No doubt he would be an immediate upgrade to any MLB that you have on your roster.Jordysghost wrote:I wanted Kendricks, you cold bastards.
2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3565
- Joined: Sun Apr 22, 2012 9:55 pm
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Do not mistake KINDNESS for WEAKNESS!
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
Best to keep your mouth shut and be thought a fool rather than open it and remove all doubt.
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Yup, outside of Clay when we put him there, for sure. But I'm happy we got Jake Ryan, he's exactly the kind of thumper ive been aching for.Purple bruise wrote: No doubt he would be an immediate upgrade to any MLB that you have on your roster.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Green Bay might have a good offense, their defense looks slow and reactive ...
Kendricks highlights, remind me of Luke Keechly(sp) from the panthers a lot ...
All over the field, making plays
Kendricks highlights, remind me of Luke Keechly(sp) from the panthers a lot ...
All over the field, making plays
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
All fan allegiance aside, I think its pretty silly to say the reigning number 1 scoring offense in the league "might" have a good offense. jmo tho.jackal wrote:Green Bay might have a good offense, their defense looks slow and reactive ...
Kendricks highlights, remind me of Luke Keechly(sp) from the panthers a lot ...
All over the field, making plays
While I'm not exactly sold all the way with the direction TT is trying to go with this defense, I disagree entirely with your slow and reactive sentiment, I think, if anything, Thompson has showed a continued assertion in finding athletic ability to build an athletic defense. As I said, I'm not sold 100% on some of our recent decisions toward the defensive side of the ball, I just think that "Slow and reactive", would be an inaccurate way to describe it. I might also add that last year, your defense averaged 21.4 points per game, the Packers Defense was not far behind with 21.8
I agree with your Kendricks and Luke comparison as well, btw.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
-
- Hall of Fame Candidate
- Posts: 3927
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 5:45 pm
- Location: Hawaii
- x 151
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Joined: Aug 2006
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Deleted: Sept 12 2014
Reborn: Sept 17 2014
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
One thing I love is when Spielman was talking about scouting Anthony Barr last year and how much they liked him, they also noticed this other guy was zipping all over the field making plays as often as Barr was. Fast forward to next year and he's still making those plays, of course I'm talking about Barr's teammate Kendricks. I just thought it was cool that they noticed him back then and we were able to draft him in the 2nd this year.
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Have that video? That'd be cool to watch.mondry wrote:One thing I love is when Spielman was talking about scouting Anthony Barr last year and how much they liked him, they also noticed this other guy was zipping all over the field making plays as often as Barr was. Fast forward to next year and he's still making those plays, of course I'm talking about Barr's teammate Kendricks. I just thought it was cool that they noticed him back then and we were able to draft him in the 2nd this year.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
It's actually in the audio of the one you posted in the "rick spielmans post draft interview" I'll find the time for you one second.dead_poet wrote: Have that video? That'd be cool to watch.
edit- they start talking about kendricks at 6:45 and the thing i was referring to is around 7:15
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
I said might meaning; yeah you guys have a good offense.All fan allegiance aside, I think its pretty silly to say the reigning number 1 scoring offense in the league "might" have a good offense. jmo tho.
While I'm not exactly sold all the way with the direction TT is trying to go with this defense, I disagree entirely with your slow and reactive sentiment, I think, if anything, Thompson has showed a continued assertion in finding athletic ability to build an athletic defense. As I said, I'm not sold 100% on some of our recent decisions toward the defensive side of the ball, I just think that "Slow and reactive", would be an inaccurate way to describe it. I might also add that last year, your defense averaged 21.4 points per game, the Packers Defense was not far behind with 21.8
I think your offense actually hides your defenses weakness, which is a benefit of scoring and getting first downs.
IMO Peterson and improved OL(if that happens) will close the gap and we split games with you guys this season.
The rams are very talented, and the one game we had with Peterson, we tore them up.
The Bears are a mess and Detroit has declined due to key losses... If the lions can get their running game going and calm
down Stafford wild throws for picks it will between us and them for second place.
no one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
-
- Packers Suck
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:40 pm
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
I feel you man, but I could counter that our quick scoring offense in 2011 made our already crappy defense even more tired and crappy then usual. I think now, the defense holds up far better and that isn't an easy task always being on the field with little rest. Jmo. I don't think there is any denying they are an athletic bunch, though.jackal wrote: I said might meaning; yeah you guys have a good offense.
I think your offense actually hides your defenses weakness, which is a benefit of scoring and getting first downs.
IMO Peterson and improved OL(if that happens) will close the gap and we split games with you guys this season.
The rams are very talented, and the one game we had with Peterson, we tore them up.
The Bears are a mess and Detroit has declined due to key losses... If the lions can get their running game going and calm
down Stafford wild throws for picks it will between us and them for second place.
The Bears are terrible, lol. Just terrible, I didn't understand the hype for them going into last year, the Lions I believe are declining but may still be a factor this upcoming season. Btw, I think you guys could be competing for 1st in the division, not just second.
Especially if, as you said, your O line improves.
"Follow my lead today, whos goona be the big dog with me?" - Aaron Rodgers, February 6th, 2011
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Kendricks: I Have A Knack For Chasing The Ball
http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/vide ... f0892283aa
http://www.vikings.com/media-vault/vide ... f0892283aa
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
#54 and #55 are going to kick some serious butt.
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
Maybe we can bring Jared Allen back to snap him the ball.Rieux wrote:Hey, look: in high school, Kendricks was also a punter.
Vikings fans who were wondering when the team would bring in some competition for Jeff Locke—there's your answer.
- CbusVikesFan
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1395
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
- Location: Columbus, Ohio
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
I've patiently been waiting for this kind of jackhammering to occur this year. Whoop!PurpleKoolaid wrote:#54 and #55 are going to kick some serious butt.
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: 2.45 Vikings select LB- Eric Kendricks UCLA
In Zimmer's scheme, Kendricks looks like a three-down linebacker
http://blog.startribune.com/in-zimmer-s ... 303397001/
http://blog.startribune.com/in-zimmer-s ... 303397001/
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly