hammer the receiver. I know people look at the Rams giving up a high percentage of completions but most of those are quick passes to try to mitigate the Rams pressure on the QB. And as to your question about JJ, he is playing the best football of his career and in the GB game Rodgers threw his way ONCE. He defended that pass and wasn't thrown at again in that game. So if Rodgers is giving JJ the Sherman treatment what do you think that says? So if you don't mind me asking you a question, do you thinking Bridgewater is better than Rodgers?

Note- In the past JJ was prone to bite on the double move and his aggressiveness got him burnt, this year he has elevated him game and has been much more disciplined. He also had the most pick 6 over that last 3 years in the NFL with 5.
A lot of great banter back and forth. The reality is we're all homers for our teams so it doesn't really matter if anything any of us says is realistic.
Who have they played, who have we played? You know at the end of the day any team can beat any team on any given day.
These teams are pretty similar in a lot of ways. I'm not going to make any predictions because we haven't been very good on the road. I'd be more confident if the game was in St.Louis. One thing I will say is I love Gurley but there is no way I'm underestimating AP. Dude is one of the best of all time, IMO. From a pure football perspective I have to respect what he brings. Like Gurley, he can break one at any time.

I think this game comes down to who plays the smartest. If we don't turn the ball over, have 10+ penalties or give up big plays we should win.
But that's the million dollar wait and see question right now. If Minnesota finds a way to limit Gurley and Austin and we have to rely on Foles we could be in trouble.
I don't see it happening but we'll see.

I think this will be a very hard fought, physical game that is decided in the 4th quarter.
Yes but the Rams have been more opportunistic in taking advantage of the turnovers.
Rams +49 points
Vikings +22 points
I met some people from Minnesota in Mexico once. This is what they said to me "do you get snow in London"? Absolutely clueless they were, I hope you are as well and the Rams win big on Sunday
:lol:
Conventional wisdom would dictate AD will be pretty jacked up for this game... He probably feels primed for a 200 yard game, then again how that saying go? "Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the nose".

Dudes better days are behind him, that should be obvious, On the other hand TGs just getting started, gotta like what we've seen after the first 4 games.

This has all the makings of great game, can't wait. Foles better be ready to call some audibles... He doesn't seem be very good at that to date
Don't group all of us together.

Dude was out of line saying the Packers RBs are ANYWHERE close to AP. You were out of line saying any of your WRs are as good in space as Austin - some of them are better all around players than Austin, don't get me wrong - but there aren't too many players in the NFL as good as he is in space.

As for this game, I have a hard time seeing the Rams winning it. I think we are a better all around team....as in I'd take our roster over the Vikings....but your passing game is ahead of ours right now, and we're on the road.

We can't convert a 3rd down to save our lives, and I don't really see that changing against a top flight defense. Hope I'm wrong.
You obviously have seen a Rams game this season or paid attention to any of the highlight shows. No way in hell does minn score over 10 points, probably only 6 as that is what the rams have been giving up lately. But I'll give AP the benefit of the doubt and maybe he can get that elusive TD that teams just cant seem to find when going up against the Rams D. Remember the Rams D held Green Bay to 17 offensive points in Green Bay.
Post Reply