100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Moderator: Moderators
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
- x 21
100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... -for-bills
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... eculation/
Okay. I understand this team would probably not make a move if Spiller were available. It is pretty improbable given that we will want to give Jerrick every opportunity. However, given the whole Peterson situation and the fact he may never play for us again, it raises an interesting question.
Compensation for Spiller may be more than his current market value. However, if Buffalo does indeed put him on the block and he is available for a fourth round pick or lower, I would be interested in pulling the trigger.
Thoughts from anyone? I am sorry if this didn't deserve its own thread, but I didn't see a trade deadline thread posted.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... eculation/
Okay. I understand this team would probably not make a move if Spiller were available. It is pretty improbable given that we will want to give Jerrick every opportunity. However, given the whole Peterson situation and the fact he may never play for us again, it raises an interesting question.
Compensation for Spiller may be more than his current market value. However, if Buffalo does indeed put him on the block and he is available for a fourth round pick or lower, I would be interested in pulling the trigger.
Thoughts from anyone? I am sorry if this didn't deserve its own thread, but I didn't see a trade deadline thread posted.
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Definitely look into it. Only get serious if AD is found guilty.
-
- Commissioner
- Posts: 24788
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:30 pm
- Location: Des Moines, Iowa
- x 108
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Which we won't know until months from now. The trade deadline is October 28.TSonn wrote:Definitely look into it. Only get serious if AD is found guilty.
Spiller is pretty much what we're hoping McKinnon can be. They are very similar in size (Spiller is 5'11/200 and McKinnon is 5'9/208). The coaching staff likes Asiata and the book isn't closed on Peterson. For those reasons, I doubt they make a move.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death. I assure you, it's much more serious than that.” --- Bill Shankly
- chicagopurple
- All Pro Elite Player
- Posts: 1498
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 10:45 am
- x 88
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
I have virtually NO expectations that the Vikes will try to retain AP.....His own admissions are kind of self-damning and his inablility to keep his damn mouth shut garauntees future controversy......I doub the Wilfs really WANT to deal with APs baggage.....AP is more suited to the Raiders
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
If he's cheap, what the heck go for it. Need to try and field an NFL level offense at some point.
- PurpleKoolaid
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8641
- Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:52 pm
- x 28
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
If he can play the RB spot. Because Asiata is the only guy we have that has. And, well, he isn't scarring anyone.
- VikingLord
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 8301
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:12 pm
- Location: The Land of the Ice and Snow
- x 980
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
He sure did - he scarred me when I watched him muff that easy pass and it was picked off...PurpleKoolaid wrote:If he can play the RB spot. Because Asiata is the only guy we have that has. And, well, he isn't scarring anyone.
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
LOL! well played.VikingLord wrote: He sure did - he scarred me when I watched him muff that easy pass and it was picked off...
PurpleKoolAid, one of your typos struck again!
-
- Franchise Player
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:29 am
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
AP is gone, sad but true. If we can get Spiller for a reasonable value, go for it.
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
If Buffalo want to part with Spiller the way they parted with Marshawn Lynch, I'm game.
- London Viking
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:56 am
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
I say we forget about Spiller who it seems is becoming a bit of a spent force in Buffalo and look at the possibility of Gurley in the draft.
We've become so accustomed to seeing a leading back over the years and this kid seems the best Rb prospect to come out in years could he be what we are looking for to step into the big AP size void we have at present. ....not saying spend a 1st on him but if we are picking early 2nd why not??
We've become so accustomed to seeing a leading back over the years and this kid seems the best Rb prospect to come out in years could he be what we are looking for to step into the big AP size void we have at present. ....not saying spend a 1st on him but if we are picking early 2nd why not??
- London Viking
- Practice Squad
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2014 11:56 am
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Also add if Lynch is up for grabs in free agency we should try our hardest to pick him up
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Lynch is getting old and has some hard miles on him. I'd pass.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 9781
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 12:57 pm
- x 1868
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
I don't know, y'all.
Spiller gives you the occasional highlight, but he isn't a workhorse, and he isn't exactly lighting it up this year at 3.4 ypc. He's also never been a consistent threat in the passing game.
The Vikings need a back who can produce while shouldering the burden of 20 touches per game ... not another third-down back.
Spiller gives you the occasional highlight, but he isn't a workhorse, and he isn't exactly lighting it up this year at 3.4 ypc. He's also never been a consistent threat in the passing game.
The Vikings need a back who can produce while shouldering the burden of 20 touches per game ... not another third-down back.
Go ahead. I dare you.
Underestimate this man.
-
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 6652
- Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 6:28 pm
- x 21
Re: 100% Speculation - C.J. Spiller Trade Rumors.
Interesting takes from everyone. I appreciate everyone not ripping my head off and saying how pointless this thread was.
The way I see it, Peterson may never play for us again. IMO, Minnesota will join the masses and form a two-back system if Peterson is gone. I don't think this team will focus on having a bell-cow halfback should that scenario play out.
In my mind, going after Spiller makes sense. I know he and McKinnon are pretty similar, but Spiller is an experienced HB and not just solely an athlete. I think a two-back system of Spiller and McKinnon would create a lot of mismatch potential and open up the offense a bit more.
That being said, the possibility of this happening is essentially zero.
The way I see it, Peterson may never play for us again. IMO, Minnesota will join the masses and form a two-back system if Peterson is gone. I don't think this team will focus on having a bell-cow halfback should that scenario play out.
In my mind, going after Spiller makes sense. I know he and McKinnon are pretty similar, but Spiller is an experienced HB and not just solely an athlete. I think a two-back system of Spiller and McKinnon would create a lot of mismatch potential and open up the offense a bit more.
That being said, the possibility of this happening is essentially zero.
A Randy Moss fan for life. A Kevin Williams fan for life.