what was better?

A forum for the hard core Minnesota Vikings fan. Discuss upcoming games, opponents, trades, draft or what ever is on the minds of Viking fans!

Moderator: Moderators

mosscarter
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1056
Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 2:34 am

what was better?

Post by mosscarter »

watching favre in purple beating green bay twice, or watching them lose tonight the way they did? i'm in favor of the former.
PurpleMustReign
Starting Wide Receiver
Posts: 19150
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2005 5:48 pm
Location: Crystal, MN
x 114
Contact:

Re: what was better?

Post by PurpleMustReign »

Not even close... The former for sure.

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
The Devil whispered in the Viking's ear, "There's a storm coming." The Viking replied, "I am the storm." ‪#‎SKOL2018
User avatar
Raptorman
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3403
Joined: Wed Aug 30, 2006 10:23 pm
Location: Sebastian, FL
x 67

Re: what was better?

Post by Raptorman »

Well it's simple. For the past few years all I have been hearing from Packer fans is about Favre interception in New Orleans and how it cost the Vikings a trip to the Super Bowl. I can tell you I won't be hearing that one anymore. At least the Vikings didn't blow a 16 point lead in the game.
Vikings fan since Nov. 6, 1966. Annoying Packer fans since Nov. 7, 1966
J. Kapp 11
Hall of Famer
Posts: 9774
Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
x 1859

Re: what was better?

Post by J. Kapp 11 »

The former.

I actually wanted them to beat Seattle, then lose the Super Bowl.
Image
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
losperros
Commissioner
Posts: 10041
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:47 am
Location: Burbank, California

Re: what was better?

Post by losperros »

I'll go against the grain here and say the Seattle win over GB is better. What a finish!

But then, it's difficult for me to be fond of the Chili years, regardless who was playing QB.
User avatar
Mothman
Defensive Tackle
Posts: 38292
Joined: Wed Mar 26, 2003 11:48 am
Location: Chicago, IL
x 409

Re: what was better?

Post by Mothman »

losperros wrote:I'll go against the grain here and say the Seattle win over GB is better. What a finish!

But then, it's difficult for me to be fond of the Chili years, regardless who was playing QB.
Ditto, Craig. Yesterday's finish was one of the most memorable ends to a championship game that I can remember and for once, watching an NFC North/Central team blow their chance to reach the Super Bowl was actually a positive experience for me. :twisted:
The Breeze
Hall of Fame Inductee
Posts: 4016
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 8:14 pm
Location: So. Utah

Re: what was better?

Post by The Breeze »

I woulda been more happy with the former if Favre hadn't come back and got thumped by GB the next season. I was really tickled by that stat that GB was the only team to never have beaten Brent Favre....until that second season.

That defeat yesterday was demoralizing. The onside kick...TJack at the coin toss....blowing a 16pt lead. That's even harder to take than 41-0 IMO.

I'll laugh quietly to myself for years over this one.
frosted
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2157
Joined: Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:30 pm
Location: Minneapolis

Re: what was better?

Post by frosted »

The scenario that involves the Vikings winning, no brainer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
saint33
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1653
Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 12:28 am

Re: what was better?

Post by saint33 »

This one was more satisfying for me. The fact that we had to beat them with their QB kinda taints those victories, and they're only regular season games.

Seeing them collapse on all fronts yesterday was so unbelievably satisfying. My packer fan brother has yet to respond to my text messages, it's beautiful
Image
User avatar
CbusVikesFan
All Pro Elite Player
Posts: 1395
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 8:07 pm
Location: Columbus, Ohio

Re: what was better?

Post by CbusVikesFan »

I cannot distinguish which is better. :confused: Any Packer misery, no matter how it manifests itself, is wonderful. :thumbsup: I found it great this year that the Bears sucked worse than the Vikings, the Pack choked like a fat man on a piece of steak, :rofl: the Cowgirls got punched in the throat, the Steelers went down, 49ers suck again, and the Lions fell short again.
To me, all of those scenarios are just peachy keen on a yearly basis. :v):
Image
Don't hate on my Buckeyes. Some of the best Vikings went to Ohio State.
Including now, HOF WR #80 Cris Carter
User avatar
Wild Bill
Transition Player
Posts: 364
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 6:13 pm
Location: Orlando FL
Contact:

Re: what was better?

Post by Wild Bill »

Raptorman wrote:Well it's simple. For the past few years all I have been hearing from Packer fans is about Favre interception in New Orleans and how it cost the Vikings a trip to the Super Bowl. I can tell you I won't be hearing that one anymore. At least the Vikings didn't blow a 16 point lead in the game.

I agree!!! That collapse and amazing plays by Seattle were just =insert superlative=. No that word is not big enough to describe what happened. No words can really capture that sequence of events. I have a friend who has been a Seahawk fan since at least 10 yrs old. He posted a congrats to Packers message on facebook. THEN !!!!!!!!! If either team had been the Vikings I would have been in the ER. Give him all we got ####CLEAR#### Zap still nothing hit him again######CLEAR##### Zap we lost this one nurse. Tell the family....OH they are still watching the game.
Wild Bill
"Sometimes We Live No Particular Way But Our Own"...Hunter,Garcia
User avatar
PurpleKoolaid
Hall of Famer
Posts: 8641
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
x 28

Re: what was better?

Post by PurpleKoolaid »

Seattle beating GB in the final seconds. Couldn't script it any better. Plus, I like Seattle (not even close to how I love the Vikings of course). Favre, in my book, will always be 99.9% Packer.
DK Sweets
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2908
Joined: Sun Aug 18, 2013 8:46 am
Location: Missouri

Re: what was better?

Post by DK Sweets »

I'll always be find of the 09 season, even if Favre will always be a Packer. That game yesterday was fun in a vindictive way, but when WE win, it's better.
PacificNorseWest
Career Elite Player
Posts: 2936
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 1:10 am
Location: Seattle, Wa
x 150

Re: what was better?

Post by PacificNorseWest »

DKSweets wrote:I'll always be find of the 09 season, even if Favre will always be a Packer. That game yesterday was fun in a vindictive way, but when WE win, it's better.

All of this.
mansquatch
Hall of Fame Candidate
Posts: 3836
Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2005 2:44 pm
Location: Coon Rapids, MN
x 117

Re: what was better?

Post by mansquatch »

I loved the 1999 season, the finish against SF with that rope to Greg Lewis remains the single best football moment I've ever experienced. That being said, I felt a great deal of evil pleasure watching all the rantings and ravings of the Packer fans after Sunday's defeat. It was bittersweet since I recall so much of their snark both times that it has happened to us.

My three least favorite teams right now are the Seahawks, Cowboys, and Packers. I knew Carolina wasn't going to get the job done, so I've been an anti-fan during all of the playoffs. That being said, as much as I disliked seeing the Seahawks go back to the big game, there is still no team I despise more than the Packers.

I would still rather watch us win than them lose, but when you don't have the former, the latter will do just fine. :evil:
Winning is not a sometime thing it is an all of the time thing - Vince Lombardi
Post Reply