Vikings Message Board.Com

Norv Zimmer wrote:http://www.24sportsupport.com/report-ed ... n-vikings/

Wonder if this is true

The Vikings signing a Packer, sound legit!

Because it's the Vikings, and they are so maddeningly frustrating. Because they have put themselves in this position. Because they just provide lip service... Yea, we know the OL is bad, but we're going to spend our $ on an average lineman. Don't worry, we have multiple 6'th and 7'th round draft pi...

I wasn't thrilled with the idea of Lacy at first. After thinking it over it may not be a bad move. The key is to not think of him as a replacement for AD, think of him as a replacement for Asiata.. then it makes sense. I believe they will draft a RB too and go with a committee approach. His pay wou...

I can already tell you you're wrong at that one just by reading your first sentence. Adam Thielen was 40 yards short of 1000 last year and is a very good WR. The reason Treadwell didnt see action is because of guys like Thielen and Patterson. They came out of nowhere. We had nothing outside of Digg...

I really wanted to start a thread on this because I'm baffled by what went on here. 1.) Why were we going after Jeffery? 2.) If we offer him a multi year deal with more security, why is he choosing Philly? I'm personally glad we didnt sign him but at the same time, I also dont understand the infatu...

If he worse at every facet though? Brady? Yes. There not a single on field facet that Brady is better then Rodgers at, not statistically, physically, or otherwise. If Bellichek had a button that could trade Rodgers for Brady, he would push it without a moments thought, he is to good of a coach not ...

Cliff wrote: Nope, Brady is better.

Being worse then someone at every facet and being better are mutually exclusive.

I've seen Rodgers and Brady play many, many games and I came to my conclusion based on that. That's hilarious. The only thing that could possibly influence you to hold that decision is SB wins, everything else, the plays they make, are capable of making, raw ability, and most important, actual on f...

What does everyone think about Lacy visiting the Vikings? Seems crazy to me, and Packer fans are gonna be all over it "Vikings always take Packers scraps" blah blah He would be a good signing for any team that needs a bellcow back. And, I mean, when you sign Packers players like the Vikes...

Bigwehrm wrote:
Tell me which one of those guys is gonna be in the top 40% at their position?

I'm not saying hie is the only guy on that list that fits this description, but Lang is certainly a top 10 player at his position.

A little late, but LMAO at the Falcons. Just lmao.

Mothman wrote:

Wait: Aaron Rodgers isn't the best?

Nope, he is. Quite obviously, in fact.

How do we not have a Super Bowl thread??? Skol Patriots. Anyone who doesn't agree that Tom Brady is the best QB ever needs to get their head checked. And for the Falcon fans in Atlanta that gave me crap about the Vikings when I was down there for work, I have one thing to say to you: How many rings...

Cliff wrote:I'm firmly in the Brady over Rodgers camp now

Which also puts you in the Bradshaw over Marino camp.

That was the most satisfying game of the whole season. In an NFL which is set up to give every advantage to teams with top QBs, the better team won decisively. Its really embarassing that in 25 consecutive years with elite QB play the Packers have only managed 2 superbowls. They've probably been on...