It wouldn't be a point of emphasis if it were nitpicking.TeddyBaller wrote:
meh sounds like nitpicking
Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Agreed. It only seems like nitpicking if you don't understand the effect that elbow placement has on the trajectory and accuracy of the pass.PacificNorseWest wrote: It wouldn't be a point of emphasis if it were nitpicking.
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Exactly... and I thought your earlier post was right on target.PacificNorseWest wrote: It wouldn't be a point of emphasis if it were nitpicking.
By the way, this article might be where you read that elbow mechanics have been a point of emphasis for Bridgewater this year:
Bridgewater is not yet in Rivers' stratosphere, but his late-season surge revealed the attributes -- accuracy and anticipation -- that have powered Rivers over the years. Early ball placement issues were addressed with a focus on elbow mechanics, something Bridgewater focused on all offseason. ("Sometimes if I drop my elbow too low," he said, "a ball may sail on me.") And when asked about Bridgewater's relatively quick assimilation of his scheme, Turner referenced another likely Hall of Fame quarterback.
-
- Career Elite Player
- Posts: 2936
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
- Location: Seattle, Wa
- x 150
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
^Appreciated. I believe that may have been it.
I keep my elbow up.Exactly... and I thought your earlier post was right on target.
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Well done!PacificNorseWest wrote:^Appreciated. I believe that may have been it.
I keep my elbow up.
Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
*slow clap*PacificNorseWest wrote: I keep my elbow up.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Jordysghost wrote: Maybe it ended for you, but 3000+ yards on the season and 7 more tds then Bridge, all while playing with the Raiders, definitley indicates that there is still a reasonable argument for Carr.
empty stats for carr 28th best qb in the league last year behind geno smith, sounds about right, and about the td's 6 of carr's 21 td passes came from the 1 yard line
http://espn.go.com/nfl/qbr
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Carr ranked lower than Smith. More evidence QBR is the most ridiculous stat ever created to try and fill television time...
-
- Starter
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Demi wrote:Carr ranked lower than Smith. More evidence QBR is the most ridiculous stat ever created to try and fill television time...
carr's advanced stats were NOT good bro.. stop trying to make derek carr happen
he had a better o-line than teddy last year, and a better wide reciever corp, and still teddy was better. teddy has drew brees potential
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
21-12 td int ratio and 3000+ yards, nobody needs to make Carr happen, he did that on his own. I think Teddy had a far better WR core last year as well.TeddyBaller wrote:
carr's advanced stats were NOT good bro.. stop trying to make derek carr happen
he had a better o-line than teddy last year, and a better wide reciever corp, and still teddy was better. teddy has drew brees potential
I think Teddy is the best QB from his draft class and will remain as such, but if you want to talk potential Carr has everything physically you want in a QB.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Yes, Carr is "happening" whether anyone wants him to "happen" or not.Jordysghost wrote:21-12 td int ratio and 3000+ yards, nobody needs to make Carr happen, he did that on his own. I think Teddy had a far better WR core last year as well.
I think Teddy is the best QB from his draft class and will remain as such, but if you want to talk potential Carr has everything physically you want in a QB.
I don't really think it matters which of the two QBs (Carr or Bridgewater) is better. They both had solid rookie seasons. They both have the potential to be better this year and beyond. They play in completely different conferences so it's not as if they'll face off much. It matters in the sense that the Vikes had the choice to draft either one of them and they chose Bridgewater. Obviously, we Vikes fans want that to be the "right" choice and so far, so good. However, it may turn out that there wasn't really a wrong choice to be made between Carr and Bridgewater.
The Vikes may have dodged a bullet with Manziel though. Time will tell!
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9241
- Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 3:38 am
- Location: Watertown, NY
- x 1117
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Yeah I definitely think Teddy is the better QB but Oakland WRs were probably one of the worst in the NFL so there is no way ours was worse. I think Carr is going to be a good QB. A lot better than Bortles. He just got a great weapon in Cooper and I like Murray. I think he'll be comparable to a Ryan Tannehill type QB with a much better deep ball. I can see the Teddy/Brees comparisonTeddyBaller wrote:
carr's advanced stats were NOT good bro.. stop trying to make derek carr happen
he had a better o-line than teddy last year, and a better wide reciever corp, and still teddy was better. teddy has drew brees potential
The saddest thing in life is wasted talent and the choices you make will shape your life forever.
-Chazz Palminteri
-Chazz Palminteri
-
- Starter
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Jordysghost wrote: 21-12 td int ratio and 3000+ yards, nobody needs to make Carr happen, he did that on his own. I think Teddy had a far better WR core last year as well.
I think Teddy is the best QB from his draft class and will remain as such, but if you want to talk potential Carr has everything physically you want in a QB.
carr's completion % and passer rating was garbage,..... carr only passed for 3,000+ yards because he started from day 1, bridgewater took over week 4... and damn near caught carr in passing yards lol
Last edited by TeddyBaller on Sat Aug 29, 2015 8:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Starter
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 1:58 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Pondering Her Percy wrote: Yeah I definitely think Teddy is the better QB but Oakland WRs were probably one of the worst in the NFL so there is no way ours was worse. I think Carr is going to be a good QB. A lot better than Bortles. He just got a great weapon in Cooper and I like Murray. I think he'll be comparable to a Ryan Tannehill type QB with a much better deep ball. I can see the Teddy/Brees comparison
only greg jennings and charles johnson could run consistent routes last year, a lot of teddy ints were on cordelle patterson not knowing how to run routes... teddy unlike carr anticipates throws and throws guys open like a brees and rodgers
mike wallace looks like a bust trade, dude cant run routes just like flash... such a shame, imagine teddy with a freak wideout like amari cooper, instead we took a bum like trae waynes
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: Theodore Bridgewater: Year One --> Year Two
Im not saying Carr is better then Teddy, im saying he had a decent rookie year, and he did. 21-12 td int ratio with 3000+ yards is solid, especially for a rookie. Facts are facts.
Last edited by Jordysghost on Sat Aug 29, 2015 8:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011